Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I believe that the official game-day uniforms are not at issue, but day-to-day “practice-uniforms” (that may have even been purchased with private monies? IDK) have been in contention.I went to the Auburn University website to see the uniforms, but the only concerning thing I saw was something that looks like a Nike swoosh on the thighs. Am I missing something?
www.wvtm13.com
These are stills from the Facebook reel referenced in the original letter
Courts exist for a good reason.
You can believe something is a fact when, in fact, it isn't.
Seeing words about something isn't the same as doing research. I don't just believe whatever some people say. Something about echo-chambers, tribalism and all that.
No kidding.
And, likewise, you can believe something is not a fact when, in fact, it is. Belief does not change fact and, too often, sadly, vice versa.
I hope this goes to court and the prosecutor uses the same logic you're using. Religious freedom will reign and students will be able to proclaim their faith.
We don't know what these students' faiths are, if any. However, the practice uniforms are 'one religion fits all'.
Religious liberty is a constitutional right. Should I be able to refuse to play in games where blacks are playing? Muslims? We have adjudicated this in our courts.
So, perhaps it is OK for a school to have everyone recite the Nicene Creed before each game. After all, the player could choose not to play.
A uniform is not a religion.
I found that insignia. It's that famous lower-case T the Christians are so fond of. Or in other words, the cross.
The government didn't put those shirts in your wardrobe and require their use. Nor do they have religious significance. Your analogy is rotten.
Normal logic, that beliefs and facts are not the same and that neither implies the other? Yes, and I second your hope: prosecutors should use logic and law.
Students can currently proclaim their faith; they should not be required to proclaim faith that isn't their own. That is religious freedom
It’s a game to try to mimic the arguments in the gay wedding cake case.
