President Trump is nowhere close to being a king. If he was a king, then the Congress and the SCOTUS would not be able to restrict or restrain anything that President Trump does. He ain't nowhere even close to being a king.
"If he was a king, then the Congress and the SCOTUS would not be able to restrict or restrain anything that President Trump does."
Here I am, observing the failure of both Congress and the Supreme Court, to restrict and restrain Trump.
The Supreme Court has gutted the Voting Rights act, in service to Donald.
Congress, with a Republican majority, acts as Donald's rubber stamp for just about whatever he wants.
While the courts have attempted to curb Donald's absolutely insane unconstitutional actions--the Supreme Court, packed with Trumpist sycophants and loyalist cronies, has been systematically at work to undermine democracy in favor of the Trumpist regime.
So this comment of yours--not exactly the brilliant argument against "Trump as king"--when the people in power are actively doing obeisance to the mad king rather than using their constitutional powers to rein him in--it amounts to monarchy by any other name.
Let me ask you, if Donald Trump tries to run in 2028 and violate the 22nd Amendment, will you do your civic duty and oppose that act, or will you genuflect before the will of Donald Trump even though it violates the 22nd Amendment.
Are your civic loyalties to the Constitution and the Republic, or to Donald Trump?
In this above question, there are only two possible answers. Any attempt to dodge or deflect will be interpreted as cowardice to being honest.