• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Congress passes the largest housing affordability bill in decades

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
48,952
51,333
Los Angeles Area
✟1,141,379.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
The bill, called the 21st Century Road to Housing Act, passed 358-32 in the House. The Senate approved it Monday with similarly overwhelming bipartisan support. It now heads to President Trump's desk for his signature.

Rather than making a single change, the bill is a hodgepodge of provisions designed to either encourage housing construction or make it easier for home seekers to buy. The flashiest part of the package is a ban that prevents corporate investors [who already have 350 or more homes] from buying up more single-family homes to rent out.

[The bill] streamlines some of the regulations homebuilders must follow to get existing federal financing.

[It also makes life easier for prefab or modular homes.]

The bill also encourages local governments to speed up the homebuilding process by giving more federal dollars to places that build more housing. "If you don't build more housing, you should lose those incentives.

Eager to capitalize on a popular bipartisan win, Trump has canceled the signing ceremony. Wait.

[edit, at first blush, I thought he was cancelling the ceremony, but he's made it clear that he's not signing the bill unless he gets what he wants.]

1782313588897.png


House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., both celebrated the passage of the housing package, which cleared both chambers with overwhelming bipartisan support, an unusual feat in the sharply divided Congress.

Trump did not celebrate it quite as much.

1782313687982.png
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
42,448
17,309
Fort Smith
✟1,565,866.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
In developed areas, building new homes not only encourages sprawl but also puts infrastructure demands on cities that prevent them from repairing or replacing sewer, water lines, and roads in older areas.
And in almost every case, buying an older home that needs some TLC is much less expensive than buying new.
This scenario is taking place in our small city of 100, 000.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
31,777
31,338
Baltimore
✟978,201.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The bill, called the 21st Century Road to Housing Act, passed 358-32 in the House. The Senate approved it Monday with similarly overwhelming bipartisan support. It now heads to President Trump's desk for his signature.

Rather than making a single change, the bill is a hodgepodge of provisions designed to either encourage housing construction or make it easier for home seekers to buy. The flashiest part of the package is a ban that prevents corporate investors [who already have 350 or more homes] from buying up more single-family homes to rent out.

[The bill] streamlines some of the regulations homebuilders must follow to get existing federal financing.

[It also makes life easier for prefab or modular homes.]

The bill also encourages local governments to speed up the homebuilding process by giving more federal dollars to places that build more housing. "If you don't build more housing, you should lose those incentives.

Eager to capitalize on a popular bipartisan win, Trump has canceled the signing ceremony. Wait.

View attachment 380685

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., both celebrated the passage of the housing package, which cleared both chambers with overwhelming bipartisan support, an unusual feat in the sharply divided Congress.

Trump did not celebrate it quite as much.

View attachment 380686
Such eloquence and lucidity.

In both chambers, the housing bill got way more votes than needed to override a veto. In order to actually override the veto, they'd have to vote on it a second time. It'd be amusing to see him get shut down like that.
 
Upvote 0

MarcusGregor

New year, new you...
Oct 1, 2025
348
610
26
South
✟38,039.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I have yet to read the bill but from what I've seen from others who claim they have this bill is toothless and doesn't really do much to actually provide a solution to the housing affordability problem. It seems to mainly be a vehicle for deregulation, which is just part and parcel for this administration.
 

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
12,383
10,317
66
Martinez
✟1,309,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The bill, called the 21st Century Road to Housing Act, passed 358-32 in the House. The Senate approved it Monday with similarly overwhelming bipartisan support. It now heads to President Trump's desk for his signature.

Rather than making a single change, the bill is a hodgepodge of provisions designed to either encourage housing construction or make it easier for home seekers to buy. The flashiest part of the package is a ban that prevents corporate investors [who already have 350 or more homes] from buying up more single-family homes to rent out.

[The bill] streamlines some of the regulations homebuilders must follow to get existing federal financing.

[It also makes life easier for prefab or modular homes.]

The bill also encourages local governments to speed up the homebuilding process by giving more federal dollars to places that build more housing. "If you don't build more housing, you should lose those incentives.

Eager to capitalize on a popular bipartisan win, Trump has canceled the signing ceremony. Wait.

View attachment 380685

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., both celebrated the passage of the housing package, which cleared both chambers with overwhelming bipartisan support, an unusual feat in the sharply divided Congress.

Trump did not celebrate it quite as much.

View attachment 380686
Sadly, this bill is a wish list straight from the corporate offices of Clayton Homes and Champion Home Builders. That being said on a brighter note, this could be a great solution for tiny home communities who aim to house the homeless. Now we just need cities to get on board and rezone parcels! But the elephant in the room is the attempt to fracture or eliminate environmental laws but in reality it cant on the state level. It explicitly states that it does not preempt state land-use, zoning, or environmental laws.
Thanks for sharing.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
31,777
31,338
Baltimore
✟978,201.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
It seems to mainly be a vehicle for deregulation, which is just part and parcel for this administration.

??? It was co-sponsored by Elizabeth Warren and Trump is basically trying to pocket veto this.

Sadly, this bill is a wish list straight from the corporate offices of Clayton Homes and Champion Home Builders. That being said on a brighter note, this could be a great solution for tiny home communities who aim to house the homeless. Now we just need cities to get on board and rezone parcels! But the elephant in the room is the attempt to fracture or eliminate environmental laws but in reality it cant on the state level. It explicitly states that it does not preempt state land-use, zoning, or environmental laws.
Thanks for sharing.
The interests of developers and the public can be aligned - and on this subject, often are. At least according to the AP article, the environmental review requirement is suspended when the project is going up between two buildings that already passed it, which sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Environmental laws have been a huge bottleneck, and a tool for NIMBY's, for ages now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

MarcusGregor

New year, new you...
Oct 1, 2025
348
610
26
South
✟38,039.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
??? It was co-sponsored by Elizabeth Warren and Trump is basically trying to pocket veto this.
Like I said, I haven't read it, but maybe that assessment is wrong. I hope it's something good to come out of this congress,
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
48,952
51,333
Los Angeles Area
✟1,141,379.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
It would be better if it put (more) federal funding into building housing, but we don't have a lot of money to spend, so finding little levers here and there to grease the wheels is probably the best we could hope for. [That said, we should also be addressing high density housing. Not just SFR.]
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
9,943
6,719
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟559,677.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
48,952
51,333
Los Angeles Area
✟1,141,379.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
31,777
31,338
Baltimore
✟978,201.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Even supposing there is some national emergency for him to address, why can't he take five seconds to sign a popular bipartisan bill?
leverage, petulance, etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: SarahsKnight
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
9,943
6,719
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟559,677.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Even supposing there is some national emergency for him to address, why can't he take five seconds to sign a popular bipartisan bill?
That's an easy answer. He's trying to get Congress to pass the S.A.V.E. America Act in order to make sure that only legal voters are actually voting. This is an issue that 80% of Americans support. But the feckless politicians in the Senate refuse to pass that Act. The national emergency is that our voting system is not nearly as secure as it should be.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Under the Southern Cross I stand...
Aug 19, 2018
25,690
17,902
73
Bondi
✟439,316.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
That's an easy answer. He's trying to get Congress to pass the S.A.V.E. America Act in order to make sure that only legal voters are actually voting. This is an issue that 80% of Americans support. But the feckless politicians in the Senate refuse to pass that Act. The national emergency is that our voting system is not nearly as secure as it should be.
Some people constantly complain that there are those amongst us who literally wouldn't support anything good that Trump would do. I read through the op thinking that at last we have an opportunity to do so. To show that if he really does something that deserves credit, then he'll receive credit for it. So I mentally have my finger poised over the Like button when I get to this:

The 'signing is hereby cancelled'...

...and he snatches defeat from the jaws of victory and confirms his petulance. Even when I want to congratulate him for something he won't let me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

Pommer

Future History Slab Carver
Sep 13, 2008
25,350
15,417
Earth
✟305,926.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
That's an easy answer. He's trying to get Congress to pass the S.A.V.E. America Act in order to make sure that only legal voters are actually voting. This is an issue that 80% of Americans support. But the feckless politicians in the Senate refuse to pass that Act. The national emergency is that our voting system is not nearly as secure as it should be.
I‘m not worried about how our elections are being run. That States are doing a fine job.
But we need houses yesterday.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
48,952
51,333
Los Angeles Area
✟1,141,379.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

'As long as it takes': Trump allies freeze House floor to pressure Senate on voter ID bill

Rep Anna Paulina Luna says the group will hold up every piece of legislation until SAVE America Act passes​

The hardball tactics led House Republican leadership to pull a series of votes on Wednesday. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is expected to put legislation that had already been teed up for a vote Thursday, but it is unclear whether he will be able to convince Luna and other conservatives to end their blockade, effectively freezing the House floor.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
8,502
5,901
NW
✟319,377.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
That's an easy answer. He's trying to get Congress to pass the S.A.V.E. America Act in order to make sure that only legal voters are actually voting. This is an issue that 80% of Americans support.
False. 80% of voters don't support that bill.
But the feckless politicians in the Senate refuse to pass that Act. The national emergency is that our voting system is not nearly as secure as it should be.
If there was an emergency, you could provide examples of fraud (other than Trump's electoral cheating).
 
Upvote 0

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
10,804
4,465
Massachusetts
✟218,871.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
If there was an emergency, you could provide examples of fraud (other than Trump's electoral cheating).
Don't hold your breath. No one has provided any such examples yet, and I suspect they're not going to anytime soon.

And we all know why.

-- A2SG, not that those who promote unfounded conspiracy theories like this one will admit it.....
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
9,943
6,719
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟559,677.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
In practically every poll, 80% of Americans DO support the SAVE America Act. And, if there really is NO fraud in our elections, then why do Democratic Party politicians lie about the SAVE Act? Why do Democratic Party politicians stand in the way of making sure our elections are 100% secure?
 
Upvote 0

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
10,804
4,465
Massachusetts
✟218,871.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
In practically every poll, 80% of Americans DO support the SAVE America Act.
Not exactly. See, 80% of Republicans who watch Fox News may support it, but the rest of the country, not so much.


But, perhaps you'd care to show us the polls you got your information from, as I have?

And, if there really is NO fraud in our elections, then why do Democratic Party politicians lie about the SAVE Act?
What lies, exactly? Please, be specific about what those lies are, and who is lying.

But, beyond that, if there really is fraud in our elections, why can't anyone provide any evidence for it? No one has, not even once. And there are people who have specifically said they have evidence, folks like Mike "Pillow Guy" Lindell, Ka$h Patel and even Donald Trump himself, but none of them have provided even a hint of that evidence in all the years since the accusations first surfaced.

Why is that?

Why do Democratic Party politicians stand in the way of making sure our elections are 100% secure?
How, exactly, will the SAVE act guarantee that? And please, be specific.

-- A2SG, no matter how often I ask some people for specifics, they never seem able to provide any.....
 
Upvote 0