Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Conspiracy junk by a poor loser.
You literally just said that to prove under 18 U.S.C. § 597, federal prosecutors must prove
According to the above it isn't.
Is what was said in the video fact or not. If its fact then its not a conspiracy but shows a long track record of fraudulant behaviour. Withe the same MO as to what we are seeing right now.
Yeah I guess when those leaders destroy the city people will just keep voting in leaders to destroy their city. Strange logic.
I don't think you want to go back in history on stuff like this as it does not bear well for the dems.
From the video linked earlier
No that is exactly what they are trying to weed out. If its transparent then all will see whether there is fraud or irregularities going on with both sides.
This is something the states do. Not the federal government.
This is something the states do (and release to We The People).
Let him do so, then.
Let him do so, then.
Nice set of cherry picked examples but none of them prove that this most recent election in LA was rigged or stolen. Republican suspicions aren’t evidence of any wrongdoing. If you suspect this election was fraudulent then you have to provide the evidence for this election being fraudulent, not point to previous elections.
It doesn't matter. If they have nothing to hide then they won't find anything. But usually this works that there is some irregular or anomely that they want to follow up. Like the illegal registrations for payment or falsifying names.
Thats like putting the inmates in charge of the jail. I think its reasonable to say that the feds should have some role in overseering that proper elections are carried out. The States still have a right to run the elections and most of the admin. But I think it is good that the feds have some oversight ensure proper elections which it comes to fraud or descrimination ect.
I thought there was federal jurisdiction on some issues. ie
You just said the Feds don't have a right to do anything and its up to the States to ensure proper voting and election systems as above.
lol yeah "I come from a land down under where beer does flow and men chunder".
I agree. As the link mentioned the legislation (search warrant) is already in place with the Acts mentioned. Just like the welfare fraud. If there is evidence of illegal activity or financial irregularities then there is justification under whatever Act is being breached.
Yes I agree. Whatever specific records relate to the fraud or mismanagement can only be investigated. When it overlaps into fed jurisdiction as mentioned. But they still refuse to hand over the requested rolls ect when asked.
I agree and that would be wrong. This comes under the Privacy Act or Information and Privacy Act. You can only share a persons private information or ID numbers that directly relate to the specific issue or area of support or funding ect.
Yes there has to be probable cause. But I also think there are provisions without cause that are built into the Act. Such as if the State gets money from the feds then the feds can audit. I think there were 5 categories they have jurisdiction without cause
I agree. But the examples are what they are. They show a history of fraud. Even if we go with the rep also having a history of fraud this still does not negate that the system is open to abuse and needs fixing.
Its not republican suspicions when its normal practice and part of the legislation under the Acts cited. It says the States are required to maintain and make available for public inspection certain records concerning the implementation of programs for ensuring the accuracy of voter rolls. The Attorney General may bring civil actions to enforce the NVRA.
Of course it matters. It's governmental overreach to grab data that doesn't belong to them per the Constitution. The law says there must be a basis for investigation; they cannot investigate "just because."
This administration is renown for invention. "They're eating the cats! They're eating the dogs!" - that came from the president and the VP. The president has claimed baselessly that elections are rigged.
Usually. These anomalies are investigated and dealt with by the state as it is the state, not the feds, who are responsible for the governance of elections. The federal government can advise and certify voting apparatus, but unless there is evidence of illegality not addressed by the state, then the feds have no business sticking their noses in state business.
No, it is wasteful and corrupt to go on fishing expeditions.
Well, then have Congress change the law.
Well, then have Congress change the law.
Let see you have "unjustified" to describe broad searches that violate the Constitution and then make claims that aspects of regular law can over ride it? Again, perhaps this is how it works on you island, but not here.
Which does not make them a vector to interfere in elections.
You seem to talking of your colony again, because there is no such "federal registration" in the US.
That makes no sense. There is a "bar code" on every letter I get, but it encodes the "ZIP+4" code, which is as I recall a block on suburban streets like mine, or could be a building, or even a large PO Box. The USPS is not involved in registering voters. The USPS delivers mail and is a federally owned non-profit corporation.
