You write nonsense rambles. They deserve pushback.
Hum "you deserve" like its some moral crusade and lesson to be taught.
Show me exactly where I am rambling nonsense ? You just call it that because you don't like it. Nothing I said is nonsense or rambling. As I said I was specific. I explained why mail in voting is not the best way to vote because its open to abuse. Plain and simple and relevant Hans.
Your point is false. The fraud committers are not running elections. Nor is there any reason to think those committing welfare fraud would need to vote fraudulently. It is all irrelevant. (And Minnesota.)
First Is not the government the ones who set the conditions for how voting is to be done. They decide on whether mail in voting is allowed, how votes are collected and what criteria is required to vote. They create the conditions that are more supceptible to fraud.
Second there is reason to think that people who commit welfare or any fraud will more likly commit fraud. Thats why insurance is much higher in high theft and fraud crime areas. Thats why we put locks on a stuff when around those who are more likely to steal. Its psychology 101.
Third the dems have been busted harvesting votes from homeless people. Live footage of dozens being paid to vote Dem. It seems agents are going around registering people to vote dem for money. This is well known that the Dems have a long history of fraud when it comes to voting.
PAID to register to vote? Federal prosecutors say a Southern California woman was giving homeless people cash on Skid Row to sign voter registration forms. They say she’s now agreed to plead guilty.
www.facebook.com
Its funny. You object to the initial statement as being false. Then dismiss it all as not relevant when its backed up as a fact. It is relevant because it lends support that something fishy is going on with voting as to why on earth leaders who have bad records keep getting in.
Or maybe its some sort of fatal empathy for holding tight to ideas that they know destroy society because the alternative is too hard to admit.
I am not. I was very clear and simple about how being willing to commit fraud or steal or be willing to do the same undermines integrity.
Willingness to defraud or allow deception requires cognitive rationalization, which invariably erodes a person's overarching ethical foundation Psychological Pathways to Fraud.
The elections board does not run the welfare system. I don't know why this is hard for you to understand.
But they are run by the same admin that runs the welfare system. Slack in admin of welfare leads to slack in admin of election systems from collection to counting.
Not one minute later. It took almost a week of counting votes cast by people who didn't vote for him for him to be eliminated. (see previous statements about republicans and mail-in voting plus democrats and hard choice for governor.)
Yes Raman who did not even win her own electorate and was 4th candidtate in line got a spike in votes with 40% mail in votes. Thus knocking the only rep candidate out. To make it a two dem race. The question is why Raman when she was trending unpopular before the mail in votes ?
In many other states, the vote totals are "known" by dawn the next morning barring a small trickle of oversees voters. California has a "post-mark by election day, 7 days to arrive" rule and uses "central counting". Both of which cause delays.
I wonder why.
There is plenty of discussion on voter ID on this board (and probably in this thread) so I'm not going to join that. Neither you, nor I vote by mail nor do we vote in California.
Why would you exclude a major and central part of the discussion on mail in voting. Voter ID is central to the mail in voting system. It changes it dramatically and cuts out much of the issues of laxness inherent in mail in voting.
Let me know when that happens. My French ancestors had an alternative plan...
It will probably be around the same time the US becomes a united socialist republic.
They have a wide variety of ideologies to pick from. The two democrats surviving for LA mayor are quite different. I wouldn't be surprised if the 15% of Angelenos who are Republicans make the difference by voting for the incumbent, mainstream Democrat in November.
Actually they will probably vote for Raman. They would be to upset at Bass. But then I have heard raman is pretty radical as well. But either way they still get the same broad socialist progressive policies that are destroying the State and cities that santuary States want.
25 of the 61 candidates for governor where Democrats. There were many Republicans running as well.
Ok I see. yes thats similar here as well for local elections. State has a few more and nationally its more limited to about 20 or so. Like the National shooters or farmers party or the Pot party lol. But they may align with a major party to get the peferences.
Still it always ends up with Labor (dem) and Conservatives (rep) fighting it out by design. You cannot end up with two Labor or Conservatives. That seems unfair. Its like going to buy a car and they only sell you Ford. They may have different models but its always Ford and never Holden.
It's a silly system and Californians seem to have had enough of it. I'm not sure how it will help the GOP with a guarenteed slot on the general election ballot as they are a low popularity party.
I think if Pratt took his campaign to the next level with say debates and all that I think he would have gained more votes. maybe not to win but to highlight an alternative policy and ideas. Then this allows people to become aware and they may give an alternative party a chance.
I think Pratt has already done that and I think you will find after another few years of the same old ideas and policies that more people will be willing to change. There is usually a fairly large middle ground which will switch either way. But it seems in some States its one way which I don't think is good in the long run.
Weird that people vote for the party that gives them the most benefit with the fewest taxes. Too bad for the GOP that they suck so bad at this for the needs of California.
I thought the Dems or Labor were the party of highest taxes. Is that not what Mandami is doing in NY. I am pretty sure california ranks around 10 or 11th on tax burden. Thats not great.
But I think its more than that. Its the social burden of homelessness, drugs and crime and the policies that encourage it. Its the fraud and mismanagement of tax payers money. Its the quality of life.
While California remains a highly popular state, it faces significant structural and economic issues that regularly place it at the bottom of national quality-of-life and relocation rankings. Organizations like
ConsumerAffairs have ranked the Golden State as the single worst state to move to due to compounding factors in several key areas. [
1,
2,
3]
