Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You mean the Jewish converts who only had the Old Testament heard read in the Temple and Synagogues and the oral tradition of the Apostles?How about the earliest church?
Your response is typical of the ignorant nonsense spouted by modern churches with no historical link to the early Church.
We don't say male and female are the same. The same is true for Jews and Gentiles.
That is not my intention. I am just sick and tired of the "Church" denying the Jewish roots of Jesus for the sake of "historical context," rather than what the Bible says.
From my perspective on hermeneutics, I'd think that the Church would affirm Jesus' Jewish roots because of "historical contexts" rather than denying it or ignoring it.
But I know, there's unfortunately a dozen different ways Christians are reading and interpreting the Bible these days.
What are you talking about?The time is now
What are you talking about?
Honest question.
We can talk about whatever you’d like in private message!!!Is prophecy happening before our eyes? I would argue it
The NT is not all of the oral tradition from the Apostles. They spent months and years establishing the Churches, teaching them the faith. They wrote very little.Sure, where everything in the NT came from.
And some things are plainly false, like your claim that Easter has pagan origins.The early church does not change what the Bible says. Some things are only clear in hindsight.
As long as they remain anti-Christ, we should continue to oppose them.Chrysostom basically had the position of "All Israel will be saved, but until then, they are a great obstacle, and we should vehemently oppose them."
The time is now.
As long as they remain anti-Christ, we should continue to oppose them.
The first Christians were Jews. The Gospel was taken to the Jews first, then later to the Gentiles. Salvation is from the Jews.Thank you for proving my point.
"To the JEW FIRST" is a verse you do not believe.
The first Christians were Jews. The Gospel was taken to the Jews first, then later to the Gentiles. Salvation is from the Jews.
I believe all of that. What you claim I believe is your own false opinion.
It is true for every Jew who turns to Christ.But you don't believe it is true today
It is true for every Jew who turns to Christ.
My Church has been in Israel since the beginning, witnessing to the Jews, and has suffered persecution and martyrdom in response.Romans 10:14-17 CSB17
"How, then, can they call on him they have not believed in? And how can they believe without hearing about him? And how can they hear without a preacher? And how can they preach unless they are sent? As it is written: How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news. But not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, Lord, who has believed our message? So faith comes from what is heard, and what is heard comes through the message about Christ."
This is NOT talking about a Jew simply getting saved. It is about the fact that we need evangelists to evangelize to the Jews, in fact, "To the Jews first." "To the Jew first" is about evangelizing Jews. Yet, you discard this and oppose the Jews. That is why I say you do not believe the verse. When a verse is about evangelizing Jews, and you say to oppose the Jews, then that is a direct contradiction to scripture.
My Church has been in Israel since the beginning, witnessing to the Jews, and has suffered persecution and martyrdom in response.
Perhaps I should rephrase my response to "opposing Judaism" rather than "opposing Jews". Modern Judaism was born out of the Pharisaic tradition which has ever stood in opposition to Christ since the destruction of the Temple.