• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

SCOTUS' conservative majority makes a surprise decision

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
10,772
10,519
the Great Basin
✟429,216.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, That is how it currently, or previously worked..

No, that isn't how it worked. Everyone that lived in the Congressional District was able to vote, regardless of race. It is just that the communities in question had a majority of Black people.

Exactly... So, Republican black voices are not heard.

No, they counted just as much as any other Black persons voice. Instead, what is going to happen is that (by your claims) no Democratic Black person's voice will be heard -- they'll be drowned out in a "White Republican" district. Not to mention, there will be zero Democratic Congresspersons from the entire state -- so all the Democrats of any race will have their voices silenced.

No, This bill is preventing that from happening, going forward..

There is no bill, merely a Supreme Court ruling that decided the law no longer needs to be followed. I recall when Republican's hated when judges "legislated from the bench." Suddenly they now love it.

Currently, it is preventing black conservative voices from being heard.

Whichever the majority in that district voted for, Should stay that way. They should not be moved to a different district.

And yet, all the Black people will be moved to districts that have White majorities. It will be all Blacks whose voices are silenced.
 
Upvote 0

tobelieveinHim

Active Member
Sep 13, 2022
240
144
Surprise
✟59,535.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
No, that isn't how it worked. Everyone that lived in the Congressional District was able to vote, regardless of race. It is just that the communities in question had a majority of Black people.
No,
No, they counted just as much as any other Black persons voice. Instead, what is going to happen is that (by your claims) no Democratic Black person's voice will be heard -- they'll be drowned out in a "White Republican" district. Not to mention, there will be zero Democratic Congresspersons from the entire state -- so all the Democrats of any race will have their voices silenced.
No.
There is no bill, merely a Supreme Court ruling that decided the law no longer needs to be followed. I recall when Republican's hated when judges "legislated from the bench." Suddenly they now love it.
The people won't be moved, but whoever was voted into that district, should stay in that district. Nobody should come in and remove an elected official from that district.
And yet, all the Black people will be moved to districts that have White majorities. It will be all Blacks whose voices are silenced.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

Future History Slab Carver
Sep 13, 2008
25,207
15,339
Earth
✟303,060.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
No,

No.

The people won't be moved, but whoever was voted into that district, should stay in that district. Nobody should come in and remove an elected official from that district.
One of us is confused.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
10,772
10,519
the Great Basin
✟429,216.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No,

No.

The people won't be moved, but whoever was voted into that district, should stay in that district. Nobody should come in and remove an elected official from that district.

Let's try this, this is the map of Louisana's Congressional map that the Supreme Court recently ruled on, the ruling that basically demolished the Voting Rights Act:
image.png


Could you please point out the two districts where only Black people get to vote -- and also inform me which district the White People that live in that Black area would vote in?

As I stated earlier, the "Black Districts" are no different than any other districts, other than they have a majority of Black voters -- though everyone that lives in the district boundaries has the same vote.
 
Upvote 0

tobelieveinHim

Active Member
Sep 13, 2022
240
144
Surprise
✟59,535.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Let's try this, this is the map of Louisana's Congressional map that the Supreme Court recently ruled on, the ruling that basically demolished the Voting Rights Act:
View attachment 380091

Could you please point out the two districts where only Black people get to vote -- and also inform me which district the White People that live in that Black area would vote in?

As I stated earlier, the "Black Districts" are no different than any other districts, other than they have a majority of Black voters -- though everyone that lives in the district boundaries has the same vote.
If a district voted in an elected official, The government should not be able to then come in, and displace that elected official to another district.
The elected official should remain where they were voted for.

It's shady, politics that the Democrats started, and it ought to be fixed!
That's all i have to say.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
44,205
21,416
Finger Lakes
✟375,116.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If a district voted in an elected official, The government should not be able to then come in, and displace that elected official to another district.
Which government is doing this? The state governments.

Elected officials are not displaced to another district, but the next time the elections are held officials are either reelected or not. Sometimes, districts will no longer exist - in which case, who would the official be representing - and in other cases, new districts are formed.

The elected official should remain where they were voted for.
They do until the next election when they may or may not be voted for.
It's shady, politics that the Democrats started, and it ought to be fixed!
Gerrymandering is shady. The question is how to fix it. As for who started it, don't be naive - it's been around before these parties existed.
That's all i have to say.
Hm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

Pommer

Future History Slab Carver
Sep 13, 2008
25,207
15,339
Earth
✟303,060.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
If a district voted in an elected official, The government should not be able to then come in, and displace that elected official to another district.
The elected official should remain where they were voted for.

It's shady, politics that the Democrats started, and it ought to be fixed!
That's all i have to say.
The debate is limited to US House districts.
 
Upvote 0