• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Hawaii tried to criminalize political jokes. The Babylon Bee made it pay

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
190,604
70,616
Woods
✟6,595,183.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
For years, there has been a progressive effort to criminalize parody and political humor, a push that hit a low point in 2023 when satirist Douglas Mackey was sentenced to seven months in prison for engaging in “conspiracy against rights” over an Internet meme.

Fortunately, a unanimous appellate court overturned his conviction, finding that there wasn’t a shred of evidence indicating that Mackey had ever coordinated, solicited, or intimidated anyone in posting his meme, as the prosecution had alleged. The man had simply told a joke.

Despite this, progressive states continue to try to put guardrails on speech, including political satire, but they, too, are learning that the First Amendment is an especially strong bulwark against government authoritarianism.

The latest to learn the lesson is Hawaii.

The Aloha State recently agreed to pay approximately $118,000 in attorney fees and costs to the satire website The Babylon Bee and political activist Dawn O’Brien after the pair successfully challenged the state’s law banning certain “materially deceptive” election-related content. The law targeted parody and satirical political content deemed harmful to a candidate’s reputation during election season and threatened fines and jail time for creators unless they added disclaimers stating that the material was fictional.

Continued below.
 

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
17,918
4,623
Louisville, Ky
✟1,155,914.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
For years, there has been a progressive effort to criminalize parody and political humor, a push that hit a low point in 2023 when satirist Douglas Mackey was sentenced to seven months in prison for engaging in “conspiracy against rights” over an Internet meme.

Fortunately, a unanimous appellate court overturned his conviction, finding that there wasn’t a shred of evidence indicating that Mackey had ever coordinated, solicited, or intimidated anyone in posting his meme, as the prosecution had alleged. The man had simply told a joke.

Despite this, progressive states continue to try to put guardrails on speech, including political satire, but they, too, are learning that the First Amendment is an especially strong bulwark against government authoritarianism.

The latest to learn the lesson is Hawaii.

The Aloha State recently agreed to pay approximately $118,000 in attorney fees and costs to the satire website The Babylon Bee and political activist Dawn O’Brien after the pair successfully challenged the state’s law banning certain “materially deceptive” election-related content. The law targeted parody and satirical political content deemed harmful to a candidate’s reputation during election season and threatened fines and jail time for creators unless they added disclaimers stating that the material was fictional.

Continued below.
It's amazing how some see the speck in another's eye but fail to perceive the plank in their own
 
Upvote 0