• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Judge rejects Planned Parenthood’s attempt to kill false advertising complaint

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
190,604
70,617
Woods
✟6,595,213.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
A judge has rejected Planned Parenthood's effort to dismiss a complaint from the Florida Attorney General's Office accusing the nation's leading abortion provider of violating laws against false advertising.

Circuit Court Judge J. Scott Duncan of the First Judicial Circuit in and for Santa Rosa County issued an order last week denying Planned Parenthood's motion to dismiss the lawsuit.

At issue is whether Planned Parenthood violated state law when it claimed that abortion-inducing drugs are safer than various over-the-counter drugs.

Duncan wrote that "the Court cannot conclude at this stage of the litigation" whether the abortion provider's claims constituted "non-actionable puffery," or exaggerated claims about a product that are protected by law.

"In making a comparison, the Defendants went beyond vague promotional language," Duncan wrote. "Now whether these statements are actionable or non-actionable may depend upon the context in which they were made."

Continued below.
 

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
10,008
6,747
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟564,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0