Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, Lord knows even as bad as this court is they should be taking their ques from literal wingnuts.
Sounds like a proper ruling to me, but calling attorneys incompetent seems way out of line unless I missed something. The government was holding an individual who was found guilty of lewd and lascivious assault against a minor and a court had provided a deportation order. The problem is that although the U.S. may be close to a breakthrough with Cuba, right now we don't have an agreement with Cuba to allow the deportation. There is no way to know how close that agreement may be. I don't know what kind of case the attorneys are supposed to make when they can provide no date as to when he can be deported. I filed a case in federal court where a government intelligence agency had given me a date to turn over records and then changed their mind and wouldn't provide another future date. Just like in this case the judge found that unreasonable and ordered they provide the records to me. "Indefinitely" does not seem to hold up well in court. Let's hope for an agreement with Cuba.
www.dailykos.com
The deportation order was issued over 20 years ago. Since, as you said, there is no way to actually deport him to Cuba, he has been on a form of (effectively) parole ever since, per the article. The incompetence comes in because the government insisted on holding him despite knowing that they could not deport him to his country of origin, and not having made arrangements to deport him elsewhere.
Same as this guy?
newrepublic.com
Yes, that's another example. It's no secret I have come out strongly against the progressives on crime, and child predators in my opinion are some the very worst of criminals. The only thing you have wrong is about Trump's pardon which was specific, not blanket. That means it only applied to crimes on J6.Same as this guy?
Convicted Child Sex Predator Avoids Prison Thanks to Trump Pardon
Andrew Taake is free despite pleading guilty to the crime.
'Amid Donald Trump’s pardons of his fellow Republicans and corrupt business figures, one child sex predator has gotten a clean slate.
Andrew Taake, who was serving time for taking part in the January 6, 2021, Capitol insurrection, benefited from Trump’s broad pardons... thanks to the time he served for January 6 before Trump’s pardon, most of which was in pretrial detention, Taake accrued about three years and seven months of “credit,” for his earlier sex crimes, according to Harris County court documents. Taake was only sentenced for his crimes at the Capitol last summer, and thanks to Trump’s blanket pardon, was released from the federal ADX Florence supermax prison in January just months into his six-year term.'
He went free.
He wad released purely because of the pardon. Read the article. Notwithstanding that some of the criminals pardoned have gone on to commit other crimes. Including sexual ssssult of minors.
I don't quite understand how the math is mathing in this case. How does a pardon for J6 get him out of jail early for pedoizing? Did all the time he served for J6 just get counted against his diddling?
As I correctly stated, Trump's pardon applied to J6. Of course Trump didn't cut the deal with the sex offender, it was the D.A. Technical troubles on the rest, some kind of "inserts" showing up.
