• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Doctrine of Unconditional Election

Delvianna

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2025
1,190
1,378
40
Florida
✟54,846.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Divorced
You cherry picked the verses you challenging everybody with ! You haven't put no work in but expect others to put the work in for you.
Thats so rich considering you wont engage with it and I gave examples. I can give LOTS more scriptures to oppose your doctrine but you cant. Calvaniatic doctrine uses the same handful of verses.

But I guess you guys just dont love the truth and are fine with false doctrine.
 
Upvote 0

John Bauer

Reformed
Jul 21, 2022
609
408
Vancouver
✟96,190.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Fair enough. Okay, I'll stick with these 3 for now: Matthew 23:37, Romans 11:20-22 and 2 Peter 3:9.

Matthew 23:37​

“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those who are sent to you! How often I have longed to gather your children together as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you would have none of it!”​

Your Argument:
This shows that God not only wanted the people in general to be close to him, but the fact that they were unwilling shows human agency. So it's not a lack of desire on Christ's part, but a refusal on theirs. That strongly implies meaningful human response rather than an irresistible, unconditional process where the outcome was fixed regardless of their willingness.

My Rebuttal:

You will need to read that passage a little more carefully. Jesus did not say, “I have longed to gather you, but you were unwilling.” There is a clear and crucial difference between “you” and “your children.” Think about the immediate context. Jesus had just finished condemning the religious leaders of Jerusalem, “You keep locking people out of the kingdom of heaven! For you neither enter nor permit those trying to enter to go in” (v. 13). This is Christ’s prophetic lament over Jerusalem’s leadership, whose resistance to God’s messengers goes back millennia and includes their hinderance of those under their care.

Romans 11:20-22​

Granted, they were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but fear! For if God did not spare the natural branches, perhaps he will not spare you. Notice therefore the kindness and harshness of God—harshness toward those who have fallen, but God's kindness toward you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off.​

Your Argument:
This passage explicitly connects being broken off with unbelief, and remaining with continuing in faith. Paul does not describe their status as unconditional. In fact, he warns believers not to become arrogant because they, too, can be cut off if they do not continue in God’s kindness. That warning seems difficult to explain if salvation is entirely unconditional in the absolute Calvinistic sense, because the warning is tied directly to belief, unbelief, and continuing.

My Rebuttal:

First, this does not seem related to unconditional election, but to perseverance of the saints—a different letter of the acrostic TULIP.

Second, Romans 11 supports unconditional election. Paul has already said, “God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew” (v. 2), and he explains Israel’s division in terms of election: “The elect obtained it, but the rest were hardened” (v. 7). So whatever “broken off” and “cut off” mean in verses 20–22, they cannot mean that God’s foreknown elect can finally perish.

Third, “unconditional” is not a status; “elect” is (cf. “Paul does not describe their status as unconditional”). Paul is not discussing, here, whether God chose people on the basis of foreseen perseverance. He is warning that visible covenant participants should not presume upon their present standing while persisting in unbelief or arrogance. Totally different issue.

Fourth, the doctrine is unconditional election, not unconditional salvation—whatever that is (cf. “if salvation is entirely unconditional”). Election and salvation are two different things. Election is part of salvation; it is not the same thing as salvation.

2 Peter 3:9​

The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.​

Your Argument:
How can God be patient towards someone, not wanting anyone to "perish" but come to repentance, if technically that doesn't matter if election is unconditional? Notice it says he does not want “any” to perish and desires “all” to come to repentance. If this verse was pointed to God only dealing with the elect and only wanting them to repent, then "anyone" and "all" wouldn't be in this verse. And if you say that it's just Gods nature that he doesn't want anyone to perish but still only selects a few people, then that brings into question why he would purposefully ignore other people despite him not wanting them to perish.

My Rebuttal:

To whom is Peter writing? He says that God is being patient toward “you,” so who is that? Is it all mankind?

No, his letters contradict that idea. Look at the first sentence of this passage (2 Peter 3:1), where he says this is the “second” letter he has written to them. To whom was his first epistle written? The elect (1 Pet. 1:1-2).

You can even look at the first sentence of this second epistle (2 Peter 1:1). He was talking to “those who through the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ, have been granted a faith just as precious as ours.” Is that all mankind? Clearly not.

If Peter is addressing those whom God has chosen, not all mankind, then how does 2 Peter 3:9 make any sense?

Well, imagine that you have called a staff meeting. As you stand, looking over the people gathered in the conference room, you announce, “We cannot afford to have anyone miss this information, so before I get to what I have to tell you, I need to know if everyone is here.” Obviously you are not asking if all eight billion people on the planet are present in the conference room, and you’re certainly not asking if all people who have existed, do exist, and will ever exist are present. The "anyone" and "everyone" are directly related to the "you" being addressed: your staff members.

The Lord is patient with “you,” Peter said. The Lord doesn’t want to "anyone" of those with whom he is patient to perish but to have "everyone" among his elect to come to repentance. God is patient with you, Peter said, referring to his friends, to whom he had written before, who are chosen by God and receive the apostolic faith. That great day will not come before every last one of you are redeemed.

This understanding gains further support when you read elsewhere in Scripture that God has a select remnant of Israel chosen by grace and a select number of Gentiles. God is not slow in keeping his promise; he is being patient, waiting until that full number of God's chosen has been fulfilled. In other words, the Day of the Lord will not come until all those he has chosen have been born and redeemed. Be patient, and give thanks and glory to God for the salvation of so many.

Additional thoughts:

Alternatively, let us assume for a moment that the Lord doesn’t want literally anyone at all to perish but desires everyone without exception to come to repentance. The question arises immediately: Why do so many perish? Why do so many never come to repentance? Before you answer, consider that question another way: If God wants to save everyone, why doesn’t he give everyone to the Son? Remember, “Everyone whom the Father gives me will come to me” (John 6:37).

Under an Arminian or semi-Pelagian understanding, 2 Peter 3:9 makes little sense, for then God’s plan is routinely thwarted. He doesn’t want anyone at all to perish—yet innumerable billions will perish. He wants literally everyone to come to repentance—yet innumerable billions have not and will not. The desires and choices of sinful man are more important to God than his own sovereign glory.

Under a Reformed understanding, this passage does make sense. Not a single one of his elect will be lost. Every single one of them will come to repentance. God's own sovereign glory is more important to him than the desires of sinful man. As John Piper said, for God to deny the infinite worth of his own glory “would imply that there is something more valuable outside himself. He would commit idolatry … Where will we find a Rock of integrity in the universe when the heart of God has ceased to value supremely the supremely valuable?”

And when the last one of his elect comes to repentance, then the great Day of the Lord will come.

And no one still has responded to my verses. I guess you all like to ignore scripture that proves this idea false. Cherry picking verses (and misinterpreting them) doesnt make this idea stick.

But everyone is entitled to their opinions. Good luck with you all, i will bow out of this thread.

I noticed Delvianna had to do this quickly before I posted my response.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: David1701
Upvote 0

Delvianna

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2025
1,190
1,378
40
Florida
✟54,846.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Divorced

Matthew 23:37​

“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those who are sent to you! How often I have longed to gather your children together as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you would have none of it!”​

Your Argument:


My Rebuttal:


You will need to read that passage a little more carefully. Jesus did not say, “I have longed to gather you, but you were unwilling.” There is a clear and crucial difference between “you” and “your children.” Think about the immediate context. Jesus had just finished condemning the religious leaders of Jerusalem, “You keep locking people out of the kingdom of heaven! For you neither enter nor permit those trying to enter to go in” (v. 13). This is Christ’s prophetic lament over Jerusalem’s leadership, whose resistance to God’s messengers goes back millennia and includes their hinderance of those under their care.

Romans 11:20-22​

Granted, they were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but fear! For if God did not spare the natural branches, perhaps he will not spare you. Notice therefore the kindness and harshness of God—harshness toward those who have fallen, but God's kindness toward you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off.​

Your Argument:


My Rebuttal:


First, this does not seem related to unconditional election, but to perseverance of the saints—a different letter of the acrostic TULIP.

Second, Romans 11 supports unconditional election. Paul has already said, “God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew” (v. 2), and he explains Israel’s division in terms of election: “The elect obtained it, but the rest were hardened” (v. 7). So whatever “broken off” and “cut off” mean in verses 20–22, they cannot mean that God’s foreknown elect can finally perish.

Third, “unconditional” is not a status; “elect” is (cf. “Paul does not describe their status as unconditional”). Paul is not discussing, here, whether God chose people on the basis of foreseen perseverance. He is warning that visible covenant participants should not presume upon their present standing while persisting in unbelief or arrogance. Totally different issue.

Fourth, the doctrine is unconditional election, not unconditional salvation—whatever that is (cf. “if salvation is entirely unconditional”). Election and salvation are two different things. Election is part of salvation; it is not the same thing as salvation.

2 Peter 3:9​

The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.​

Your Argument:


My Rebuttal:


To whom is Peter writing? He says that God is being patient toward “you,” so who is that? Is it all mankind?

No, his letters contradict that idea. Look at the first sentence of this passage (2 Peter 3:1), where he says this is the “second” letter he has written to them. To whom was his first epistle written? The elect (1 Pet. 1:1-2).

You can even look at the first sentence of this second epistle (2 Peter 1:1). He was talking to “those who through the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ, have been granted a faith just as precious as ours.” Is that all mankind? Clearly not.

If Peter is addressing those whom God has chosen, not all mankind, then how does 2 Peter 3:9 make any sense?

Well, imagine that you have called a staff meeting. As you stand, looking over the people gathered in the conference room, you announce, “We cannot afford to have anyone miss this information, so before I get to what I have to tell you, I need to know if everyone is here.” Obviously you are not asking if all eight billion people on the planet are present in the conference room, and you’re certainly not asking if all people who have existed, do exist, and will ever exist are present. The "anyone" and "everyone" are directly related to the "you" being addressed: your staff members.

The Lord is patient with “you,” Peter said. The Lord doesn’t want to "anyone" of those with whom he is patient to perish but to have "everyone" among his elect to come to repentance. God is patient with you, Peter said, referring to his friends, to whom he had written before, who are chosen by God and receive the apostolic faith. That great day will not come before every last one of you are redeemed.

This understanding gains further support when you read elsewhere in Scripture that God has a select remnant of Israel chosen by grace and a select number of Gentiles. God is not slow in keeping his promise; he is being patient, waiting until that full number of God's chosen has been fulfilled. In other words, the Day of the Lord will not come until all those he has chosen have been born and redeemed. Be patient, and give thanks and glory to God for the salvation of so many.

Additional thoughts:

Alternatively, let us assume for a moment that the Lord doesn’t want literally anyone at all to perish but desires everyone without exception to come to repentance. The question arises immediately: Why do so many perish? Why do so many never come to repentance? Before you answer, consider that question another way: If God wants to save everyone, why doesn’t he give everyone to the Son? Remember, “Everyone whom the Father gives me will come to me” (John 6:37).

Under an Arminian or semi-Pelagian understanding, 2 Peter 3:9 makes little sense, for then God’s plan is routinely thwarted. He doesn’t want anyone at all to perish—yet innumerable billions will perish. He wants literally everyone to come to repentance—yet innumerable billions have not and will not. The desires and choices of sinful man are more important to God than his own sovereign glory.

Under a Reformed understanding, this passage does make sense. Not a single one of his elect will be lost. Every single one of them will come to repentance. God's own sovereign glory is more important to him than the desire of sinful man. As John Piper said, for God to deny the infinite worth of his own glory “would imply that there is something more valuable outside himself. He would commit idolatry … Where will we find a Rock of integrity in the universe when the heart of God has ceased to value supremely the supremely valuable?”

And when the last one of his elect comes to repentance, then the great Day of the Lord will come.



I noticed Delvianna had to do this quickly before I posted my response.
First, its against the rules to use AI and not post you're using AI. 2nd, I dont respond to AI responses. Thats just insulting. Good luck to you.
 
Upvote 0

Brightfame52

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2020
5,681
635
68
Georgia
✟125,375.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Thats so rich considering you wont engage with it and I gave examples. I can give LOTS more scriptures to oppose your doctrine but you cant. Calvaniatic doctrine uses the same handful of verses.

But I guess you guys just dont love the truth and are fine with false doctrine.
Learn to practice what you preach. Criticizing folk for cherry picking verses with your right hand, then turn right around and cherry pick verses with your left hand
 
Upvote 0

Delvianna

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2025
1,190
1,378
40
Florida
✟54,846.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Divorced
Learn to practice what you preach. Criticizing folk for cherry picking verses with your right hand, then turn right around and cherry pick verses with your left hand
You clearly don't understand the meaning cherry picking when I literally said I can provide more scripture and the ones I gave were examples. This is getting stupid.

Again, good luck to you all. I wont respond to this thread anymore.
 
Upvote 0

John Bauer

Reformed
Jul 21, 2022
609
408
Vancouver
✟96,190.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
First, its against the rules to use AI and not post you're using AI. 2nd, I dont respond to AI responses. Thats just insulting. Good luck to you.

I did not use AI. That was over three and a half hours of my own writing—three hours last evening after church (as promised), and half an hour this morning to finish it and do some quick editing.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

David1701

God is good!
Sep 28, 2020
260
108
Aberdeenshire
✟35,961.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Engaged
I love that ! Freewillers...sounds so free.
Free from faith, free from trust in the Lord, free to rely upon their own will, free from humility - yes, freewillers are indeed free! It's just a shame that it's not the kind of freedom that comes through faith in Christ. :(
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
12,329
10,262
66
Martinez
✟1,303,575.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Free from faith, free from trust in the Lord, free to rely upon their own will, free from humility - yes, freewillers are indeed free! It's just a shame that it's not the kind of freedom that comes through faith in Christ. :(
John 8:32
"And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
 
Upvote 0

Brightfame52

Well-Known Member
Dec 14, 2020
5,681
635
68
Georgia
✟125,375.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
First, its against the rules to use AI and not post you're using AI. 2nd, I dont respond to AI responses. Thats just insulting. Good luck to you.
You mean to tell me, after the poster spent all that time and effort to answer your cherry picked verses, this is what you say, good grief. Thats why I rarely explain verses folk go get and demand explanation, its a waste of time.
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
12,329
10,262
66
Martinez
✟1,303,575.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
First, its against the rules to use AI and not post you're using AI. 2nd, I dont respond to AI responses. Thats just insulting. Good luck to you.
My thoughts.....

I dont think he used AI. John Bauer seems to be very knowledgeable in his theology and is able to it articulate clearly. AI will most likely use his contributions in the WWW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Bauer
Upvote 0

David1701

God is good!
Sep 28, 2020
260
108
Aberdeenshire
✟35,961.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Engaged
John 8:32
"And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
Yes - free from sin and free to be led by the Holy Spirit. This is a very different kind of "freedom" from that claimed by freewillism.
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
12,329
10,262
66
Martinez
✟1,303,575.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes - free from sin and free to be led by the Holy Spirit. This is a very different kind of "freedom" from that claimed by freewillism.
This verse is speaking about " truth".
 
Upvote 0

David1701

God is good!
Sep 28, 2020
260
108
Aberdeenshire
✟35,961.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Engaged
This verse is speaking about " truth".
It says that we will know the truth and that the truth will make us free. We have been discussing freedom, so I addressed that aspect of the verse (the result, rather than the means).
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
12,329
10,262
66
Martinez
✟1,303,575.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It says that we will know the truth and that the truth will make us free. We have been discussing freedom, so I addressed that aspect of the verse (the result, rather than the means).
Well, the means must be aligned with God's Will otherwise the result is in vain.
 
Upvote 0