• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Trump says deal with Iran ‘largely negotiated'; Iranian media disputes Strait of Hormuz claims

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
190,635
70,631
Woods
✟6,600,718.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
President Donald Trump said a memorandum of understanding to end the war with Iran had been largely negotiated and would reopen the Strait of Hormuz, while Iranian state-linked media disputed his account of who would control the vital passage.

“An Agreement has been largely negotiated, subject to finalization between the United States of America, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the various other Countries, as listed,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Separately, I had a call with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, of Israel, which, likewise, went very well. Final aspects and details of the Deal are currently being discussed, and will be announced shortly. In addition to many other elements of the Agreement, the Strait of Hormuz will be opened.”

The Iranian news agency Fars reportedearly Sunday that any agreement would allow Iran to manage the strait and said Trump’s assertion about reopening it was "inconsistent with reality."

Continued below.
 

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
4,157
2,468
traveling Asia
✟183,335.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
As it relates to the claims of the titled article, I will share this website that seems to offer and update news on Iran faster than most. I can't say with preciseness the website's political leanings but the reporting of events from both sides seems to be fair in it's "live" blog portion (linked on the front page under "live") and possibly other articles. .
What is interesting is that it reports both on the optimism and pessimism in the Iran conflict and potential for peace.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
190,635
70,631
Woods
✟6,600,718.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
AI overview:

Iran International is considered a widely viewed and influential Persian-language news source, but it is also viewed as a highly polarized outlet with a clear anti-government bias. Its reporting should be consumed critically, as it often reflects the views of the Iranian political opposition in exile.
YouTube·FRANCE 24 English +1

Reliability and Editorial Stance:
  • Independent yet Biased:The network is known for breaking stories out of Iran
    , especially regarding protests and human rights abuses. However, its coverage heavily favors the Iranian opposition and tends to amplify narratives critical of the current Iranian regime.
    • Funding Controversies: The network has faced significant scrutiny over its funding. While Iran Internationalmaintains its editorial independence, investigative reports have revealed that its parent company has received substantial funding from Saudi-affiliated sources. This has led critics to argue that the outlet promotes foreign policy interests that align with Saudi Arabia's historical rivalry with Iran.
      The Guardian +5
Journalistic Standards and Censorship:
  • Regime Censorship: Because of its aggressive coverage of the Iranian regime and its role in broadcasting during domestic protests, the Iranian government has branded Iran International a terrorist organization. Domestic access to the channel is restricted, forcing viewers to rely on satellite dishes or VPNs.
  • Credible Threats: The network's journalists have faced severe security threats, which in 2023 forced the network to relocate its broadcast operations entirely from London to Washington, D.C. after warnings from UK police.
    Facebook·FRANCE 24 English +2
When assessing its coverage, it is best to view Iran International as an important—though partisan—voice in Iranian media. It is highly effective at uncovering information suppressed inside the country, but it is also essential to verify its breaking claims through other reputable, independent news organizations.
 
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
4,157
2,468
traveling Asia
✟183,335.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
AI overview:

Iran International is considered a widely viewed and influential Persian-language news source, but it is also viewed as a highly polarized outlet with a clear anti-government bias. Its reporting should be consumed critically, as it often reflects the views of the Iranian political opposition in exile.
YouTube·FRANCE 24 English +1

Reliability and Editorial Stance:
  • Independent yet Biased:The network is known for breaking stories out of Iran
    , especially regarding protests and human rights abuses. However, its coverage heavily favors the Iranian opposition and tends to amplify narratives critical of the current Iranian regime.
    • Funding Controversies: The network has faced significant scrutiny over its funding. While Iran Internationalmaintains its editorial independence, investigative reports have revealed that its parent company has received substantial funding from Saudi-affiliated sources. This has led critics to argue that the outlet promotes foreign policy interests that align with Saudi Arabia's historical rivalry with Iran.
      The Guardian +5
Journalistic Standards and Censorship:
  • Regime Censorship: Because of its aggressive coverage of the Iranian regime and its role in broadcasting during domestic protests, the Iranian government has branded Iran International a terrorist organization. Domestic access to the channel is restricted, forcing viewers to rely on satellite dishes or VPNs.
  • Credible Threats: The network's journalists have faced severe security threats, which in 2023 forced the network to relocate its broadcast operations entirely from London to Washington, D.C. after warnings from UK police.
    Facebook·FRANCE 24 English +2
When assessing its coverage, it is best to view Iran International as an important—though partisan—voice in Iranian media. It is highly effective at uncovering information suppressed inside the country, but it is also essential to verify its breaking claims through other reputable, independent news organizations.
Thanks for clarifying. I just noticed it posted events on the Iranian side far faster than U.S. news outlets. It's reporting seems fair enough but to me, the U.S. reports somewhat lacking.
 
Upvote 0