• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

AZUZA STREET. REVIVAL OR NOT ?

Aussie52

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2018
427
209
73
Sydney
✟73,378.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The bible says to be filled with the Holy Spirit, seek gifts and deliverance,
is not God or the bible fault people are abusing things for money or something,
i can testify myself that i witnessed God doing awesome things, and experienced the Holy Spirit.
It's the same as blaming i don't know baptists churches, for a bad baptist church, or other churches for bad churches that call themselves the same
Hi NBB,
You appear to keep saying the same things and I am answering them the best way I can. Maybe it's a language problem?
God bless.
 
Upvote 0

NBB

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2013
4,359
2,095
46
Uruguay
✟742,898.00
Country
Uruguay
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hi NBB,
You appear to keep saying the same things and I am answering them the best way I can. Maybe it's a language problem?
God bless.

I just wanted to make clear what i said maybe, because for me the Holy Spirit is everything so i repeat myself.
Pentecostals are the only ones saying it like it is for me.
 
Upvote 0

Aussie52

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2018
427
209
73
Sydney
✟73,378.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I just wanted to make clear what i said maybe, because for me the Holy Spirit is everything so i repeat myself.
Pentecostals are the only ones saying it like it is for me.
' Pentecostals are the only ones saying it like it is for me.'

Maybe you should spend time fellowshipping with non-Pentecostals, you may be very surprised how good it can be.
 

NBB

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2013
4,359
2,095
46
Uruguay
✟742,898.00
Country
Uruguay
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
' Pentecostals are the only ones saying it like it is for me.'

Maybe you should spend time fellowshipping with non-Pentecostals, you may be very surprised how good it can be.

I don't say everyone else is bad at all, i just say like in the bible the "gospel is power of God"
Jesus half ministry was deliverance, people need this more than ever, i don't want to say false things but every other denomination is just ignoring totally this, also the gifts, discernment is so useful, i don't think people can have gifts of the Holy Spirit if they are not filled with him.
And for me is a crime people are ignoring one of the key things in the bible theologies like "everyone gets filled at believing" are doing a lot of harm imo, because people are not receiving like the disciples at pentecost the best that can happen to a person.i am not going to get tired of speaking of being filled with the Holy Spirit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard T
Upvote 0

Aussie52

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2018
427
209
73
Sydney
✟73,378.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Ok. let's take this one thing at a time Yes, Jesus cast out demons in His ministry. It was a part of His bringing in the 'Kingdom of God'. It was rather unique ministry at the time. Mainly to the children of Isreal.
At the Cross, Jesus defeated Satan and his hoards and that victory is ours as born-again Christians because we are 'in Christ'.
The New Testament tells us in several places that we as Christian's have been delivered from the Kingdom of Satan.
What does that mean? It means that although Satan & demons can tempt and oppress us, they are unable to 'demonize' us. They can attack us from without, but they cannot get within us.
This fact calls so-called 'deliverance ministry' into question. The assumption of these deliverance evangelists is that the individual Christian has a demon IN them, thus causing the problem. This is both simplistic and terribly unscriptural. It is plainly not in the Bible. Deliverance ministry has no Bible basis to stand on. The fruit of this practice is that Christians become convinced they have a demon when in fact they don't. This has created great confusion and damage to individuals. The casualty list is long.
I have seen Christian people with mental health problems told; they had a demon. Epileptics told the same. When all the time there was a plain medical reason for their ailments. This kind of thing is a Pastor's nightmare.

As for the 'Baptism of the Spirit', I believe scripture teaches that it is subsequent to one's conversion. A 'second blessing' if you will.
I do not believe, taking the New Testament as a whole, that speaking in tongues is the evidence. A true scriptural Baptism of the Spirit will bring power and heart purity into one's life. The evidence of a Sprit-filled life will be an ever-increasing demonstration of the fruit of the Spirit. It will bring victory over sinning and fill the heart with God's perfect love towards God and those around us.

This is my position.
God bless.
 

Aussie52

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2018
427
209
73
Sydney
✟73,378.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I don't say everyone else is bad at all, i just say like in the bible the "gospel is power of God"
Jesus half ministry was deliverance, people need this more than ever, i don't want to say false things but every other denomination is just ignoring totally this, also the gifts, discernment is so useful, i don't think people can have gifts of the Holy Spirit if they are not filled with him.
And for me is a crime people are ignoring one of the key things in the bible theologies like "everyone gets filled at believing" are doing a lot of harm imo, because people are not receiving like the disciples at pentecost the best that can happen to a person.i am not going to get tired of speaking of being filled with the Holy Spirit.
Hi NBB again.
You wrote that other Christians ignore the gifts of the Spirit. I don' t think that is really true. Many genuine Christians believe that some of the gifts of the Spirit were only for the early Church and are not available now. Many would say the 'sign gifts' e.g. miracles, healings, prophecy and tongues, ceased with the death of the Apostles. This does not mean that miracles and healings don't occur. They still do in answer to the Churches' prayers. Rather, there are now, no persons who operate in these gifts. These Christians believe they have scriptural & historical proof for their views.
Now you may not agree with them, but I believe you must respect their views. After all, it is not a salvation issue.
God bless.
 

The Righterzpen

Jesus is my Shield in any Desert or Storm
Feb 9, 2019
3,558
1,422
55
Western NY
Visit site
✟172,799.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Thirdly. Pentecostals have to take a hard look at their doctrine of 'tongues is the initial evidence of the baptism of the Holy Spirit'.
This doctrine needs to be compared against Scripture in knowing what tongues actually were in the 1st century.

The experiential delivery and reception of a tongue in the 1st century; came from the knowledge that what was being uttered was a known language humans could hear as their native tongue. What's going on today is not a definable human language. It is a phenomenon neuroscience defines as glossolalia. Glossolalia is the production of sounds that have no grammar or syntax, and don't actually produce meaningful words.

Even imaginary languages (like Klingon) the humans have invented for entertainment purposes; have grammar syntax and meaningful words.

Infants when they are learning to talk engage in glossolalia. The reason they do this is because they don't have the cortical development to be able to produce structured speech. The brain's "hardware" hasn't developed yet. So infants and small children mimic the sounds that they hear from the adults around them; until they develop the neural ability to produce intelligible speech, wherewith both a child and the other people around them can understand what is being communicated.

Glossolalia does not do this. Matter of fact; the people who state they are "speaking in tongues", do produce sounds consistent with the language that they naturally speak,(just as babies do) but again; what they are producing has no grammar or syntax, nor does it produce meaningful words.

Studies have been done using functional MRI to map the parts of the brain that are active when one "speaks in tongues" (glossolalia) as opposed to praying in a known language. When praying in a known language the speech centers and frontal cortex where cognitive thought processes are taking place light up. That doesn't happen when someone is engaged in glossolalia. Glossolalia is gibberish. When people engage in glossolalia behavior; they are not speaking in an unknown tongue. They are simply producing gibberish sounds. Biblically, that is not "speaking in tongues". The practice does not match Scripture.

The fMRI results in glossolalia, fire the same parts of the brain as when someone is humming random musical notes. As music (like linguistic speech) also has structure.

So, because this practice does not actually match what happened in Scripture; it is reasonable to conclude that It is a deception. A deception that was prophesied in the New Testament; to come upon church religious activity in the last days. This practice is not evidence of being "filled with the Holy Ghost". We know this because glossolalia and the ecstatic behavior that accompanies it; is also present other religions. We see the same phenomenon in Hindu kundalini, and "spiritus" practices in both Islam and Judaism; as well as it is present in tribal religious practices in places like Africa and South East Asia.

So, until people in Pentecostal churches begin speaking what can be heard as any known human language without ever having learned it; according to Scripture; only then would they actually be "speaking in tongues".
 
  • Like
Reactions: tdidymas

Aussie52

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2018
427
209
73
Sydney
✟73,378.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
This doctrine needs to be compared against Scripture in knowing what tongues actually were in the 1st century.

The experiential delivery and reception of a tongue in the 1st century; came from the knowledge that what was being uttered was a known language humans could hear as their native tongue. What's going on today is not a definable human language. It is a phenomenon neuroscience defines as glossolalia. Glossolalia is the production of sounds that have no grammar or syntax, and don't actually produce meaningful words.

Even imaginary languages (like Klingon) the humans have invented for entertainment purposes; have grammar syntax and meaningful words.

Infants when they are learning to talk engage in glossolalia. The reason they do this is because they don't have the cortical development to be able to produce structured speech. The brain's "hardware" hasn't developed yet. So infants and small children mimic the sounds that they hear from the adults around them; until they develop the neural ability to produce intelligible speech, wherewith both a child and the other people around them can understand what is being communicated.

Glossolalia does not do this. Matter of fact; the people who state they are "speaking in tongues", do produce sounds consistent with the language that they naturally speak,(just as babies do) but again; what they are producing has no grammar or syntax, nor does it produce meaningful words.

Studies have been done using functional MRI to map the parts of the brain that are active when one "speaks in tongues" (glossolalia) as opposed to praying in a known language. When praying in a known language the speech centers and frontal cortex where cognitive thought processes are taking place light up. That doesn't happen when someone is engaged in glossolalia. Glossolalia is gibberish. When people engage in glossolalia behavior; they are not speaking in an unknown tongue. They are simply producing gibberish sounds. Biblically, that is not "speaking in tongues". The practice does not match Scripture.

The fMRI results in glossolalia, fire the same parts of the brain as when someone is humming random musical notes. As music (like linguistic speech) also has structure.

So, because this practice does not actually match what happened in Scripture; it is reasonable to conclude that It is a deception. A deception that was prophesied in the New Testament; to come upon church religious activity in the last days. This practice is not evidence of being "filled with the Holy Ghost". We know this because glossolalia and the ecstatic behavior that accompanies it; is also present other religions. We see the same phenomenon in Hindu kundalini, and "spiritus" practices in both Islam and Judaism; as well as it is present in tribal religious practices in places like Africa and South East Asia.

So, until people in Pentecostal churches begin speaking what can be heard as any known human language without ever having learned it; according to Scripture; only then would they actually be "speaking in tongues".
These are the same as my findings into the subject of 'speaking in tongues'. You are correct, New Testament tongues were, known human languages. What we see today is indeed not the NT experience but what linguists call 'free vocalization'. I avoid the term 'gibberish', it is a loaded term which causes unnecessary offence.
When I look back on my own experience, after a protracted time of seeking God to be filled with the Spirit, the Holy Spirit came to me in a wonderful way. It was as if God had lifted the top off my head and poured His love into my whole being. The immediate result was an overflowing of love toward my fellow Bible College students., a desire to worship, a new hunger for His Word.
Then I got sidetracked. I thought I should have the gift of tongues. I got a hold of Larry Christianson's book, "They Spoke In Tongues" and devoured the contents. I became convinced this was for me. In the book it gives precise instructions on how to speak in tongues. After one asks for the gift, one starts praising God, then 'let's go' and speaks out any sounds that may come. This I did, I stated to utter a few sounds that gradually increased with further use. I became a 'tongue talking' Christian.
As I recall this 'experience', I am highly embarrassed that I believed this was from God and not from of my manufacturing. In the years to come, I helped many get the so-called 'gift of tongues' using essentially the same method .After I left the Pentecostal Movement, I renounced this so-called gift and have never spoken in tongues since.
The tragedy of my experience is that I had a real 'Baptism with the Holy Spirit', with scriptural evidence but unfortunately got sidetracked by the Devil with the 'tongues' issue.
I hope to encourage all to seek and receive the real' Baptism with the Spirit', with its true evidence, more love, more holiness, more purity of heart. Please do not get caught in the 'speaking in tongues 'trap.
God bless.
 

The Righterzpen

Jesus is my Shield in any Desert or Storm
Feb 9, 2019
3,558
1,422
55
Western NY
Visit site
✟172,799.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
These are the same as my findings into the subject of 'speaking in tongues'. You are correct, New Testament tongues were, known human languages. What we see today is indeed not the NT experience but what linguists call 'free vocalization'. I avoid the term 'gibberish', it is a loaded term which causes unnecessary offence.
When I look back on my own experience, after a protracted time of seeking God to be filled with the Spirit, the Holy Spirit came to me in a wonderful way. It was as if God had lifted the top off my head and poured His love into my whole being. The immediate result was an overflowing of love toward my fellow Bible College students., a desire to worship, a new hunger for His Word.
Then I got sidetracked. I thought I should have the gift of tongues. I got a hold of Larry Christianson's book, "They Spoke In Tongues" and devoured the contents. I became convinced this was for me. In the book it gives precise instructions on how to speak in tongues. After one asks for the gift, one starts praising God, then 'let's go' and speaks out any sounds that may come. This I did, I stated to utter a few sounds that gradually increased with further use. I became a 'tongue talking' Christian.
As I recall this 'experience', I am highly embarrassed that I believed this was from God and not from of my manufacturing. In the years to come, I helped many get the so-called 'gift of tongues' using essentially the same method .After I left the Pentecostal Movement, I renounced this so-called gift and have never spoken in tongues since.
The tragedy of my experience is that I had a real 'Baptism with the Holy Spirit', with scriptural evidence but unfortunately got sidetracked by the Devil with the 'tongues' issue.
I hope to encourage all to seek and receive the real' Baptism with the Spirit', with its true evidence, more love, more holiness, more purity of heart. Please do not get caught in the 'speaking in tongues 'trap.
God bless.
It's often hard for us to separate our desires and experience from what is sound Biblical truth; particularly if we aren't real clear on what is sound Biblical truth to begin with. (And ironically, this really has nothing to do with intellectual knowledge of the Bible.)

I remember early on in my exploration of the question of "How does God actually work?" I was sitting on a swing at a playground praying; asking God to "show me a sign" that He was hearing my pleas for His assistance in my life. And a bird flew over me and landed in the tree above me. And me, being my silly teenage self thought: "Oh a sign from God! Yeah!" So got up off the swing and happily "skipped" back to my grandma's house feeling like "God hears me." So I went inside and opened my Bible thinking the next thing I read is going to be another "sign".

Well... The first passage I came to was "A wicked and adulterous generation seeks after a sign....." And I was like... "Oh.....uh..."

I read the rest of the verse about the "sign of Jonah and the son of man being in the heart of the earth" and scratched my head over; now what does that mean? And of course it would be months of investigation before I understood what that passage meant; but at the same time, I concluded that whether or not I had genuine faith wasn't something God had to prove to me over and over again. Could I not simply believe without having to be reassured by "signs" everywhere? Genuine rebirth had to be stronger than the fickleness of my emotions.

And there'd be several trials I'd be faced with; worried about my eternity. The next major life event was Desert Storm and of course; being in the military at that point; I was pretty terrified of what was going to happen to me; not only as a result of participating in this war; but what if I didn't survive it? I certainly wasn't secure in believing that if I died right that moment that I wouldn't end up in hell. It would take at least another decade of review and constant reminders of the sufficiency of Christ's atonement before I confidently knew I had been redeemed.

And I came to know not because of some experience; or series of them; but because my life had changed. I now possessed the desire to obey God; which I didn't have before. I didn't do it perfectly. Half the time I didn't know what I was doing; other than just rather muddling through life it seemed, trying to deal with the consequences of all the @$%8 that had happened and depths of human depravity that was no stranger to me.

I was just kind of fuddling along, trying to make the best decisions I could and never really sure if they were "the right decisions"; or just "right enough for now"? None of the decisions were immoral; and some did have "red flags" that I was too afraid to walk away from; but God wasn't there "telling me what to do" either. There were choices He gave me that I still had to make up my own mind. And there were wrong choices I made; but only knew that as the consequences of those choices unfolded.

So, I don't know what you mean by you had a "real baptism with the Holy Spirit"?

My journey has been a lot of praying for wisdom and "leaps of faith" over which bridge to cross and which to burn.

So.... not being intellectual knowledge of Scripture either; what is it?

The best and simplest "explanation" ever demonstrated to me; came from a developmentally disabled resident I worked with in a group home. Her name was Elenor, she was 80 years old and I think was one of the simplest demonstrations of faith I'd ever had the privilege to witness.

I worked overnights at this home and when I'd get residents up in the morning; we'd play silly little trivia games. So one morning my trivia question was: "What was Jesus's occupation?" Some of the residents just shrugged and said "I don't know." but when I asked Elenor she jumped right in and said: "Savior! That was his job; He was the Savior!" I stopped a minute and looked at Elenor and said: "Well.... not the answer I was thinking of; but you're right! You're absolutely right; His job was Savior." She got this great big grin on her face and said. "See! I know. I know Him. I know who He is."

And Yeah, Elenor with an IQ of 60 knew who Jesus is!

She couldn't explain salvation and couldn't give a theological exposition of the Biblical doctrine of the hypostatic union of the incarnation, explain the doctrine of election or anything about the Trinity; but Elenor knew who Jesus is. (Elenor is since passed into His presence; been at least 25 years ago now.)

But that was it. Nothing fancy. Nothing earth shattering. No tongues, prophecy, profound words of Godly wisdom. When ever she had a medical procedure or med change she'd come to the office and ask me to pray for her. No one would ever think Elenor was any giant in the faith. She suffered from depression and cardiac problems. She cried a lot. She missed her parents. Had lived in an institution most her life after he mom died young.

But the most profound example of faith I've ever seen; was from an 80 year old intellectually disabled woman who lived in a group home I worked at.
 

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,723
7,853
62
Montgomery
✟303,960.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
These are the same as my findings into the subject of 'speaking in tongues'. You are correct, New Testament tongues were, known human languages. What we see today is indeed not the NT experience but what linguists call 'free vocalization'. I avoid the term 'gibberish', it is a loaded term which causes unnecessary offence.
When I look back on my own experience, after a protracted time of seeking God to be filled with the Spirit, the Holy Spirit came to me in a wonderful way. It was as if God had lifted the top off my head and poured His love into my whole being. The immediate result was an overflowing of love toward my fellow Bible College students., a desire to worship, a new hunger for His Word.
Then I got sidetracked. I thought I should have the gift of tongues. I got a hold of Larry Christianson's book, "They Spoke In Tongues" and devoured the contents. I became convinced this was for me. In the book it gives precise instructions on how to speak in tongues. After one asks for the gift, one starts praising God, then 'let's go' and speaks out any sounds that may come. This I did, I stated to utter a few sounds that gradually increased with further use. I became a 'tongue talking' Christian.
As I recall this 'experience', I am highly embarrassed that I believed this was from God and not from of my manufacturing. In the years to come, I helped many get the so-called 'gift of tongues' using essentially the same method .After I left the Pentecostal Movement, I renounced this so-called gift and have never spoken in tongues since.
The tragedy of my experience is that I had a real 'Baptism with the Holy Spirit', with scriptural evidence but unfortunately got sidetracked by the Devil with the 'tongues' issue.
I hope to encourage all to seek and receive the real' Baptism with the Spirit', with its true evidence, more love, more holiness, more purity of heart. Please do not get caught in the 'speaking in tongues 'trap.
God bless.
There is a type of tongues that is not a known language
1Co 14:2 - For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands him; however, in the spirit he speaks mysteries.
But I never believed that it was necessary to speak in tongues to be filled with the Spirit. I did have the experience but I always wondered if I was really speaking in tongues or if it was just something I was doing
I know that I received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. That was real
 

Aussie52

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2018
427
209
73
Sydney
✟73,378.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It's often hard for us to separate our desires and experience from what is sound Biblical truth; particularly if we aren't real clear on what is sound Biblical truth to begin with. (And ironically, this really has nothing to do with intellectual knowledge of the Bible.)

I remember early on in my exploration of the question of "How does God actually work?" I was sitting on a swing at a playground praying; asking God to "show me a sign" that He was hearing my pleas for His assistance in my life. And a bird flew over me and landed in the tree above me. And me, being my silly teenage self thought: "Oh a sign from God! Yeah!" So got up off the swing and happily "skipped" back to my grandma's house feeling like "God hears me." So I went inside and opened my Bible thinking the next thing I read is going to be another "sign".

Well... The first passage I came to was "A wicked and adulterous generation seeks after a sign....." And I was like... "Oh.....uh..."

I read the rest of the verse about the "sign of Jonah and the son of man being in the heart of the earth" and scratched my head over; now what does that mean? And of course it would be months of investigation before I understood what that passage meant; but at the same time, I concluded that whether or not I had genuine faith wasn't something God had to prove to me over and over again. Could I not simply believe without having to be reassured by "signs" everywhere? Genuine rebirth had to be stronger than the fickleness of my emotions.

And there'd be several trials I'd be faced with; worried about my eternity. The next major life event was Desert Storm and of course; being in the military at that point; I was pretty terrified of what was going to happen to me; not only as a result of participating in this war; but what if I didn't survive it? I certainly wasn't secure in believing that if I died right that moment that I wouldn't end up in hell. It would take at least another decade of review and constant reminders of the sufficiency of Christ's atonement before I confidently knew I had been redeemed.

And I came to know not because of some experience; or series of them; but because my life had changed. I now possessed the desire to obey God; which I didn't have before. I didn't do it perfectly. Half the time I didn't know what I was doing; other than just rather muddling through life it seemed, trying to deal with the consequences of all the @$%8 that had happened and depths of human depravity that was no stranger to me.

I was just kind of fuddling along, trying to make the best decisions I could and never really sure if they were "the right decisions"; or just "right enough for now"? None of the decisions were immoral; and some did have "red flags" that I was too afraid to walk away from; but God wasn't there "telling me what to do" either. There were choices He gave me that I still had to make up my own mind. And there were wrong choices I made; but only knew that as the consequences of those choices unfolded.

So, I don't know what you mean by you had a "real baptism with the Holy Spirit"?

My journey has been a lot of praying for wisdom and "leaps of faith" over which bridge to cross and which to burn.

So.... not being intellectual knowledge of Scripture either; what is it?

The best and simplest "explanation" ever demonstrated to me; came from a developmentally disabled resident I worked with in a group home. Her name was Elenor, she was 80 years old and I think was one of the simplest demonstrations of faith I'd ever had the privilege to witness.

I worked overnights at this home and when I'd get residents up in the morning; we'd play silly little trivia games. So one morning my trivia question was: "What was Jesus's occupation?" Some of the residents just shrugged and said "I don't know." but when I asked Elenor she jumped right in and said: "Savior! That was his job; He was the Savior!" I stopped a minute and looked at Elenor and said: "Well.... not the answer I was thinking of; but you're right! You're absolutely right; His job was Savior." She got this great big grin on her face and said. "See! I know. I know Him. I know who He is."

And Yeah, Elenor with an IQ of 60 knew who Jesus is!

She couldn't explain salvation and couldn't give a theological exposition of the Biblical doctrine of the hypostatic union of the incarnation, explain the doctrine of election or anything about the Trinity; but Elenor knew who Jesus is. (Elenor is since passed into His presence; been at least 25 years ago now.)

But that was it. Nothing fancy. Nothing earth shattering. No tongues, prophecy, profound words of Godly wisdom. When ever she had a medical procedure or med change she'd come to the office and ask me to pray for her. No one would ever think Elenor was any giant in the faith. She suffered from depression and cardiac problems. She cried a lot. She missed her parents. Had lived in an institution most her life after he mom died young.

But the most profound example of faith I've ever seen; was from an 80 year old intellectually disabled woman who lived in a group home I worked at.
Thanks for your reply and your important question, " What is the real Baptism withe the Holy Spirit"?

The baptism with the Spirit is an initial filling of the believer with the Holy Spirit. It is subsequent to one's conversion and has been called, 'the second blessing' by some. What are some of its results?

We see it first appear among the disciples at Pentecost.
'And being assembled together with them, He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father, which He said, you have heard from Me; for John truly baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.' Acts 1:4,5.

' But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you shall be witnesses to Me.' Acts 1:8a.


So, the 'real' baptism with the Holy Spirit' firstly, brings spiritual power into the heart and life of the believer. This is nothing less than the 'resurrection power of the Lord Jesus Christ'. This is power for both service and power to live out the Christian life.

' So, God, who knows the heart, acknowledging them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.' Acts 15:8,9.

What does it mean, to purify the heart? This is not speaking about forgiveness of sins. Something that is pure is single, without mixture. God did something to the heart, firstly to the Disciples at Pentecost that so changed their lives and again to Cornelius and friends. He removed from their hearts all that was impure, all that was antagonistic to God. In short, He cleansed their hearts from the 'sin principle', the 'root of sin', what Paul calls 'the sin that dwells in me' in Rom 7. Paul calls it 'te hamartia', 'the sin', in Romans 6. The source of our 'sins'. Paul refers to this action of God, to be sanctified 'entirely or wholly" in 1 Thess 5:23.
This is the gateway to a life of holiness. The Baptism with the Holy Spirit clears away all the inward obstacles within the heart so that we might ' serve Him without fear, in holiness and righteousness before Him all the days of our life.' Luke2:74,75.

This is the New Testament 'Baptism with the Spirit'. That which empowers and purifies the Christian that he or she might live a life free from inward and outward sin and grow in spiritual maturity and Christlikeness.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BPPLEE

Aussie52

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2018
427
209
73
Sydney
✟73,378.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There is a type of tongues that is not a known language
1Co 14:2 - For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands him; however, in the spirit he speaks mysteries.
But I never believed that it was necessary to speak in tongues to be filled with the Spirit. I did have the experience but I always wondered if I was really speaking in tongues or if it was just something I was doing
I know that I received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. That was real
We know for sure that the 'speaking in tongues' at Pentecost was human languages, we have no reason to not believe it was human languages at Corinth.
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,723
7,853
62
Montgomery
✟303,960.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We know for sure that the 'speaking in tongues' at Pentecost was human languages, we have no reason to not believe it was human languages at Corinth.
I have no reason to disbelieve the scripture.
1Co 14:1 - Pursue love, and desire spiritual gifts, but especially that you may prophesy.
1Co 14:2 - For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands him; however, in the spirit he speaks mysteries.
1Co 14:3 - But he who prophesies speaks edification and exhortation and comfort to men.
1Co 14:4 - He who speaks in a tongue edifies himself, but he who prophesies edifies the church.
1Co 14:5 - I wish you all spoke with tongues, but even more that you prophesied; for[fn] he who prophesies is greater than he who speaks with tongues, unless indeed he interprets, that the church may receive edification.

Rom 8:26 - Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not whatwe should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for uswith groanings which cannot be uttered.
 
Upvote 0

The Righterzpen

Jesus is my Shield in any Desert or Storm
Feb 9, 2019
3,558
1,422
55
Western NY
Visit site
✟172,799.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
There is a type of tongues that is not a known language
1Co 14:2 - For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God, for no one understands him; however, in the spirit he speaks mysteries.
But I never believed that it was necessary to speak in tongues to be filled with the Spirit. I did have the experience but I always wondered if I was really speaking in tongues or if it was just something I was doing
I know that I received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. That was real
Read the passage you quoted really carefully; and in context. Three verses down (verse 5) it talks about an interpretation. (It's not ultimately unknowable as to what is being communicated. Only that there's no interpreter present. Nor does the passage say that it's not a known (or once known) language either.)

The rest of the verse says that he speaks to God, but none understand because in the Spirit he is speaking mysteries. Scripture also says that Scripture itself is spiritually discerned. (1 Corinthians 2:14)

Jesus also makes this statement to those who sought to kill him: "Why do ye not understand my speech? even because you cannot hear my word." (John 8:43) And it's not likely that they did not literally understand what Jesus was saying.

The Greek word in 1 Corinthians 14 is "glossa"; which is a Greek anatomical term for tongue; though in modern times usually associated with mouth appendages of insects.
 

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,723
7,853
62
Montgomery
✟303,960.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Read the passage you quoted really carefully; and in context. Three verses down (verse 5) it talks about an interpretation. (It's not ultimately unknowable as to what is being communicated. Only that there's no interpreter present. Nor does the passage say that it's not a known (or once known) language either.)

The rest of the verse says that he speaks to God, but none understand because in the Spirit he is speaking mysteries. Scripture also says that Scripture itself is spiritually discerned. (1 Corinthians 2:14)

Jesus also makes this statement to those who sought to kill him: "Why do ye not understand my speech? even because you cannot hear my word." (John 8:43) And it's not likely that they did not literally understand what Jesus was saying.

The Greek word in 1 Corinthians 14 is "glossa"; which is a Greek anatomical term for tongue; though in modern times usually associated with mouth appendages of insects.
Rom 8:26 - Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not whatwe should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for uswith groanings which cannot be uttered.
 
Upvote 0

Aussie52

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2018
427
209
73
Sydney
✟73,378.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Rom 8:26 - Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not whatwe should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for uswith groanings which cannot be uttered.
With all due respect, the 'groanings' mentioned here by Paul is not 'tongues'. The Holy Spirit groans, men speak in tongues. Two different things.
 

The Righterzpen

Jesus is my Shield in any Desert or Storm
Feb 9, 2019
3,558
1,422
55
Western NY
Visit site
✟172,799.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Thanks for your reply and your important question, " What is the real Baptism withe the Holy Spirit"?

The baptism with the Spirit is an initial filling of the believer with the Holy Spirit. It is subsequent to one's conversion and has been called, 'the second blessing' by some. What are some of its results?

We see it first appear among the disciples at Pentecost.
'And being assembled together with them, He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father, which He said, you have heard from Me; for John truly baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.' Acts 1:4,5.

' But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you shall be witnesses to Me.' Acts 1:8a.


So, the 'real' baptism with the Holy Spirit' firstly, brings spiritual power into the heart and life of the believer. This is nothing less than the 'resurrection power of the Lord Jesus Christ'. This is power for both service and power to live out the Christian life.

' So, God, who knows the heart, acknowledging them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.' Acts 15:8,9.

What does it mean, to purify the heart? This is not speaking about forgiveness of sins. Something that is pure is single, without mixture. God did something to the heart, firstly to the Disciples at Pentecost that so changed their lives and again to Cornelius and friends. He removed from their hearts all that was impure, all that was antagonistic to God. In short, He cleansed their hearts from the 'sin principle', the 'root of sin', what Paul calls 'the sin that dwells in me' in Rom 7. Paul calls it 'te hamartia', 'the sin', in Romans 6. The source of our 'sins'. Paul refers to this action of God, to be sanctified 'entirely or wholly" in 1 Thess 5:23.
This is the gateway to a life of holiness. The Baptism with the Holy Spirit clears away all the inward obstacles within the heart so that we might ' serve Him without fear, in holiness and righteousness before Him all the days of our life.' Luke2:74,75.

This is the New Testament 'Baptism with the Spirit'. That which empowers and purifies the Christian that he or she might live a life free from inward and outward sin and grow in spiritual maturity and Christlikeness.
I don't know how familiar you are with late 18th century history and where the "holiness movement" came from and what they believed? But what you are saying comes out of developments of 18th and 19th century post Wesleyan theology; and makes extrapolations upon Scripture that is not sound.

This all comes off of ideas that came out of the Great Awakening. (1740-1790)

The Wesleyan movement (1750 - 1800) believed that regeneration came before sanctification and that "the 2nd work of grace" was that "entire sanctification"; where one's heart was "cleansed from original sin" and the heart was "perfected in love" and thus enabled believers to live without the desire to sin.

This was still "technically" within the bounds of protestant Biblical orthodoxy; but was really close to stepping over the edge. Because stating that one can be cleansed from "original sin" negates the reality that "original sin" is the fallen nature that we all inherit from Adam. Thus why: "through one man sin entered...." Roman Catholicism has a similar belief that baptizing infants cleanses them from original sin. Of which the Reformation had a difficult time extracting themselves from that concept. Thus the development of the concept of "covenant theology".

Now I do agree with Wesley that the indwelling of the Holy Spirit does mean that believers can live without the desire to sin. Yet the desire to not sin and the sin nature are two different things. One of the consequences of regeneration is that sin bothers believers.

Out of Wesleyan theology came the holiness movement; which was about 100 years later.

The "holiness movement" started with Phoebe Palmer (1840 - 1870) who was the first to coin the term "baptism in the Spirit" and believed this enabled adherents to live without sin. (Which is heresy. It's not possible for Christians to not sin this side of the grave.) "For if we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us" (1 John 1:8)

Now I know a lot of Pentecostals say they can live without sin; and this is part of the problem. (Since I believe I have the power of the Holy Spirit and am without sin than what I'm doing can't be sin; = even though by all Scriptural definition the questioned behavior is sin.) And thus why there's so much abuse and adultery and fornication etc in pentecostalism. It's part of the heresy of the belief system. Not just "bad eggs" but bad theology leads to bad outcomes.

Now, I don't know if this is what you believe; but it's likely what you've been taught.

Now, what's the difference between the Apostles and Christians post closing of the canon of Scripture? Since revelation is no longer coming seeing how the entire salvation plan has been revealed; the sign gifts have ceased. And they've ceased because they were the evidence to the "Jew requires a sign" that the apostles were ordained by God to not just show forth the testimony of Christ; but to complete the penning of Scripture.

All the era that contained "the Jews" which was from Moses until the OT system was taken down and the entire canon of Scripture was complete. All of that consisted of that "age" or "eon" in the Greek.

So when Paul talks about "the sin that dwells within" him; he never states that that ever goes away. It will never go away this side of the grave because the world we live in is subject to corruption and has been since the fall. There's no way we can get around that. And this is why Christ was conceived by the Holy Spirit.

Jesus wasn't just a sinless mortal. The SON (2nd person of the Trinity) took on human nature (the son) and these two natures are inseparably joined in one entity. And his death was the "tearing of the veil of the flesh". The human nature is limited by a temporal existence. The "son" is not from everlasting to everlasting, even though the SON is. The "son" is also mortal. (He can die.) The SON on the other hand can not die. (One of the definitions of being "immortal".

So, what is the indwelling of the Holy Spirit; particularly as that applies to us post closing of the canon?

Yes, the power of God to raise sinners from their dead state is still in action. We are given a new heart; but we still possess the old nature; which still sins. And this will remain the case until the bodily resurrection at the end of time. And thus a very important theological reason as to why Christ HAD to rise from the dead. The redemption plan does not exclude the material world. If it was simply "the saving of the soul" would there be a need for the incarnation even? Christ wasn't incarnated as only a human soul though. Thus the completed redemption includes the body.
 

The Righterzpen

Jesus is my Shield in any Desert or Storm
Feb 9, 2019
3,558
1,422
55
Western NY
Visit site
✟172,799.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Rom 8:26 - Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not whatwe should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for uswith groanings which cannot be uttered.
That is not "speaking in a tongue". The point of "speaking in a tongue" is to proclaim the gospel. One who is a recipient of that gospel need not to proclaim it to God.