Justice Department hits Southern Poverty Law Center with criminal charges; suggests SPLC's paid informants were actually 'manufacturing extremism'

BasedLutheran · Apr 23, 2026

essentialsaltes said:
Right, "field sources".

No, leaders of organizations are not 'field sources'. They literally funded the leaders of these organizations to pursue the goals and actions of these organizations.

essentialsaltes said:
We'll see how the allegations line up with facts under oath.

The facts were clearly enough for a full indictment on multiple charges.

essentialsaltes · Apr 23, 2026

BasedLutheran said:
They literally funded the leaders of these organizations

The precise phrase is "people in various leadership positions". So it's not necessarily the person at the tippy-top of the pyramid running the show.

Always in His Presence · Apr 23, 2026

IMHO, The indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center represents a long-overdue reckoning for an organization that has strayed far from its original civil rights mission. For years, many have raised legitimate concerns about the SPLC's practices—labeling mainstream religious organizations and policy groups as "hate groups" simply for holding traditional values, while apparently funneling millions to individuals within the very extremist movements it claimed to oppose.

The allegations are condemning over $3 million secretly paid to leaders of groups like the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazi organizations, hidden through shell companies and fictitious bank accounts. If these charges prove true, the SPLC wasn't dismantling hate—it was subsidizing it while collecting donations from well-meaning Americans who believed their money fought extremism.

This isn't "weaponization" of the Justice Department, as the SPLC's defenders claim. The investigation began under the Biden administration. Career prosecutors in Alabama brought these charges before a federal grand jury. The facts led here.

The SPLC long enjoyed immunity from scrutiny, protected by media allies who treated its designations as gospel. But nonprofits don't get a pass on bank fraud and money laundering simply because they wrap themselves in civil rights rhetoric. Equal justice means accountability for everyone—even organizations that spent decades positioning themselves as arbiters of who belongs in polite society. No one is above the law.

Pommer · Apr 23, 2026

Always in His Presence said:
IMHO, The indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center represents a long-overdue reckoning for an organization that has strayed far from its original civil rights mission. For years, many have raised legitimate concerns about the SPLC's practices—labeling mainstream religious organizations and policy groups as "hate groups" simply for holding traditional values, while apparently funneling millions to individuals within the very extremist movements it claimed to oppose.

The allegations are condemning over $3 million secretly paid to leaders of groups like the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazi organizations, hidden through shell companies and fictitious bank accounts. If these charges prove true, the SPLC wasn't dismantling hate—it was subsidizing it while collecting donations from well-meaning Americans who believed their money fought extremism.

This isn't "weaponization" of the Justice Department, as the SPLC's defenders claim. The investigation began under the Biden administration. Career prosecutors in Alabama brought these charges before a federal grand jury. The facts led here.

The SPLC long enjoyed immunity from scrutiny, protected by media allies who treated its designations as gospel. But nonprofits don't get a pass on bank fraud and money laundering simply because they wrap themselves in civil rights rhetoric. Equal justice means accountability for everyone—even organizations that spent decades positioning themselves as arbiters of who belongs in polite society. No one is above the law.

View attachment 378808

I dunno, it kind of sounds like SPLC funds were used to keep members of groups (that they were monitoring) in good standing by paying dues and whatnot.
Unless the government is alleging that the SPLC is a mere front for “hate groups”, I don’t understand how this “wire-fraud” occurred.

Always in His Presence · Apr 23, 2026

Federal Grand Jury Charges Southern Poverty Law Center for Wire Fraud, False Statements, and Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering

According to the indictment, the objective of the scheme and artifice was to obtain money via donations through materially false representations and omissions about what the donated funds would be used for.

In order to covertly pay the individuals, the SPLC opened bank accounts connected to a series of fictitious entities. The covert nature of the accounts allowed the SPLC to disguise the true nature, source, ownership, and control of the fraudulently obtained donated money the SPLC paid the individuals. In order to keep the scheme going, the SPLC made a series of false statements related to the operation of the accounts.

Say it aint so · Apr 24, 2026

Pommer said:
I dunno, it kind of sounds like SPLC funds were used to keep members of groups (that they were monitoring) in good standing by paying dues and whatnot.
Unless the government is alleging that the SPLC is a mere front for “hate groups”, I don’t understand how this “wire-fraud” occurred.

It's a nutso claim. According to DOJ, SPLC used paid informants, no different than law enforcement, to infiltrate and destroy hate groups via gathered information. So to this short bus DOJ, if for example US Intel paid Al Qaida informants, then the US through paying informants is "utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes." And to the Trump DOJ, to use that Al Qaida example again, US intel is "manufacturing ~~racism~~ terrorism to justify its existence.

There is no length they will go to in debasing themselves in stupidty all for the sake of the audience of one.

camille70 · Apr 24, 2026

Always in His Presence said:
must be - look at who they are doing business with!

Between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC secretly funneled more than $3 million in donated funds to individuals who were associated with various violent extremist groups including:

Ku Klux Klan

United Klans of America

Unite the Right

National Alliance

National Socialist Movement

Aryan Nations affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club

National Socialist Party of America (American Nazi Party)

American Front

According to the indictment, the objective of the scheme and artifice was to obtain money via donations through materially false representations and omissions about what the donated funds would be used for.

So are we now in agreement these groups and what they promote are not good? That they are actually hate groups?

hedrick · Apr 24, 2026

Given the announced policy of retribution by trump, it’s not hard to see this as political. However the NY Times noted that the investigation started under Biden, and is being done by career staff. It may turn out that there actually is a problem. I’m going to wait to hear more.

Elongated · Apr 24, 2026

Say it aint so said:
Is it me, or is there a trend with the Trump DOJ as far a who is gone after, and who is protected?

This activity bears a closer look. The SPLC isn’t a law enforcement agency (Many people are saying the same thing about the DOJ, LOL). This type conduct seems sketchy at first glance.

BUT ……

Pam Bondi's "Dow over 50,000" Deflection Floods The Meme Market

Attorney General Pam Bondi's furious outburst over the Epstein files at a committee hearing resulted in a flurry of memes about the Dow.

dailydot.com

Say it aint so · Apr 24, 2026

hedrick said:
Given the announced policy of retribution by trump, it’s not hard to see this as political. However the NY Times noted that the investigation started under Biden, and is being done by career staff. It may turn out that there actually is a problem. I’m going to wait to hear more.

".....NY Times noted that the investigation started under Biden, and is being done by career staff."

I know Todd Blanche had mentioned that.
I can only surmise they have more than what's laid out in the indictment, else I can see why it was dropped.

Say it aint so · Apr 24, 2026

Elongated said:
This activity bears a closer look. The SPLC isn’t a law enforcement agency (Many people are saying the same thing about the DOJ, LOL). This type conduct seems sketchy at first glance.

BUT ……

Pam Bondi's "Dow over 50,000" Deflection Floods The Meme Market

Attorney General Pam Bondi's furious outburst over the Epstein files at a committee hearing resulted in a flurry of memes about the Dow.

dailydot.com

Yes. But there are no criminal codes for "sketchy".

Elongated · Apr 24, 2026

Say it aint so said:
Yes. But there are no criminal codes for "sketchy".

Which is why professional law enforcement agencies have to look at “sketchy”. One could say “suspicious “.

At any rate, this DOJ seems not to consistently operate as an independent agency. Therefore any investigation is “suspect”, IMHO.

perplexed · Apr 27, 2026

Hans Blaster said:
What is quite odd about this indictment on first reading is that the alleged "$3M" of money laundered to these sources is only charged by $14,000 in payments to 6 informants/infiltrators in amounts that would seem entirely consistent of what the SPLC claims they are doing and how the solicit fund from donors.

I could be very wrong about this but there seems to part of the indictment that discusses the $14,000 in wire transfers to 6 people, but the other parts of the indictment discuss millions.

if a US resident made billions by selling fake Ozempic and wired someone $50 dollars in another state to put flyers on cars would it be reasonable to expect a wire fraud section of the federal indictment only discussing the $50 payment because that would make a federal case, there would be another section discussing the billions involved

Hans Blaster · Apr 27, 2026

perplexed said:
I could be very wrong about this but there seems to part of the indictment that discusses the $14,000 in wire transfers to 6 people, but the other parts of the indictment discuss millions.

Those millions are in big round numbers. It makes them rather difficult to believe.

perplexed said:
if a US resident made billions by selling fake Ozempic and wired someone $50 dollars in another state to put flyers on cars would it be reasonable to expect a wire fraud section of the federal indictment only discussing the $50 payment because that would make a federal case, there would be another section discussing the billions involved

I get your point, but I doubt a case of the kind you created would involve only one bank transfer.

iluvatar5150 · Apr 28, 2026

I wonder if any of the detractors of the SPLC actually read the indictment.

Counts 1-6 involve sending money to informants within these hate groups. The DOJ alleges that this activity runs counter to SPLC's claim that they were trying to dismantle/combat those same groups. This claim strikes me as rather specious given that acting as a mole could very well constitute dismantling or combating an organization. That's why law enforcement uses informants.

Counts 7-10 deal with setting up a handful (7) of bank accounts under false pretenses, namely giving bogus info about who owned or controlled the accounts, and then using them to funnel a total of ~$14k to some of the individuals mentioned in counts 1-6. This strikes me as pretty small potatoes, but possibly still illegal.

Count 11 wraps up all the previous counts under the umbrella of money laundering.

I'd point out that Trump pardoned Steve Bannon of his conviction for doing many of the same things alleged here.

essentialsaltes · May 1, 2026

This week, the legal advocacy organization hit back, demanding the court unseal grand jury transcripts — a highly unusual move it says will show the Justice Department lied or failed to present exculpatory evidence, including records of direct cooperation with the FBI to report crimes that the paid sources helped uncover.

[I understand someone from DOJ was on a talk show saying the SPLC had never offered the FBI a tip. If that's what the grand jury were told...]

“The Department of Justice is well aware that the SPLC provided helpful information, through the use of its confidential informants, to law enforcement,” attorney Addy R. Schmitt wrote in a motion to unseal the transcripts. “The Department of Justice also knows that these confidential informants helped law enforcement put violent extremists in jail.”

Legal experts called the indictment “absurd.”

This is “just another example of a larger trend of this administration doing everything it can to help the far right, including hate groups,” said Eric J. Segall, a law professor at Georgia State University.

Segall called it “irresponsible and incredibly unlikely” to suggest the nonprofit was working to benefit hate groups rather than expose their activities.

--turning to the extremist groups

Some are particularly concerned about California, long a hothouse for extremist groups.

“A lot of the ideas that these groups have been promoting have really become mainstreamed and normalized,” the scholar said. “It’s so much more part of the air that we breathe.”

Said Blee: “You can find the most horrific, hardcore, far-right, extremist, racist, misogynist, antisemitic, Islamophobic ideas and conspiracy tales in the most casual glance at X, or most other social media. There’s all kinds of tantalizing ways that it appeals to people, but you can also just stumble into it.”

Just this week, many Californians opened their official state voter guide to find a page-length antisemitic screed by gubernatorial candidate Don J. Grundmann of Santa Clara. The missive included accusations that conservative activist Charlie Kirk was killed by an Israeli bomb and that Jews plan to enslave American Christians

[It is quite a piece of work. He managed to make the statement from gubernatorial candidate LivingForGod AndCountry DeMott the second craziest on the ballot.]

JSRG · May 1, 2026

essentialsaltes said:
This week, the legal advocacy organization hit back, demanding the court unseal grand jury transcripts — a highly unusual move it says will show the Justice Department lied or failed to present exculpatory evidence, including records of direct cooperation with the FBI to report crimes that the paid sources helped uncover.

[I understand someone from DOJ was on a talk show saying the SPLC had never offered the FBI a tip. If that's what the grand jury were told...]

“The Department of Justice is well aware that the SPLC provided helpful information, through the use of its confidential informants, to law enforcement,” attorney Addy R. Schmitt wrote in a motion to unseal the transcripts. “The Department of Justice also knows that these confidential informants helped law enforcement put violent extremists in jail.”

Legal experts called the indictment “absurd.”

This is “just another example of a larger trend of this administration doing everything it can to help the far right, including hate groups,” said Eric J. Segall, a law professor at Georgia State University.

Segall called it “irresponsible and incredibly unlikely” to suggest the nonprofit was working to benefit hate groups rather than expose their activities.

Eric Segall is a liberal and really dislikes Trump, so citing him as evidence of the indictment being absurd is somewhat like getting a quote from Vladimir Putin about how a particular action of the Ukraine government is corrupt. Even if the accusation is true, the person who made it is biased enough that they're just saying what you'd expect them to anyway, and thus their opinion is of little use in proving anything.

Indeed, given the lack of information available presently to the public in regards to the evidence they have, any statement like the one from Segall is premature, as we don't know enough details to conclude whether it is "absurd" or not. Could it be absurd? Sure. Is it? Too early to tell, and as I noted before, the guys who signed their names to the indictment were in their positions at the DOJ before Trump even took office. That doesn't mean there might not have been pressure to bring the case, but it does make me more cautious about judging it than other cases brought against groups or people that Trump doesn't like.

Pommer · May 2, 2026

JSRG said:
While some of the silly prosecutions (e.g. Comey, where they weren't even able to explain how Comey's statement was even a lie) give reason to be skeptical of the ones that Trump was more directly behind, one cannot simply write off the whole DOJ.

I’m sure that there are wide swaths of the DOJ that are functioning normally. But hunting for a crime isn’t quite the same as a crime being committed and then you (the DOJ) finding out about it later.

If the SPLC would like to pay someone to infiltrate a hate group and rise up the command structure, what business of that is any of the government’s?

JSRG · May 2, 2026

Pommer said:
If the SPLC would like to pay someone to infiltrate a hate group and rise up the command structure, what business of that is any of the government’s?

It is if the SPLC is being outwardly dishonest about it, saying they were committed to taking down the groups while financial supporting them. That said, that part of the indictment seems the weakest to me--but it really depends on exactly what the government can prove they did with the money. If the SPLC can prove it was only being used to weaken them from within, they could have a case... but if the government can show they were actually doing things that could be more plausibly considered support (like actually taking actions that would be to the SPLC's benefit) then the part of the indictment is stronger. That's the big thing to me that depends on the evidence they have.

However, regardless of that, if the SPLC did make false statements to banks (another part of the indictment), that seems a stronger charge, as it's something that can be more objectively determined than the more subjective question of what qualifies as or goes against the SPLC's stated missions.

Pommer · May 2, 2026

JSRG said:
It is if the SPLC is being outwardly dishonest about it, saying they were committed to taking down the groups while financial supporting them. That said, that part of the indictment seems the weakest to me--but it really depends on exactly what the government can prove they did with the money. If the SPLC can prove it was only being used to weaken them from within, they could have a case... but if the government can show they were actually doing things that could be more plausibly considered support (like actually taking actions that would be to the SPLC's benefit) then the part of the indictment is stronger. That's the big thing to me that depends on the evidence they have.

The SPLC is certainly free to associate with whatever other political entities it so chooses to associate with (albeit covertly)…can we agree?

If that is true, then the government has no cause to try to bring charges and any evidence collected (from SPLC records) would be inadmissible.

JSRG said:
However, regardless of that, if the SPLC did make false statements to banks (another part of the indictment), that seems a stronger charge, as it's something that can be more objectively determined than the more subjective question of what qualifies as or goes against the SPLC's stated missions.

I am largely ignorant of the “tradecraft” of private entities’ use of subterfuge to infiltrate other private (political) entities, and would have to take this under consideration.

Justice Department hits Southern Poverty Law Center with criminal charges; suggests SPLC's paid informants were actually 'manufacturing extremism'

Active Member

Fact-Based Lifeform

Jesus is the only Way

Future History Slab Carver

Jesus is the only Way

Federal Grand Jury Charges Southern Poverty Law Center for Wire Fraud, False Statements, and Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering​

Well-Known Member

Newbie

Senior Veteran

You can kill people but you can’t kill ideas.

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

You can kill people but you can’t kill ideas.

Senior Member

Reconstruction 3 will come

Well-Known Member

Fact-Based Lifeform

Well-Known Member

Future History Slab Carver

Well-Known Member

Future History Slab Carver

Similar threads

Federal Grand Jury Charges Southern Poverty Law Center for Wire Fraud, False Statements, and Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering