Musk Minions Lock Out Real Employees at Office of Personnel Management

DennisF said:

Evidence of an example of lawfare:

Andrew Bustamante and his wife are ex-CIA with direct experience.
So is another ex-CIA operative, John Kiriakou:

The CIA used it on him. Direct eyewitness testimony.

Click to expand...

Okay. What were the outcomes of the trials?

-- A2SG, allegations are one thing, proving them is another.....

A2SG said:

Okay. What were the outcomes of the trials?

-- A2SG, allegations are one thing, proving them is another.....

Click to expand...

Allegations based on evidence are something. Kiriakou, Bustante, Ray McGovern, Larry C. Johnson, and ex-CIA retired people I know in my locale have additional factual testimony that will never be admitted into a significantly-corrupted U.S. judicial system that protects the guilty. So if you want to seek the truth and stop at the level of court rulings, you have only begun. Added to the list of direct personal testimony to inadmissible facts are ex-military intel people such as Col. Douglas Macgregor, Scott Ritter, and Lt. Col. Daniel Davis.

The present President doesn't follow International Laws. As Bush Jr. said, the U.S. Constitution is just a piece of paper. The U.S. has entered the antinomian phase of collapse. Lawfare is but one symptom.

Take the "red pill" (from the movie The Matrix) and find out what goes on that is outside the control of the Western Epstein-class plutocracy. If you don't believe this last sentence, you haven't taken the red pill. You do this by expanding your knowledgebase by reading such people as Antony C. Sutton, Edwin J. Vieira Jr., Larry Becraft, and the aforementioned ex-spies. And add ex-Mafia Michael Franzese to the list. And this is but a start.

DennisF said:

Allegations based on evidence are something.

Click to expand...

Sure, but that's no guarantee the evidence will be sufficient to garner a conviction. Remember, guilt has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

DennisF said:

Kiriakou, Bustante, Ray McGovern, Larry C. Johnson, and ex-CIA retired people I know in my locale have additional factual testimony that will never be admitted into a significantly-corrupted U.S. judicial system that protects the guilty.

Click to expand...

I have no idea whether or not their testimony might be inadmissible, that's for a judge to decide. But I wouldn't call that corrupt, I'd say the system is set up to ensure that guilt has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt before any punitive action is taken. You may disagree, but I don't think that's a bad thing. As William Blackstone once said, "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."

DennisF said:

So if you want to seek the truth and stop at the level of court rulings, you have only begun. Added to the list of direct personal testimony to inadmissible facts are ex-military intel people such as Col. Douglas Macgregor, Scott Ritter, and Lt. Col. Daniel Davis.

Click to expand...

There are many reasons why a particular testimony could be ruled inadmissible. Most would be entirely valid without having to assume corrupt motives.

DennisF said:

The present President doesn't follow International Laws. As Bush Jr. said, the U.S. Constitution is just a piece of paper. The U.S. has entered the antinomian phase of collapse. Lawfare is but one symptom.

Click to expand...

Trump certain does seem more than willing to use his DOJ to punish his detractors. Fortunately, because of the way our legal system is set up, it hasn't worked, but not for lack of trying.

DennisF said:

Take the "red pill" (from the movie The Matrix) and find out what goes on that is outside the control of the Western Epstein-class plutocracy. If you don't believe this last sentence, you haven't taken the red pill. You do this by expanding your knowledgebase by reading such people as Antony C. Sutton, Edwin J. Vieira Jr., Larry Becraft, and the aforementioned ex-spies. And add ex-Mafia Michael Franzese to the list. And this is but a start.

Click to expand...

Feel free to offer your opinion on these matters all you like. For my part, I'll reserve judgment and presume innocence until guilt has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. I have a tendency not to place a lot of credence on conspiracy theories, even when they come laced with Matrix references.

-- A2SG, good movie, but way overused as a metaphor.....

DennisF said:

Allegations based on evidence are something. Kiriakou, Bustante, Ray McGovern, Larry C. Johnson, and ex-CIA retired people I know in my locale have additional factual testimony that will never be admitted into a significantly-corrupted U.S. judicial system that protects the guilty. So if you want to seek the truth and stop at the level of court rulings, you have only begun.

Click to expand...

I don't know who those people are or what they have to do with this thread, but...

DennisF said:

Added to the list of direct personal testimony to inadmissible facts are ex-military intel people such as Col. Douglas Macgregor, Scott Ritter, and Lt. Col. Daniel Davis.

Click to expand...

I do know the first two of these and ... oh boy .. not a lot of credibility there.

DennisF said:

The present President doesn't follow International Laws. As Bush Jr. said, the U.S. Constitution is just a piece of paper. The U.S. has entered the antinomian phase of collapse. Lawfare is but one symptom.

Take the "red pill" (from the movie The Matrix) and find out what goes on that is outside the control of the Western Epstein-class plutocracy. If you don't believe this last sentence, you haven't taken the red pill.

Click to expand...

You might not be taking the correct pills.

DennisF said:

You do this by expanding your knowledgebase by reading such people as Antony C. Sutton, Edwin J. Vieira Jr., Larry Becraft, and the aforementioned ex-spies.

Click to expand...

I did look up these guys and they are a bit nuts.

DennisF said:

And add ex-Mafia Michael Franzese to the list. And this is but a start.

Click to expand...

Why are we talking about mobsters? What does that have to do with DOGE?