Just in case you need cheering up, professor of accounting practice, Richard Murphy outlines the economic consequences of the war with Iran.
Last edited:
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not gonna happen.Hmm, famine. Wonderful. Thank your President Trump.
How about fewer people die unnecessarily. Have the Iraqi WMD been found yet?Professor of accounting.
What happens if we don't attack Iran?
Don't know. Don't care. Some people like to find out the hard way.
Basically, doing nothing will be much worse than doing something.
How about fewer people die unnecessarily. Have the Iraqi WMD been found yet?
Ah yes base your foreign policy on Grok - that explains how the US government currently works. Given your level of expertise do you think Saddam Hussein was the good guy in the Iran-Iraq war? Who was the aggressor? Whom did the west support? And were the Iraqi WMD ever found after Saddam Hussein was defeated? Which countries has Iran invaded since the fall of the Shah?So once wrong, always wrong on everything for the rest of your life.
Some countries have an agenda of their own. Iran has it's own agenda. I'm pretty sure this is incomprehensible to a lot of people.
If we do nothing, Iran's terror war against America continues.
Here's a post on X that directly shows Iran's terror war on America since the 1979 Iranian Revolution.
"It's from U.S. Congressman Mark Green (@RepMarkGreen), a combat veteran and Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. Posted in June 2025, it frames “Death to America” as Tehran’s actual foreign policy and lists key attacks with casualty figures (sourced from U.S. government reports on Iran as the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism). It has strong engagement (over 2,300 likes and 250K+ views)." (Source: Grok AI)
Iran's theology is based on Twelver Shiism. They wish to hasten the arrival of Mahdi (Antichrist) and the Islamic Jesus (false prophet.) They need a lot of nukes to make that happen in order to produce the chaos required for the Mahdi's arrival.
[20-Jun-2025] Why Iran’s nuclear theology left Israel no choice | Opinion | Premier Christianity
"Behind Iran’s nuclear ambitions lies a dangerous theology that most Westerners are ignorant of, says Dr Michael A. Youssef. He argues Israel’s actions are a necessary attempt to stop a regime that is seeking to hasten Armageddon"
Here is a Grok summary of that article with a heavy focus on Iran's theology:
Key points on Iran's theology driving its agenda (focusing solely on the theological aspects as described in the article and related sources):
This theology, rooted in Twelver eschatology (end-times doctrine), frames Iran's hostility toward Israel and pursuit of power as part of a divine mission to prepare for the Mahdi's return.
- Twelver Shiism as Iran's state religion: Since the Safavid dynasty in 1501, Iran has been centered on Twelver Shiism, the dominant branch of Shia Islam, which believes in a line of twelve divinely appointed Imams descending from Ali (Muhammad's son-in-law and cousin).
- The Twelfth Imam (Mahdi): The core belief is in the Twelfth Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi, who as a child in the 9th century entered occultation (ghaybah, a state of miraculous hiddenness) and remains alive. He is expected to return one day as a messianic figure to defeat evil, establish global justice, and impose Islamic rule worldwide under a Shia caliphate.
- Apocalyptic conditions for the Mahdi's return: Radical factions among Iran's clerical leadership teach that the Mahdi's reappearance requires global chaos, destruction, injustice, and apocalyptic war as prerequisites. Conflict, particularly against oppressors (viewed as Israel and the West), is seen as part of a divine plan to create the necessary turmoil.
- Hastening the end times: Some influential scholars and clerics hold that aggressive actions—including potentially catastrophic conflict—are not just permissible but desirable to hasten the Mahdi's emergence. This creates a theological incentive for escalation, as fulfilling ancient prophecies and ushering in the messianic era outweighs rational self-preservation.
- Implications for deterrence: This belief system undermines traditional nuclear logic (like Mutually Assured Destruction), because certain apocalyptic-minded leaders might view initiating widespread destruction as a sacred duty to accelerate the prophesied events rather than something to avoid.
- Not universal among leaders: While not all in Iran's leadership subscribe to actively hastening the Mahdi through war, the presence and influence of these views within the clerical elite shape the regime's long-term agenda and make it uniquely threatening in Western and Israeli assessments.
I wonder how many protesters have died, and people around the world are being killed, because a terrorist group backed by Iran wants to make a statement of hate.How about fewer people die unnecessarily.
Yep, this is our open aggression and the biggest blunder of my lifetime, and I'm sorry I got caught up in Western propaganda. But Iran, for over 45 years, has unleashed terror around the world since their regime change.Have the Iraqi WMD been found yet?
I did read an eyewitness report casting doubt in the 30,000 figure and there are doubts about how the figure (and similar) were obtained. That doesn't mean it's ok of course but if Israel and/or the US bomb schools with children in, isn't that terror as well?I wonder how many protesters have died, and people around the world are being killed, because a terrorist group backed by Iran wants to make a statement of hate.
Yep, this is our open aggression and the biggest blunder of my lifetime, and I'm sorry I got caught up in Western propaganda. But Iran, for over 45 years, has unleashed terror around the world since their regime change.
I guess these days a little terror is acceptable to get your way.
It's sad that accidents happen in conflicts, but this was due to old targeting data dating back to 2015. We need AI to replace these lazy humans in updating information, especially if Wiki has it.That doesn't mean it's ok of course but if Israel and/or the US bomb schools with children in, isn't that terror as well?
Just in case you need cheering up, professor of accounting practice, Richard Murphy outlines the economic consequences of the war with Iran.
Maybe the west should not have not enabled the overthrow of the secular Mosaddegh government in 1953, or for that matter the overthrow of the secular Najibullah government in Afghanistan. The latter hasn't worked out too well nor did the former.The people of Iran have been paying the price of previous adminstrations lack of fortitude to confront Irans dictatorial suppression, desire to wipe Israel off the map with nuclear weapons and support sissy targeting of innocent lives around the globe.
Those in charge in Iran are rabid dogs and have needed correction for decades.
This lack of resolve has allowed to become a stronger, more difficult issue to deal with.
The western worlds policy of burying their head in the sand and hoping this avoidance would not be noticed while pretending this response is somehow the moral highground has seduced many self righteous cowards.
'Can't we all just get along,' is a fools fantasy.
The revolution in Iran may have been understandable and perhaps a righteous movement, however it resulted in tyranny and death to those who oppose the suppression.
Iran foments terror and supports fanatical militant jihad and believes it is just. There is no reasoning with such tyrants. Attempts to appease them only increases their confidance and capabilities.
Or Iraq, Afghanistan, Libia...Maybe the west should not have not enabled the overthrow of the secular Mosaddegh government in 1953, or for that matter the overthrow of the secular Najibullah government in Afghanistan. The latter hasn't worked out too well nor did the former.
What is victory? Regime change? Why would the next regime be better? A western compliant puppet government might not last. Iran has more reason now to want nukes. Nukes = security from attack.
Where is your evidence about what government in Iran"liberals" want and who defines who is a liberal - you I suppose. Maybe such divisive words don't help much.This is the government liberals wish to continue in Iran.
"Security forces have warned parents of suspected agitators that their children could be jailed or executed,"
I hear you!How about fewer people die unnecessarily. Have the Iraqi WMD been found yet?