"Conservatives Need to Build Institutions that [Care About Accuracy]"

iluvatar5150 said:

I was listening to a podcast recently and was reminded that, once upon a time, Tucker Carlson intended for The Daily Caller to rival the NY Times and had gone so far as to admonish conservatives and conservative media for focusing too much on commentary and not enough on reporting news.

"Why aren't there 25 Fox Newses? There oughta be. Don't just comment on the news. Dig it up and make it."

I've made the same argument here many times - that for all the money and power that exists on the right, they should be able to build rivals to mainstream news and media organizations. But they don't. I've illustrated this fact by pointing to the Ad Fontes Media Bias chart and the gaping hole that is the "Fact reporting" section on the right half of the top of the pyramid. Nearly all of the mainstream liberal outlets live on the left half of that section, while the right half is nearly empty. Virtually all of the popular conservative outlets are farther down the pyramid, where the focus is on opinion and the reliability is questionable.

Carlson was obviously wrong, though. The key to success isn't in reporting facts - failures of newsrooms across the country are testament to that, because, as he rightfully pointed out, reporting is hard and expensive. It also doesn't have much of a market on the right. As he discovered, the key to success is going even further, even harder into opinion and unreliability. Polemics is where the money's at.

Click to expand...

That Guy 11200 said:

A lot of people just want to hear what they, themselves, are already thinking.

Click to expand...

iluvatar5150 said:

Dig it up and make it."

Click to expand...

iluvatar5150 said:

I understand your point, but given the rest of the context, it seems clear to me that what he meant was “report it,” not “invent it.” He was contrasting reporting with commentary. A LOT of conservative media is not original reporting of any sort; it’s compiling bits of reporting done by others and then adding a load of commentary on top of it.

Click to expand...

Maria Billingsley said:

There is a dangerous thing called " yellow journalism ". Digging up and making news is different than digging up and reporting the news. There is a fundamental distinction in media ethics which brings us into the current culture of yellow journalism , a style of reporting that prioritizes sensationalism, crude exaggeration, and "scandal-mongering" over factual accuracy.
Professional, ethical journalism is the act of reporting, which involves investigating existing facts, verifying sources, and presenting a truthful account of events to the public. Today we have a plethora of pundits who have been mistaken as delivering ethical journalism.
Blessings

Click to expand...

Pommer said:

That’s how they can be sure that they’re “correct”, (and “free-thinkers”, oddly enough).

Click to expand...