- Oct 10, 2011
- 24,972
- 5,581
- 47
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Celibate
@FirstlightdawnAnd this should also be stated as: "as we right now know them or understand them right now currently", etc.
Because like some other posters have said (@Hans Blaster and others) it's hard for us to come up with such concepts of not having them at all in situations like before the BB, when we cannot right now conceptualize or understand such things, etc. No one knows what is/was before the BB, if there was something/anything, etc.
"Time" for example, it's hard for us to conceptualize or understand there being "no time", when we can't right now conceptualize of such a thing, etc. Same with "space" as well, or having no spatial dimensions of some kind, etc, it's right now pretty much impossible for us to conceptualize of such things, which is why we can't really talk about what might have been before the BB right now currently, etc. Someday we might be able to probably, or maybe, but just not right now though currently, etc. Everything we right now know/talk about has to be after the BB right now currently, etc. So it's more accurate to say "as we right now know them or understand them right now currently", etc.
God Bless.
Right now, something can only be described/conceptualized as even being a "thing", only if it exists within the dimensions that we right now know about/live in right now currently, etc, and our understanding can't/doesn't/can't go beyond that right now currently, etc. Which limits us to only being able to discuss, only what is after the BB right now currently.
God Bless.
Upvote
0