Trump Wins Again: Final Epstein Docs Nail Huge Dems, Dem Supporters, and Anti-Trumpers - Here Are the Top 7 (Plus 5 Smug Leftist Celebs

NxNW · Monday at 5:42 PM

Servus said:
So really nothing about victims and legal justice then.

Trump & Bondi say that's not important.

chevyontheriver · Monday at 6:56 PM

Hans Blaster said:
Now it is your turn. This thread was a list of "democrats" and no one has defended any of them. Tell us about the "republicans" that you condemn.

Any of them that enjoyed the services and benefits of Epstein's island, be they cabinet secretaries, presidents, advisors, donors, whatever. But then I left that party in 2016 when Trump was nominated, having resisted as best I could his being nominated.

Hans Blaster · Monday at 7:14 PM

chevyontheriver said:
Any of them that enjoyed the services and benefits of Epstein's island, be they cabinet secretaries, presidents, advisors, donors, whatever.

Was that a condemnation or a question?

chevyontheriver said:
But then I left that party in 2016 when Trump was nominated, having resisted as best I could his being nominated.

mmmKay. So what about your party? Does it have any politicians?

ViaCrucis · Monday at 7:35 PM

Larniavc said:
Does that mean raped kids is important again?

According to MAGA? No.

But it is important to "own the libs". Team MAGA doesn't give a rat's fart about the victims.

Always in His Presence · Monday at 8:31 PM

FreeinChrist said:
Raskin will provide the proof. It will come out. He saw it.

Sure he will. Either that or his comments and ridiculous claim will be swept under the rug.

chevyontheriver · Monday at 10:19 PM

Hans Blaster said:
Was that a condemnation or a question?

Did it have a question mark?

Servus · Monday at 10:28 PM

essentialsaltes said:
Rightwingistan has been shouting about them for years. Ask them. Ask Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, who promised all sorts of revelations if they were allowed to run the FBI. And then came up empty-handed.

perplexed said:
It is not remotely difficult to see why it is a big deal.

That doesn't answer the question.

camille70 · Monday at 10:33 PM

Servus said:
That doesn't answer the question.

The DOJ told dems to knock it off when they were trying to get the files because it would imperil the Maxwell case. Then Trump and his surrogates promoted releasing the files, implying it would implicate democrats, then Trump got elected, his surrogates got jobs and suddenly there was no there there.

Servus · Monday at 10:38 PM

FreeinChrist said:
Names? The very short article does not back it up or name names.
In contrast, we are told Trump is listed in the unredacted files over 1 million times.

Only one person has made that claim; D Rep Jamie Raskin.

Servus · Monday at 10:42 PM

camille70 said:
The DOJ told dems to knock it off when they were trying to get the files because it would imperil the Maxwell case. Then Trump and his surrogates promoted releasing the files, implying it would implicate democrats, then Trump got elected, his surrogates got jobs and suddenly there was no there there.

What does there was no there there mean?

FreeinChrist · Monday at 11:01 PM

Servus said:
Only one person has made that claim; D Rep Jamie Raskin.

Bondi said Trump's name was all over the files.

Time should tell, but I suspect Trump will make sure he is eliminated.
There is a report on Trump that the FBI found very credible but it was not followed up

Servus · Monday at 11:13 PM

FreeinChrist said:
Bondi said Trump's name was all over the files.

Time should tell, but I suspect Trump will make sure he is eliminated.
There is a report on Trump that the FBI found very credible but it was not followed up

Which FBI over the last two decades?

perplexed · Monday at 11:16 PM

Servus said:
That doesn't answer the question.

Yes it does, everyone knows pedophiles getting a sweetheart deal is something that should not happen. I am guessing you mean "there is no evidence Trump did anything wrong" instead of there is nothing to make a big deal over.

Servus · Monday at 11:28 PM

perplexed said:
Yes it does, everyone knows pedophiles getting a sweetheart deal is something that should not happen.
I am guessing you mean "there is no evidence Trump did anything wrong" instead of there is nothing to make a big deal over.

I was told the past several administrations have gone over the files and said there are no more charges to be brought. So how can there be sweetheart deal?

essentialsaltes · Monday at 11:30 PM

Servus said:
That doesn't answer the question.

I told you who to ask. Ask Patel and Bongino and their fellow MAGA hats who promoted this issue into the forefront of American politics.

A2SG · Monday at 11:31 PM

Servus said:
The past several administrations have gone over the files and said there are no more charges to be brought.

Which does make one wonder why the Trump administration is finding it so difficult to release the files in their entirety with only the victims names redacted, as dictated by law.

-- A2SG, things that make you go hmmm....

camille70 · Monday at 11:39 PM

Servus said:
What does there was no there there mean?

It means once they got into a position of power to fulfill their promises they said there nothing to see.

So leading up to the election, were they just bluster and keeping people riled up for content years on end to manipulate people and votes to keep the gop vs dem fight going, or are they lying about what is or isn't in the files now?

Either they didn't know what they were talking about then, or they are lying now.

It may not matter though. The DOJ is no longer the only investigation in town.

New Mexico approves comprehensive probe of Epstein’s Zorro Ranch

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/new-mexico-approves-comprehensive-probe-epsteins-zorro-ranch-2026-02-17/

The $2.5 million investigation, which has subpoena power, aims to close gaps in New Mexico law that may have allowed Epstein to operate in the state. The committee starts work on Tuesday, and will deliver interim findings in July and a final report by year-end.

"He was basically doing anything he wanted in this state without any accountability whatsoever," said New Mexico state Representative Andrea Romero, a Democrat, who co-sponsored the initiative.

Testimony to the committee could be used for future prosecutions, she said.
Victim advocates applauded the move, saying Zorro Ranch had been overlooked by federal investigations that focused on Epstein's Caribbean island and New York townhouse.

perplexed · Monday at 11:41 PM

Servus said:
I was told the past several administrations have gone over the files and said there are no more charges to be brought. So how can there be sweetheart deal?

??? so you are happy with how everything was handled???

Servus · Monday at 11:42 PM

essentialsaltes said:
I told you who to ask. Ask Patel and Bongino and their fellow MAGA hats who promoted this issue into the forefront of American politics.

So you're saying that no one in this thread can answer the question of what's all the hoo ha about.

Servus · Monday at 11:50 PM

perplexed said:
??? so you are happy with how everything was handled???

You mean how everything was handled by several administrations over the last two decades? What about all that am I supposed to be happy or unhappy with?

essentialsaltes said:
I have no reason to believe the past several Administrations were lying when they said there are no more charges to be brought.

Therefore I asked: Right. So what's all the hoo ha about then?

So far no one has given a direct cogent answer to that question.

We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Trump Wins Again: Final Epstein Docs Nail Huge Dems, Dem Supporters, and Anti-Trumpers - Here Are the Top 7 (Plus 5 Smug Leftist Celebs

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Call Me Al

Confessional Lutheran

Jesus is the only Way

Well-Known Member

<><

Newbie

<><

<><

CF Advisory team

<><

Senior Member

<><

Fact-Based Lifeform

Gumby

Newbie

Senior Member

<><

<><