Trump Wins Again: Final Epstein Docs Nail Huge Dems, Dem Supporters, and Anti-Trumpers - Here Are the Top 7 (Plus 5 Smug Leftist Celebs

Nithavela · 2026-02-16T10:28:27-0600

chevyontheriver said:
Why didn't the Biden administrator release them? Some really noble reason? Not wanting to attack the other party? C'mon. It's a train wreck for both parties. Or at least it should be if everybody wasn't trying so hard to protect their own. Including the Democrats.

While the people on the left are vocal about wanting people on their side investigated if implicated by the files, people on the right seem in denial about the people on their side appearing in the files.

Say it aint so · 2026-02-16T10:46:26-0600

Servus said:
If the Biden administration had done something with the files in the four years they had them, that wouldn't be an issue now.

Again, why would they? Epstein was dead. Maxwell was on trial and eventually jailed 2020-2024.

chevyontheriver · 2026-02-16T10:48:24-0600

Nithavela said:
While the people on the left are vocal about wanting people on their side investigated if implicated by the files, people on the right seem in denial about the people on their side appearing in the files.

REALLY? I see it as both sides wanting to limit damage to their own people and their own party. Damage for the other guys is fine but circle the wagons to protect who we can of our own. This very thread's title exemplifies that. But the behavior of most on the left seems to be to want to incriminate those on the right to deflect from the damage to their own side. Only a select few seem willing to burn their own. Good for them. Burn 'em all I say. Internationally even.

A2SG · 2026-02-16T10:48:57-0600

chevyontheriver said:
Why didn't the Biden administrator release them? Some really noble reason? Not wanting to attack the other party?

I couldn't say. I imagine it's not normal practice to release old case files to the public. It was Trump who said he'd do it. Then, of course, he didn't.

chevyontheriver said:
C'mon. It's a train wreck for both parties. Or at least it should be if everybody wasn't trying so hard to protect their own. Including the Democrats.

What exactly are Democrats doing to protect anyone?

-- A2SG, they're not in charge of the DOJ at the moment....

Nithavela · 2026-02-16T10:49:14-0600

chevyontheriver said:
REALLY? I see it as both sides wanting to limit damage to their own people and their own party. Damage for the other guys is fine but circle the wagons to protect who we can of our own. This very thread's title exemplifies that. But the behavior of most on the left seems to be to want to incriminate those on the right to deflect from the damage to their own side. Only a select few seem willing to burn their own. Good for them. Burn 'em all I say. Internationally even.

I was talking about people on this forum and this thread specifically.

chevyontheriver · 2026-02-16T10:58:37-0600

Nithavela said:
I was talking about people on this forum and this thread specifically.

So was I. It's true that some are willing to have their own party cleansed of such filth. I think others want to protect their own at all costs. I would like to be wrong on that. I see a lot of partisanship on this issue from both sides.

Servus · 2026-02-16T11:21:09-0600

Say it aint so said:
Again, why would they? Epstein was dead. Maxwell was on trail and eventually jailed 2020-2024.

Okay so the Epstein files aren't important.

Servus · 2026-02-16T11:22:51-0600

7thKeeper said:
What is it with people wanting Ghislaine to go free?

What does that have to do with my post?

Say it aint so · 2026-02-16T11:37:12-0600

Servus said:
Okay so the Epstein files aren't important.

Not till the Trump admin ran on getting to the bottom of everything Epstein.
Then it became a case of "own petard" and then hoist. A self inflicted gun shot.

Servus · 2026-02-16T12:02:06-0600

Say it aint so said:
Not till the Trump admin ran on getting to the bottom of everything Epstein.
Then it became a case of "own petard" and then hoist. A self inflicted gun shot.

That's what makes them important? Okay I guess.

7thKeeper · 2026-02-16T12:08:09-0600

chevyontheriver said:
Why didn't the Biden administrator release them? Some really noble reason? Not wanting to attack the other party? C'mon. It's a train wreck for both parties. Or at least it should be if everybody wasn't trying so hard to protect their own. Including the Democrats.

Because Ghislaines court case was still on going. How do you not know this? This is why I keep wondering why people keep wanting her to get free, because releasing those while the case was still going through the courts would have done that.

essentialsaltes · 2026-02-16T12:13:16-0600

Servus said:
That's what makes them important? Okay I guess.

It makes it an important story within the Republican Party. It has caused a rift with people like MTG heading for the exits due to the flip-flop and stonewalling from the Trump Administration. She stands for probably millions of not-very-smart conspiracy-minded voters who were a part of the GOP coalition.

These people were expecting arrests and trials. Instead they get nothing, and see high-placed members of the Administration mentioned prominently within the Epstein Files. Will they be coming back to vote in November? Certainly not for any promises of locking people up.

Hans Blaster · 2026-02-16T13:07:37-0600

chevyontheriver said:
So was I. It's true that some are willing to have their own party cleansed of such filth. I think others want to protect their own at all costs. I would like to be wrong on that. I see a lot of partisanship on this issue from both sides.

Now it is your turn. This thread was a list of "democrats" and no one has defended any of them. Tell us about the "republicans" that you condemn.

Servus · 2026-02-16T13:27:53-0600

essentialsaltes said:
It makes it an important story within the Republican Party. It has caused a rift with people like MTG heading for the exits due to the flip-flop and stonewalling from the Trump Administration. She stands for probably millions of not-very-smart conspiracy-minded voters who were a part of the GOP coalition.

These people were expecting arrests and trials. Instead they get nothing, and see high-placed members of the Administration mentioned prominently within the Epstein Files. Will they be coming back to vote in November? Certainly not for any promises of locking people up.

So really nothing about victims and legal justice then.

essentialsaltes · 2026-02-16T14:05:35-0600

Servus said:
So really nothing about victims and legal justice then.

I have no reason to believe the past several Administrations were lying when they said there are no more charges to be brought.

Servus · 2026-02-16T14:19:37-0600

essentialsaltes said:
I have no reason to believe the past several Administrations were lying when they said there are no more charges to be brought.

Right. So what's all the hoo ha about then?

essentialsaltes · 2026-02-16T14:28:48-0600

Servus said:
Right. So what's all the hoo ha about then?

Rightwingistan has been shouting about them for years. Ask them. Ask Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, who promised all sorts of revelations if they were allowed to run the FBI. And then came up empty-handed.

Always in His Presence · 2026-02-16T14:39:59-0600

FreeinChrist said:
Shame on them. They need to be investigated.

Same with these fellows - from Google AI:

Les Wexner: The former CEO of L Brands (Victoria's Secret) has been identified as a "potential co-conspirator" in newly unredacted Department of Justice files. Wexner, who was Epstein's primary client for two decades, recently donated over $250,000 to Republican candidates and committees, including the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

Elon Musk: Documents released in February 2026 include emails from 2012 where Musk inquired about "the wildest party" on Epstein's island. Musk, a major donor to Wisconsin Republicans, has denied attending any such parties and called for the prosecution of those who committed crimes.

Peter Thiel: The tech billionaire and prominent GOP donor appears in emails released in November 2025. Epstein reportedly invested roughly $40 million in Thiel's firm, Valar Ventures, in 2015–2016. Thiel confirmed meeting Epstein a few times but denied visiting his private island.

John Paulson: Listed in Epstein's "black book," Paulson is a major donor to the Trump campaign and the NRCC. A spokesperson for Paulson denied any relationship, calling the inclusion of his name a "weak attempt to imply a relationship that never existed".

And there is Howard Lutnick, Steve Bannon, Dr. Mehmet Oz, Stephen Feinberg who is the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Trump administration, and Sec. of the Navy John Phelan, and Fed nominee Kevin Walsh .

And per Pam Bondi, Trump is mentioned all over the files.

and the 1,000,000 times Trump is mentioned - have you forgotten the proof?

FreeinChrist · 2026-02-16T15:32:10-0600

Always in His Presence said:
and the 1,000,000 times Trump is mentioned - have you forgotten the proof?

Pam Bondi said he was all over the files.....of course, now she is suppose to be sure Trump looks good.
And she had a bunch of FBI agents blacking out his name.

Raskin will provide the proof. It will come out. He saw it.

perplexed · 2026-02-16T16:43:35-0600

Servus said:
Right. So what's all the hoo ha about then?

It is not remotely difficult to see why it is a big deal.

We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Trump Wins Again: Final Epstein Docs Nail Huge Dems, Dem Supporters, and Anti-Trumpers - Here Are the Top 7 (Plus 5 Smug Leftist Celebs

you're in charge you can do it just get louis

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Gumby

you're in charge you can do it just get louis

Well-Known Member

<><

<><

Well-Known Member

<><

Venture life, Burn your Dread

Fact-Based Lifeform

Call Me Al

<><

Fact-Based Lifeform

<><

Fact-Based Lifeform

Jesus is the only Way

CF Advisory team

Senior Member