• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

AI using topology explains why Mr Bean's dressing procedure on the beach was impossible.

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
6,182
5,028
✟372,729.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Rowan Atkinson is a comic genius but his dressing habit on the beach would be considered impossible using the mathematics of topology.


I asked ChatGPT-5 "Explain topologically why it is impossible in the video for the man to put his swimming briefs underneath his trousers without removing his trousers."

Think of the situation topologically, not socially .

Model the clothing as surfaces and openings:

  • The trousers form a surface with two leg holes and one waist hole. Once worn, that surface is already threaded onto the body.
  • The swimming briefs are another surface with their own waist and leg holes.
  • The body (legs + torso) acts like a set of solid cylinders passing through these holes.
Now here’s the key topological idea:

1. The trousers are already a fixed embedding​

Once the trousers are on, the body passes through their holes in a specific way. Topologically, this creates a non-removable threading: the legs are already “linked” with the trouser legs.

2. Putting briefs underneath would require a forbidden re-threading​

To get the briefs under the trousers without removing the trousers, the briefs would have to:

  • Pass their leg holes around the legs without crossing the trouser fabric, and
  • Slide into the region between the body and the trousers.
But topologically, that region is not accessible without breaking continuity. You would need to:

  • Either cut the trousers (changing topology), or
  • Temporarily remove a leg from the trouser leg (changing the embedding).
Both are disallowed.

3. Invariant obstruction​

There’s a topological invariant at work here (informally):

  • The ordering of layers along the body is fixed once clothing is donned.
  • You cannot change the order of two closed surfaces along a cylinder without one passing through the other.
Passing through = tearing, cutting, or removing.

4. Intuition in one line​

Once trousers are on, the briefs and trousers are in different isotopy classes relative to the body. No continuous deformation (i.e. no polite motion) can swap their order.

5. Why Mr Bean fails (inevitably)​

Mr Bean is trying to perform an ambient isotopy that changes layering order without removing trousers. Topology says: nice try, impossible.

In short:
You can’t put swimming briefs under trousers already on a body without violating topological continuity.
Comedy ensues because topology always wins.
 

Bradskii

Under the Southern Cross I stand...
Aug 19, 2018
24,761
17,187
73
Bondi
✟417,819.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Rowan Atkinson is a comic genius but his dressing habit on the beach would be considered impossible using the mathematics of topology.


I asked ChatGPT-5 "Explain topologically why it is impossible in the video for the man to put his swimming briefs underneath his trousers without removing his trousers."


You've got too much time on your hands...
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
6,182
5,028
✟372,729.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You've got too much time on your hands...
This site deserves some comic relief particularly after reading the rather disgusting justifications of shooting people based on political beliefs.
As an Australian living rurally I can legally own firearms to shoot vermin not people, carrying arms in public whether concealed or not is an anathema to most people living in countries where gun ownership is not a God given right.
Gun violence has become normalised like driving a car which can lead to collateral damage in the form of death and injury.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Bradskii
Upvote 0