• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Who is the more a victim ? He who tried to to look like one or he that didn't ?

Did Judah die while being a victim ?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Don't know

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2

peter2

Ordinary life contemplative
Oct 10, 2015
1,224
610
56
✟110,122.00
Country
France
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
At a time when censorships are undermining the progress of truth, and even though this thread has never received a response, your moderators have not intervened to lock it.
I thank you and would like to commend your open-mindedness, as I am well aware of how difficult it may be to read.
I plead guilty to impropriety, but I do not claim to be ashamed; that would be to contradict myself, and probably not christian
 
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,549
46,220
69
✟3,207,464.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Hello Pierre (@peter2), I think that there are a number of things to discuss but, first off, I need to make sure that I know who this thread is about,

1. "Judah" - who is the head of one of the 12 Tribes of Israel (and part of the Messianic line) or,​
2. "Judas" - who was one of the original 12 Apostles and also the betrayer of the Lord Jesus.​

I'm assuming that it is #2, Judas, but I thought that I should ask, just to be sure.

Thanks :)

--David
 
Upvote 0

peter2

Ordinary life contemplative
Oct 10, 2015
1,224
610
56
✟110,122.00
Country
France
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
2. "Judas" - who was one of the original 12 Apostles and also the betrayer of the Lord Jesus.
I'm assuming that it is #2, Judas
Hello David
Your assumption is correct
You're welcome
Pierre
 
  • Useful
Reactions: St_Worm2
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,549
46,220
69
✟3,207,464.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Hey Pierre, great, then my next question for you is this, of what or by whom do you (or perhaps others) believe that Judas was victimized?

I suppose that I should also ask, where in the Bible do we find Judas playing the "victim card"?

Thanks :)

God bless you!!

--David
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: peter2
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
39,031
6,654
On the bus to Heaven
✟235,350.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Hi Pierre,

I’m not sure that I would call either Jesus nor Judas a victim. Jesus willingly gave His life for the sins of the world while Judas willfully betrayed Jesus even if he later repented. Maybe I’m missing your point. :wave:
 
  • Like
Reactions: peter2
Upvote 0

peter2

Ordinary life contemplative
Oct 10, 2015
1,224
610
56
✟110,122.00
Country
France
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Hey Pierre, great, then my next question for you is this, of what or by whom do you (or perhaps others) believe that Judas was victimized?
Hello David,
My question is in response to some capricious remarks I have heard on several occasions, the spirit of which was to reproach Jesus for not saving Judah. The people I heard making these remarks gave me the impression that they were using this as an excuse to reject the salvation offered by Our Lord.
I suspect, subjectively, that such talk could lead one to conclude that Judas has the last word when it comes to psychological suffering, just as a suicidal person can inspire this kind of unhealthy empathy, just as the dead can inspire pity in us for having lost their lives.

In the end, I just wanted to testify that, in my opinion, there is a suffering that Jesus faces, and which is not talked about: it is this attitude of making Judas another victim, more of a victim than Jesus. I must tell you that I once came across a book that I did not open. The title of this book was: “The Gospel of Judah.”
I suppose that I should also ask, where in the Bible do we find Judas playing the "victim card"?
Judah does not need to play the victim card, any more than anyone else who is suicidal. Isn't their suicidal tendency enough to inspire compassion?
It is then appropriate to turn to the one who was not asked for his opinion before being crucified.

Jesus offers his life; the suicidal person offers his death.


Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
 
Upvote 0

peter2

Ordinary life contemplative
Oct 10, 2015
1,224
610
56
✟110,122.00
Country
France
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Hi Pierre,

I’m not sure that I would call either Jesus nor Judas a victim. Jesus willingly gave His life for the sins of the world while Judas willfully betrayed Jesus even if he later repented. Maybe I’m missing your point. :wave:
Hello, Hentenza.:)

It's a subjective point.(mine)
For me, i'd say Jesus is victim of our sins
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

peter2

Ordinary life contemplative
Oct 10, 2015
1,224
610
56
✟110,122.00
Country
France
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Good evening all
@David,
Hey Pierre, great, then my next question for you is this, of what or by whom do you (or perhaps others) believe that Judas was victimized?
To give you a little more information about what you asked, David, I would say that I did a Google search right after posting my message. It seems that the Gospel of Judah is not a hoax, or if it is, it is a hoax as old as the scrolls discovered in the 1970s.

In any case, I had always thought that for this gospel to be credible in my eyes, Judah would have had to bear his cross in life, that is, by facing the gaze of the other apostles, and not by fleeing from it in death. Under these conditions, I would have accepted the relevance of this gospel.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
 
Upvote 0

linux.poet

online forums are a game
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Angels Team
CF Senior Ambassador
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2022
7,211
2,871
Poway
✟484,890.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican

MOD HAT ON

This thread has been moved from Testimonies to General Theology.

MOD HAT OFF

 
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,549
46,220
69
✟3,207,464.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
To give you a little more information about what you asked, David, I would say that I did a Google search right after posting my message. It seems that the Gospel of Judah is not a hoax, or if it is, it is a hoax as old as the scrolls discovered in the 1970s.
Hello again Pierre, the Gospel of Judas, which we believe dates back to the middle of the 2nd Century (in part because one of the Early Church Fathers refers to it once), is Gnostic (and also pseudepigraphal, meaning that while it is a work that claims to be written by Judas Iscariot, it was actually written by someone else).

So, it could be considered to be a "hoax" on that basis alone, but (as always) there is more, because what it teaches stands in stark contrast with what the Bible teaches us (about Judas and Jesus), both prophetically (OT), as well as what we are taught about him and who he really was in the NT (by the Lord Jesus and the Apostles). This means that either the Gnostic "Gospel of Judas" is a hoax, or the Bible is, because both accounts cannot be correct!!

Here are a couple of short articles that may interest you concerning this:

It's important to remember that none of the historic Christian churches (nor the Jews) consider any of the Gnostic "gospels" to be Holy Scripture (this includes the Gospel of Judas, of course). The thing is, while we (the entirety of the Christian church, that is) spend much of our time arguing, disagreeing and bickering with one another about this point of doctrine or that one, every now and again we actually agree on something and walk together in lockstep concerning it ... as ONE church, that is :) ... and such is the case with the Gnostic "gospels" (as we have always agreed that they are NOT part of the Holy Scriptures).

In any case, I had always thought that for this gospel to be credible in my eyes, Judah would have had to bear his cross in life, that is, by facing the gaze of the other apostles, and not by fleeing from it in death. Under these conditions, I would have accepted the relevance of this gospel.
That would be another way of arriving at the correct conclusion about the Gospel of Judas, I suppose, but it would also be highly problematic, because if you accept the Gospel of Judas (under certain "conditions", or really, under any "condition") as both true and as Holy Scripture, that would mean that you could no longer accept the Bible as such, because (again) the Bible and the Gospel of Judas do not agree with each other, and both cannot be true.

God bless you!!

--David
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

peter2

Ordinary life contemplative
Oct 10, 2015
1,224
610
56
✟110,122.00
Country
France
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Hello David
Hello again Pierre, the Gospel of Judas, which we believe dates back to the middle of the 2nd Century (in part because one of the Early Church Fathers refers to it once), is Gnostic (and also pseudepigraphal, meaning that while it is a work that claims to be written by Judas Iscariot, it was actually written by someone else).

So, it could be considered to be a "hoax" on that basis alone, but (as always) there is more, because what it teaches stands in stark contrast with what the Bible teaches us (about Judas and Jesus), both prophetically (OT), as well as what we are taught about him and who he really was in the NT (by the Lord Jesus and the Apostles). This means that either the Gnostic "Gospel of Judas" is a hoax, or the Bible is, because both accounts cannot be correct!!
I meant that, in my opinion, these (which i predeedingly wrote) are the prerequisites for this gospel to be worth reading. I haven't read it, and I don't intend to.
It's important to remember that none of the historic Christian churches (nor the Jews) consider any of the Gnostic "gospels" to be Holy Scripture (this includes the Gospel of Judas, of course). The thing is, while we (the entirety of the Christian church, that is) spend much of our time arguing, disagreeing and bickering with one another about this point of doctrine or that one, every now and again we actually agree on something and walk together in lockstep concerning it ... as ONE church, that is :) ... and such is the case with the Gnostic "gospels" (as we have always agreed that they are NOT part of the Holy Scriptures).
You are informative, for me at least. And i'm glad to rejoice with you as we seem indeed to progress convergently
That would be another way of arriving at the correct conclusion about the Gospel of Judas, I suppose, but it would also be highly problematic, because if you accept the Gospel of Judas (under certain "conditions", or really, under any "condition") as both true and as Holy Scripture, that would mean that you could no longer accept the Bible as such, because (again) the Bible and the Gospel of Judas do not agree with each other, and both cannot be true.
Idem. i don't find relevant, nor useful to read this gospel

God bless you also
Pierre

PS Still waiting for your own interpretations on the Lk 18 18-19 thread, and on this one, if you agree
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0