• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Federal agents kill Alex Pretti

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
30,154
9,773
66
✟468,115.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
I sleep alright too and think that Mr Pretti’s death was unnecessary and done illegally.
(How would you expect to sleep if you agreed with my POV?)
You’re certainly free to think he died for doing what he did. We disagree.
Ah, I see. Do you believe I think his death was necessary?
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
30,154
9,773
66
✟468,115.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
No, they are not. 74% doesn't have a criminal conviction.
No one said they did.
Why do they include pending charges? That is not how we would normally assign legal culpability. Do the ones picked up with pending charges still get their day in court before they are deported?
Why not? They got arrested for something they were doing. Sure it doesn't mean they will be convicted. But immigration law does not require that. No where in immigration law does it say you have to be convicted of anything before being deported. Quite frankly if you, as an illegal, are involved in something that causes the police to have probable cause to arrest you, then you should be deported. You are not supposed to be here anyway and the you do something that gives police probable cause to arrest you? Then buh by.

Why should illegals who commit acts that give police probable cause for arrest, be allowed to stay? We put up with Americans who do, but we most certainly don't have to put up with illegals who do. It sounds like your real beef is with the law itself. May you should work hard to get the law changed instead of just complaining we have one.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vambram

Stopped_lurking

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2004
941
396
Kristianstad
✟29,763.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
No one said they did.

Why not? They got arrested for something they were doing. Sure it doesn't mean they will be convicted. But immigration law does not require that. No where in immigration law does it say you have to be convicted of anything before being deported.
I haven't said anything about that. But if you are accused of a criminal offense you should be afforded your day in court. You are not a criminal until you have been convicted normally. Why would you say that 60-70% are criminals, if only 26% have been found to be criminals.
Quite frankly if you, as an illegal, are involved in something that causes the police to have probable cause to arrest you, then you should be deported. You are not supposed to be here anyway and the you do something that gives police probable cause to arrest you? Then buh by.

Why should illegals who commit acts that give police probable cause for arrest, be allowed to stay? We put up with Americans who do, but we most certainly don't have to put up with illegals who do. It sounds like your real beef is with the law itself. May you should work hard to get the law changed instead of just complaining we have one.
My beef is with you painting them as criminals before they have been convicted.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
30,154
9,773
66
✟468,115.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
I haven't said anything about that. But if you are accused of a criminal offense you should be afforded your day in court. You are not a criminal until you have been convicted normally. Why would you say that 60-70% are criminals, if only 26% have been found to be criminals.
You know 100% of them are criminals.

Let's look back at what Noem ACTUALLY said. She said this...

but that is the facts, is that 70% of the people that we have detained have charges against them or have been convicted of charges."

She never claimed rhe 70% were convicted criminals.

She said all of them have committed a crime. And she added thar 70% have committed additional crimes or been arrested for additional crimes.
My beef is with you painting them as criminals before they have been convicted.
They are criminals. 100% of them are. If you break the law and come here illegally then you are a criminal. 70% if the criminals have done additional criminal acts or done other things that cause police to arrest them for probable cause of other criminal acts. If you are an illegal criminal and do stuff that draws police action then, its your own fault for getting caught as an illegal criminal.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vambram

Stopped_lurking

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2004
941
396
Kristianstad
✟29,763.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
You know 100% of them are criminals.

Let's look back at what Noem ACTUALLY said. She said this...

but that is the facts, is that 70% of the people that we have detained have charges against them or have been convicted of charges."

She never claimed rhe 70% were convicted criminals.
YOU claimed it:
And as I said between 60 and 70% ARE criminals.
That is not true, when looking how many have actual criminal convictions.
She said all of them have committed a crime. And she added thar 70% have committed additional crimes or been arrested for additional crimes.

They are criminals. 100% of them are. If you break the law and come here illegally then you are a criminal.
No.
70% if the criminals have done additional criminal acts or done other things that cause police to arrest them for probable cause of other criminal acts. If you are an illegal criminal and do stuff that draws police action then, its your own fault for getting caught as an illegal criminal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
30,154
9,773
66
✟468,115.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

o_mlly

“Behold, I make all things new.”
May 20, 2021
3,570
618
Private
✟143,139.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Is there a point to this philosophing beyond attempting to silence loyal opposition?
More precisely, the point was one of "morality". The attempt was to only "silence" posts that are uncharitable.
 
Upvote 0

Stopped_lurking

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2004
941
396
Kristianstad
✟29,763.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
No I didn't. I never said they were convicted criminals. I said they are criminals.
By what process does one become a criminal if not by conviction of a criminal offense? Does it mean something else in your use of the word?
In fact I will Ammendment my statement. 100% of them are criminals. That is actually more accurate.

Oh? How many are convicted of other offenses?
Eh, if 74% are not convicted of criminal offences wouldn't that be 26%.
No.
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
9,053
6,370
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟497,526.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It isn't a good look to disagree with reality.

If you want to be "far right", fine, but don't think that make centrists into leftists.
I am not the one who is disagreeing with reality.
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
9,053
6,370
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟497,526.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,779
14,598
Earth
✟279,427.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Ah, I see. Do you believe I think his death was necessary?
No, not at all. I think that you think that Mr Pretti’s death was a tragedy and ~90% Mr Pretti’s fault.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
154,267
20,377
USA
✟2,160,034.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
You are the one that narrowed it to pedophiles and murderers for some reason. Why did you leave out everything else? What was your ultimate point then?
So you didn't see "and such"? Didn't figure I needed to post each and every crime.
And I didn't put anything into your mouth. I ASKED questions in order to try and clarify what you said and what you believed. Asking clarifying questions is most certainly NOT putting words in someone's mouth.

He NEVER said he was only going after violent criminals. In fact I remember having a LOT of discussions over rhe reality of mass deportations. He was clear that, that was part of the plan. The left kept telling us that was impossible to do. Why would they do that if mass deportations wasn't actually something?
And as I said between 60 and 70% ARE criminals.
He said "the worst of the worst."


President Donald Trump has pledged to deport “the worst of the worst.”​
Read the next line which I cannot quote because of AP rules. "Dangerous criminals" which includes murderers, rapists and child predators.

You say 60 - 70% are criminals but the site you quoted - The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse- says 74% are not criminals.

Yes some are. In my opinion, those that are complying and have no deportation order, should be allowed to continue. You see, I don't agree with everything that is going on with deportations. Just most of it.

Let me say it again for clarification.

The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a research group that uses Freedom of Information Act requests to analyze government data, charts detention data snapshots taken twice a month. The percentage of immigrants with criminal convictions or pending charges during Trump’s first year in office ranged from 41% to 57%.

Do 70% of all the immigrants detained during Trump’s second term have criminal convictions or pending charges?
The best figures suggest it’s in that ballpark. University of California Los Angeles researchers at the Deportation Data Project collect and publish immigration data received via FOIA requests. A PolitiFact analysis of its data from Jan. 20, 2025, to Oct. 15 found 64% of immigrants who have been detained under Trump’s second term had either a criminal conviction or pending criminal charge.

About 66% of immigrants ICE arrested from Jan. 20, 2025, to Oct. 15 had criminal convictions or pending charges.
Again, from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse:


Screenshot 2026-02-07 134557.png


If they are only focusing on the "worst of the worst", why are they arresting immigrants who are following all the rules for immigration at there meetings with the immigration judges? Why are they targeting children?


Seven years later, families are being separated but in a much different way. With illegal border crossings at their lowest levels in seven decades, a push for mass deportations is dividing families of mixed legal status inside the U.S.​
Federal officials and their local law enforcement partners are detaining tens of thousands of asylum-seekers and migrants. Detainees are moved repeatedly, then deported, or held in poor conditions for weeks or months before asking to go home.​




Cruelty is the point with this current administration.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
31,201
15,663
Seattle
✟1,247,093.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Oh you and your family have had massive amounts of threats and death threats have you?
Those judges sure have. Also election workers who were outed when Trump lied about them. Somehow no one on the MAGA side seems to be leaping to their defense.
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
9,053
6,370
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟497,526.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
9,053
6,370
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟497,526.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,779
14,598
Earth
✟279,427.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
30,154
9,773
66
✟468,115.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
No, not at all. I think that you think that Mr Pretti’s death was a tragedy and ~90% Mr Pretti’s fault.
It was a tragedy. I don't like assigning percentages. Because I don't know all the details of everything. One thing we can say that is 100% true is that had he stayed out of it while carrying a gun, he would be alive today.

If he really wanted to get involved, which he had proven to want to do, then he shoudl have left the gun at home.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,779
14,598
Earth
✟279,427.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
It was a tragedy. I don't like assigning percentages. Because I don't know all the details of everything. One thing we can say that is 100% true is that had he stayed out of it while carrying a gun, he would be alive today.

If he really wanted to get involved, which he had proven to want to do, then he shoudl have left the gun at home.
Maybe ICE isn’t the only “threat” there, in Minneapolis?
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
43,202
23,996
US
✟1,832,192.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
People were doing this with newsgroups in the run-up to the Persian Gulf War.

They're making clever use of a common Internet chat capability, but the article decorates it with lots of military jargon to make it look like something surreptitious. "Military grade surveillance tactic" doesn't even mean anything. Birdwatchers do the same thing.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
30,154
9,773
66
✟468,115.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
By what process does one become a criminal if not by conviction of a criminal offense? Does it mean something else in your use of the word?
I don't think you actually have to be convicted to be a criminal. That is a purely legal standard. I'm sure you have heard of cases where the criminal got away with the crime due to legal loopholes or perhaps a screw up by police. Do you believe every single person that was found not guilty or had a case dismissed was actually innocent of the crime? There have been criminals that were killed before a trial or maybe in the commission of or shortly after the crime and were never found guilty. Does that mean they were not a criminal either?

Also, a illegals are criminals.
Eh, if 74% are not convicted of criminal offences wouldn't that be 26%.
The numbers are different. However, that is irrelevant to the situation. Because you dont know how many if those that were arrested would be convicted. Secondly you don't know how many actually committed the crime and got would get away with it.

So limiting yourself to only those who were actually convicted is putting Americans at risk. I maintain if an illegal does something that gives police probable cause to arrest you, you should be deported. First and foremost because you ARE already a criminal for being here illegally and secondly you shouldn't be doing stuff that gets you arrested.
Yes.
 
Upvote 0