• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

Is Greenland the reward?

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
389
69
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟4,855.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Just speculating here, but it has always seemed to me to be quite ridiculous that the USA announces its intent to annex Greenland without actually doing anything but annoy its allies and the people of Greenland in the process. If they really want it then it would happen, its not as though anyone could stop them.
The resources are there for the taking. The native Greenland people are happy if you had them money and they do not care if you take their resources. We see this in Alaska where people are happy to receive a check every year and they do not really care what you do with their oil.
 
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
389
69
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟4,855.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
It seems that the new US defence strategy includes the assumption that international law does not apply to American annexation of Greenland because it is in the US national interest
If people want to be upset about something, there are real human‑rights abuses happening right now that deserve attention. Look at what has happened in Tibet under Chinese rule. Protests and dissent are often met with force, and reports from human‑rights organizations describe intimidation, military presence, and severe pressure on local communities. These issues rarely get the outrage they deserve, even though the people living there face far harsher conditions than most of us can imagine.
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
23,557
19,421
✟1,550,616.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
If people want to be upset about something, there are real human‑rights abuses happening right now that deserve attention. Look at what has happened in Tibet under Chinese rule. Protests and dissent are often met with force, and reports from human‑rights organizations describe intimidation, military presence, and severe pressure on local communities. These issues rarely get the outrage they deserve, even though the people living there face far harsher conditions than most of us can imagine.
Oppression Olympics time again already?
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
23,557
19,421
✟1,550,616.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
The olympics do start soon this month.
Think the Tibetans will get gold for most oppressed this year? I think it’s a dead heat between North Koreans and Eritreans myself. Are people required to give all other problems a pass until the Kims and Afwerki are out of power?
 
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
389
69
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟4,855.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Think the Tibetans will get gold for most oppressed this year?
I read

The Snow Leopard by Peter Matthiessen​

This is the most famous and enduring book ever written about snow leopards in the Himalayan/Tibetan region. It documents Matthiessen’s 1973 expedition with biologist George Schaller into the Dolpo region on the Tibetan Plateau, searching for the elusive snow leopard while also exploring Tibetan culture and spirituality.

Even my brother knows him. They studied in the same monastery. It is a shame that China ruined Tibet when they put that train in. Then they bring in the soldiers and the girls that follow the soldiers. Is nothing sacred anymore?
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
23,557
19,421
✟1,550,616.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

Admirable.

The Snow Leopard by Peter Matthiessen​

This is the most famous and enduring book ever written about snow leopards in the Himalayan/Tibetan region. It documents Matthiessen’s 1973 expedition with biologist George Schaller into the Dolpo region on the Tibetan Plateau, searching for the elusive snow leopard while also exploring Tibetan culture and spirituality.

Even my brother knows him. They studied in the same monastery. It is a shame that China ruined Tibet when they put that train in. Then they bring in the soldiers and the girls that follow the soldiers. Is nothing sacred anymore?
Not a very convincing campaign for gold there but it has worked to shift the thread from the presidents fool’s errand of expansionism.
 
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
389
69
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟4,855.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Admirable.


Not a very convincing campaign for gold there but it has worked to shift the thread from the presidents fool’s errand of expansionism.
“I’m not trying to be pro‑ or anti‑Trump here. My concern is about justice and how smaller or Indigenous communities are treated when powerful nations want their resources. History gives us examples like Alaska, where many Native groups negotiated terms and benefited, and Tibet, where the people were overrun and lost their autonomy. My point is simply that God’s justice doesn’t allow payola or exploitation. Any future dealings—whether with Greenland or anywhere else—should honor the people who live on the land. And in the Kingdom Age, all systems of exploitation will be done away with.”

  • bribery
  • favoritism
  • back‑room deals
  • influence purchased by wealth, status, or connections
God’s justice categorically excludes all of it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
23,557
19,421
✟1,550,616.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
“I’m not trying to be pro‑ or anti‑Trump here. My concern is about justice and how smaller or Indigenous communities are treated when powerful nations want their resources. History gives us examples like Alaska, where many Native groups negotiated terms and benefited, and Tibet, where the people were overrun and lost their autonomy. My point is simply that God’s justice doesn’t allow payola or exploitation.

Yet here we are.

Any future dealings—whether with Greenland or anywhere else—should honor the people who live on the land.

From your previous posts that means shut up and take it so long as there is a check coming. I don't see how it would even out with the Greenlanders on the take the check front as whatever remittances are given for the extraction of their resources are unlikely to be cover the short fall of the removal of the Danish welfare state. Not to mention the laughable idea that US companies will have their profits skimmed after a war of conquest or forced land deal to get them access to Greenland.

And in the Kingdom Age, all systems of exploitation will be done away with.”

  • bribery
  • favoritism
  • back‑room deals
  • influence purchased by wealth, status, or connections
God’s justice categorically excludes all of it.

Right around the corner I am sure. Just like fusion power.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
43,269
23,935
US
✟1,839,032.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
“I’m not trying to be pro‑ or anti‑Trump here. My concern is about justice and how smaller or Indigenous communities are treated when powerful nations want their resources. History gives us examples like Alaska, where many Native groups negotiated terms and benefited, and Tibet, where the people were overrun and lost their autonomy. My point is simply that God’s justice doesn’t allow payola or exploitation. Any future dealings—whether with Greenland or anywhere else—should honor the people who live on the land. And in the Kingdom Age, all systems of exploitation will be done away with.”

  • bribery
  • favoritism
  • back‑room deals
  • influence purchased by wealth, status, or connections
God’s justice categorically excludes all of it.
The first rule is: Keep your mineral rights. Never sell the mineral rights. No matter how much money you're offered up front for a full buy-out, it will be chump change in two generations if you sell your mineral rights.
 
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
389
69
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟4,855.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
The first rule is: Keep your mineral rights. Never sell the mineral rights. No matter how much money you're offered up front for a full buy-out, it will be chump change in two generations if you sell your mineral rights.
When you look at how nations handle land and resources today, you can see how far we’ve drifted from God’s design. Colonial powers took the wealth and left the people with almost nothing, and in places like the Philippines the same families still control the resources generations later. Modern governments do something similar in a different way—federal parks are treated as if the people are the threat, so you can’t even pick up a rock or a leaf without breaking a rule.

The Kingdom Age reverses that entire pattern. God gives the land back to the people He intended to steward it. Inheritance replaces elite control. Stewardship replaces restriction. Instead of citizens being treated like trespassers on their own land, families are restored to their portion and held responsible for its care.

The issue isn’t the rock—it’s the mindset that the land belongs to the system, not the people. The Kingdom restores that order.
 
Upvote 0

sir.dante.esq

Crusader Rabbit
Apr 17, 2024
23
7
69
Sacramento
Visit site
✟21,386.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Is Greenland America's reward for bringing peace between Russia and Ukraine and getting Ukraine to concede land to Russia.

Just speculating here, but it has always seemed to me to be quite ridiculous that the USA announces its intent to annex Greenland without actually doing anything but annoy its allies and the people of Greenland in the process. If they really want it then it would happen, its not as though anyone could stop them.

There are some good strategic reasons to do this:
1) America is better equipped to police this territory against Russian or Chinese incursions than are the Danes even despite recent Danish investment
2) America would gain control of the rare earth resources that global warming is exposing on the island.
3) It fits the Monroe (Donroe) doctrine version of American isolationism favored by Trumps Republicans, securing the continental USA against Great power incursions

There are also some really good reasons not to do this:
1) It would set the USA in direct conflict with another NATO member Denmark and with the wider EU and possibly split the alliance irreparably
2) It is not what the people of Greenland want and so the USA would be storing up trouble for the future as well as sabotaging its international reputation.
3) America could gain most of the military and economic benefits of Greenland's mines and location without annexation.

So why is Trump mouthing off about Greenland while not doing anything. If he loses the midterms I guess this policy gets benched forever but maybe he never thought he would have to wait this long for peace in Ukraine. His plan was make peace, stop excessive Russian advance into Europe, gain a whole bunch of rare earth concessions from the Ukrainians and then as his reward for helping Europe out to get Greenland. With Greenland secured and the Russians and Chinese driven out of Venezuela and Cuba bankrupt, He would have much of the Americas stabilized under USA dominance.

So why hasn't he got a peace deal yet? Is Putin dragging out the war until after the midterms when he thinks he can dictate terms to a weakened Trump and stop Trump taking Greenland also? Obviously this would suit Chinese interests also. Perhaps this would explain that 'hidden something' that Putin appeared to have on Trump that seemed to make Trump consistently pro-Russian and blind to war atrocities. If Greenland was the swap for Russia gaining Ukrainian territory then this explains Putin's apparent leverage over Trump in Alaska and throughout the negotiation process, along with some naughty pictures??!!.

It would also have extremely worrying implications for NATO. It would mean that Trump has always intended to split the alliance but was cool headed enough to understand that he had to secure peace in Ukraine first. He has a stronger negotiation position with Europe on board but after peace he no longer needs them.

This close to a deal in Ukraine is this all nonsense or an explanation why the deal might yet fall through. Just a theory - what do you think`?
does golden dome rely on Greenland as necessary?

Yes, proponents argue Greenland is strategically vital for the "Golden Dome" missile defense system, providing a crucial mid-course interception point and optimal ground station location for space-based sensors due to its polar location, though some analysts contend the system could function differently or that Greenland isn't essential for basic functions like early warning radar, which is already there. The debate centers on whether physical control or just access to facilities like Pituffik Space Base is needed, with current U.S. access under existing agreements.
Why Greenland is Considered Important:
  • Forward-Basing Interceptors: Its location allows for intercepting incoming missiles in their mid-course phase (coasting through space), creating a second line of defense before they reach the U.S. mainland.
  • Space-Based Architecture: It's ideal for ground stations for the satellite network, offering frequent communication with polar-orbiting satellites and clear atmospheric conditions for laser links.
  • Strategic Flight Paths: It sits on the flight paths of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) targeting the U.S. from the Arctic.
Counterarguments & Nuances:
  • Existing Architecture: The existing Upgraded Early Warning Radar at Pituffik (Thule) already provides critical early warning, separate from interceptors.
  • Not Necessarily for Basic Function: Some argue that the core of the system (space-based assets) doesn't require Greenland, and that land-based components could be adjusted,.
  • Access vs. Control: The U.S. currently has military access via the 1951 Greenland Defense Agreement, raising questions about the need for further control.
In essence, Greenland offers significant enhancements for maximizing the Golden Dome's effectiveness, but the necessity hinges on whether the system's goals require its presence as a forward launch/sensor hub, or if existing infrastructure and alternative locations suffice for basic defense.

Safety from "Vladimir Putin" of Russia basically. Anyone remember the old slogan of the '70s "Better dead than Red?" Russian invasion envisioned by the movie "Red Dawn"
 
Upvote 0