Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Unsupported assertions. But I gave you the opportunity to recover. Tell us which of the four points of Darwinian theory have been shown to be false.
What an odd question. We've been here all along.
Darwin obviously didn't know a lot of things we do today (genetics, molecular biology, etc.), but his basic concept of change under selection actually *does* hold up and remains a key core of modern evolutionary theory.
That's a bold claim for someone who wraps his creationism in a cloak of claimed scientific authority.
LOL.
I don't think you are capable of determining the number of geberations needed, Mike.
If you want to look less foolish, try something that isn't so well documented.
Your expressed gross ignorance is growing, Mike. There has been lots of progress on OOL research (and I recall discussing it with you during prior appearances on this board) in the last 50+ years. All of the basic building blocks of the needed chemicals can be built in prebiotic conditions. (Many of them even in molecular clouds and interstellar grains.)
Of course there is. It is called the "proto-cell". If you don't actually know about it already you should go look it up.
Good grief -- information "theory".
Oh my, the argument from dead QM pioneers. No this nonsense again.
There is no evidence for consciousness outside of animal brains.
Belief is useless in science. It is not used. The material world actually exists as our own experience clearly shows.
At least you're not a flerfer. It isn't enough to get you out of your reality hole.
You didn't ask me this question as this message was a reply to others, but if you did ask me I would tell you that I am not a biologist and haven't studied biology in 30 years.
As you should remember, I am a physicist, not a biologist. I do not study evolution, so, I am am not an "evolutionary biologist" or, as you would say, an "evolutionist".
Coming in strong as usual, I see. As this wasn't my message to reply to, I will not take this as a personal insult. (I can wait.)
It helps when you don't invent fantasies about what actual scientists do and know and our knowledge of things.
Try using a capital letter when typing surnames.
Here is a maths free version of Feymamn path integral formulation.
You go from "here" to "there" through "everywhere".
I agree, I think that's the nature of man.
Whilst I laud the fact you actually responded with other than only insults ,
Challenge everyone. He’s not the only mathematician here.
Math describes the pattern, but it doesn’t explain why the pattern exists. When you say, ‘the math decides', you’re treating a description as a cause. Did you mean that, or were you just speaking loosely?
He's more competent than I am. which is what matters.
I don't see that. Tell me about "energy balance." And BTW, you still haven't answered my question. Which of the 4 points of Darwin's theory have been refuted? Show us your evidence.
You are still on about this stupid idiotic nonsense about windmills causing global climate change and the downstream effects being persistent.
