- Oct 2, 2020
- 30,852
- 15,826
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Well now, who can doubt the authenticity of an email from "▆▆▆▆▆▆".
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Trump suggests he’ll release Jeffrey Epstein ‘client list’ if elected: ‘I’d have no problem with it’
- Thread starter HARK!
- Start date
- Oct 2, 2020
- 30,852
- 15,826
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
- Oct 2, 2020
- 30,852
- 15,826
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Then why did you say that questioning one document means completely disregarding the files?
Is it an all or nothing rule? If you question the authenticity of what was written by "█████████" in one out of six million documents, you've disregarded the complete kit and kaboodle?
Upvote
0
- Jul 19, 2012
- 18,835
- 17,512
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Judaism
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
I wonder who is in charge of the administration and who's protecting the people mentioned?
Upvote
0
- Oct 2, 2020
- 30,852
- 15,826
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Protecting them from what? How is what's claimed in the email any worse than the recorded bus conversation?
Someone please tell me that's not the most damaging thing that was found in the Epstein files.
Upvote
0
Larniavc
"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
- Jul 14, 2015
- 16,479
- 9,999
- 53
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- UK-Liberal-Democrats
What I don’t understand is why anyone would not want to be able to examine any and all information that pertains to what potential child rapists did on Child Rape Island.
Upvote
0
- Jul 19, 2012
- 18,835
- 17,512
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Judaism
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Well, there's a long history of questions regarding Epstein and what happened on his island. A still unanswered question is how could someone on sucide watch in a Donald Trump Justice Department cell not be checked on for three hours and have the cameras watching him conveniently fail at the same time.
Upvote
0
- Jan 8, 2016
- 18,428
- 6,825
- 48
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
What can anyone do about it outside the justice department, and why is it important to us regular people at all?
...I'm not against freedom of speech and information, but gaining information, to possibly shame perpetrators or their families seems unnecessary. Releasing these formerly confidential documents seems...unnecessary.
...But we do live in the time of cancel-culture, and radicalized political activism, so maybe we ought to look at ourselves, and judge what we're doing. Right now.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
essentialsaltes
Fact-Based Lifeform
- Oct 17, 2011
- 46,330
- 48,986
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
According to the law, only victims' names are to be redacted. No one else, regardless of station, was to be so protected. So is your take that you don't believe the words of a victim who was on Donald Trump's plane, or you think the DOJ is disobeying the law?
Upvote
0
- Oct 2, 2020
- 30,852
- 15,826
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Not according to what I read about it. Redacting the name of someone who is not a victim is optional, not required. The DOJ would not be breaking the law by doing so, but the Transparency Act does not mandate it.
Not that it matters since the email doesn't say anything of significance.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
- Dec 1, 2011
- 23,559
- 19,422
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
Yeah, can't have our betters feeling shame over raping children.
Upvote
0
essentialsaltes
Fact-Based Lifeform
- Oct 17, 2011
- 46,330
- 48,986
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
(1) No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.
(1) The Attorney general may withhold or redact the segregable portions of records that—
(A) contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
(B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 2252–2252A;
(C) would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary;
(D) depict or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury of any person; or
(E) contain information specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order.
(2) All redactions must be accompanied by a written justification published in the Federal Register and submitted to Congress. [they have not done this]
Upvote
0
funny how the, "Every trans is a pedophile." crowd no longer cares about them, heres my hot take, investigate and charge them all, bill gates, bill clinton, hilary throw the book at them along with banon, trump and musk. Everyone here complaining these files was likely and a few I know, were all for releasing the files and going after it when it was democrats they thought be in there. Now that it's not just democrats, "Well we can't trust it." thats why you investigate, which I don't trust the people in power to do.
Upvote
0
- Oct 2, 2020
- 30,852
- 15,826
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
That doesn't say that the person who sent that email must be a victim since the name was redacted. And again, it doesn't matter because the content of the email doesn't contain anything of significance.
Upvote
0
not to mention just a month ago I remember a topic complaining how there was no interest in bill clinton I think it was being in the epstein files.
Upvote
0
essentialsaltes
Fact-Based Lifeform
- Oct 17, 2011
- 46,330
- 48,986
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
Hard to say whether it's significant, but it lends credence to the proposition that Trump and Melania first met in circumstances within Epstein's orbit and Epstein's claim that Trump and Melania first 'closed the deal' on the Lolita Express.
Upvote
0
- Oct 2, 2020
- 30,852
- 15,826
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
I remember flying back with Donald on his plane the first weekend I went to visit you in Florida was the weekend he met Melania and he kept on coming out of the bedroom saying...
Was Donald's plane the Lolita Express? But even still, what's significant about that? It's common knowledge that Trump and Epstein were friends in 1998.
Upvote
0
essentialsaltes
Fact-Based Lifeform
- Oct 17, 2011
- 46,330
- 48,986
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
Perhaps the Lolita Express is how Donald and Melania arrived at Epstein's place in Florida. And then went back on his own plane.
Well, I realize nobody cares about adultery any more, especially for presidents.
We might have to turn to the conspiracy string board, but the suggestion (by Alan Dershowitz) that Epstein had intelligence connections with a foreign power, and that warranted a light sentence for his procuring minors charge. Add in a dash of people in Epstein's circle making meetings happen between foreign models and rich and influential Americans. And what might that spell?
Upvote
0
Similar threads
- Locked
