- Dec 17, 2010
- 10,245
- 2,723
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
That's a value judgement and assertion - not a decent, substantive argument.
That's an assertion, and a rather rude one.
You're making more assertions.
You asserted that it doesn't matter - but the moment I showed that to some people it DOES matter because he's remaking the Whitehouse in the style of a grand ballroom straight from a Russian Tsar - you get all whiny about "race issues".
I wasn't talking about race.
I was talking about relevance.
I was saying this tacky, racist, womanising, assaulting, fraudulent, tax-avoiding felon of a man lived in a tacky gold cover over-valued "Dictator Chic" apartment - and now wants to model the East Wing after his own image.
Where's the public debate? Where's the Senate inquiry into an appropriate design? Where's the public consultation and competition with various architects? A historical review panel. I thought the grand, imperial government buildings in America were meant to be more styled by Ancient Rome than Rococo.
Oh, you're still going on about irrelevancies. I see.
Well, I guess you've learned from the master?
When you are cornered, just declare victory.
After Carney 's speech at Davos, Trump was backed into a corner.
Too many NATO countries had said no, and sent troops up there.
Carney had declared an anti-American manifesto for the modern world to sign up to!
So what could Trump do?
He declared victory.
And YOU bring up pigeon brains?
He achieved nothing, and America came out of there with vastly LESS than going in!
(Less respect, and soon less trade partners.)
But he declared victory anyway.
Narcissist's gotta narc.
But inside?
Upvote
0
