stevevw
inquisitive
- Nov 4, 2013
- 17,671
- 2,089
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
And I think its exactly what is needed now as a counter to the political and cultural war going on. Which includes many churches becoming political.I’m increasingly convinced that the real issue beneath many of our political, moral, and cultural failures is not simply which system we choose, but whether its guiding mores are genuinely shared rather than imposed.
Any community without commonly held moral commitments will eventually fragment. At a global scale, a world that denies universal moral reference points has no principled way to resist violence or corruption—only temporary power arrangements. History suggests those arrangements do not hold.
This helps explain why the former USSR did not collapse merely because communism was economically flawed, but because Marxist ideals were imposed rather than embraced. Compliance replaced conviction. That moral dissonance was compounded by widespread corruption among the leadership, whose relative luxury stood in stark hypocrisy to the egalitarian ideals they espoused. Once legitimacy was lost, cohesion followed. Capitalism is not immune to the same fate; when it degenerates into crony capitalism and becomes rife with corruption, it too loses moral credibility.
All of this brings us to the God question, and more specifically to Jesus—arguably the most radically counterintuitive moral figure in human history. His teachings invert every instinct of power and survival: strength through weakness, love of enemies, living at peace when possible, going the second mile when coerced to go one. In this sense, Jesus stands even against nature itself, which operates by survival of the fittest. His ethic does not arise from biology, self-interest, or power; it directly contradicts them.
Crucially, Jesus does not impose this moral vision. He invites it. His kingdom advances only where hearts are transformed, never by coercion. That alone sets Him apart from every political ideology. And it may be precisely why His teachings remain both so disruptive—and so enduring.
I think Jesus was neither Left or Right politically. What the Left and Right fundementally represent is Christs truth. Political parties or other groups co op Christs truths and then apply them through the lens of their ideology.
I think fundementally the Left relate more to the idea that Love covers all wrongs. Even overlooking sin and repentence. They can take Christ love too far and try to create an inclusive kingdom on earth rather than in heaven.
Whereas the Right are more traditional. Trying to repeat the same practices and beliefs as tradition. Which at the extreme can mean using religion to control others with threat of punishment from God. Overlooking Christs love and acceptence.
But I find it hard to understand how Christ could be a full Leftist. By its very nature the Left side of politics has to allow ideas that go against Christs Truths and Gods law and order.
So I like the Love and acceptance of the Left and this being tempered by the authority and tradition of the right. A good balance. But there is a lot that cannot apply as primarily this is politics and not religion. Politics can never fully be Christlike by its nature.
Thats why Christ said “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”
Last edited:
Upvote
0