• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

There is only 2 options, Life formed because of God, or by random chance from non-living matter

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,807
6,361
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,198,817.00
Faith
Atheist
The soul comes from God, and science can’t detect God, so of course science can’t detect the soul. Science stays agnostic because the soul isn’t something its tools are designed to measure.
The Earth comes from God, and science can't detect God, so of course science can't detect the Earth...or gravity or the sun the moon and the stars or electrons or...

hilarious
 
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
149
15
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟1,321.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
The Earth comes from God, and science can't detect God, so of course science can't detect the Earth...or gravity or the sun the moon and the stars or electrons or...
We are talking about cause and effect. WE see the effect, we guess at the cause.
 
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
149
15
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟1,321.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
What exactly do you think you detect from a soul?
I don’t think about it in terms of soul at all. A soul is individual, and souls don’t merge or synchronize. What I think about is a kind of universal consciousness — the way people can recognize the same truth at the same time. You see hints of that in To Kill a Mockingbird. People don’t align because their souls blend together. They align when their individual souls respond to the same truth. You maybe thinking of something different from me.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,807
6,361
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,198,817.00
Faith
Atheist
I don’t think about it in terms of soul at all. A soul is individual, and souls don’t merge or synchronize. What I think about is a kind of universal consciousness — the way people can recognize the same truth at the same time. You see hints of that in To Kill a Mockingbird. People don’t align because their souls blend together. They align when their individual souls respond to the same truth. You maybe thinking of something different from me.
I think souls don't exist.
 
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
149
15
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟1,321.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
I think souls don't exist.
So you do not see us as individuals? I am wondering about the Kingdom age because that is something that is collective and may not be individual at all.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,807
6,361
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,198,817.00
Faith
Atheist
So you do not see us as individuals? I am wondering about the Kingdom age because that is something that is collective and may not be individual at all.
I don't see individuality as having anything to do with souls.

(BTW, you realize non-believers can post here, right? You shouldn't assume that "kingdom age" or any other Christian rhetoric is of interest to everyone reading here.)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
24,209
17,813
56
USA
✟459,281.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
So you do not see us as individuals? I am wondering about the Kingdom age because that is something that is collective and may not be individual at all.
Are souls a product of the person? Do they exist outside bodies? Do they survive death? Do they interact with the flesh or are they part of it?

[I ask because "soul" is a very nebulous word as used by many people.]
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,274
6,253
Montreal, Quebec
✟321,187.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
In Hebrew, the word usually translated “soul” is nephesh. In Greek Psyche.
God breathed life into Adam. This is the breath of life.
I know this. My question should have been more precise. How do you know that we have an immaterial soul? My point is that I believe scripture does not teach you that we have a soul in the sense that most of people think. Most people conceive of the soul and the kind of non-physical thing that inhabits the body. I see no evidence for this view from scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
149
15
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟1,321.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
How do you know that we have an immaterial soul?
You keep trying to drag Plato into a discussion that belongs in Genesis. I’m talking about the Bible, not Greek philosophy. Genesis 2:7 uses the Hebrew word nephesh, and nephesh does not mean a detachable, ghost‑like “soul” the way Plato described it. The text says the man became a living nephesh. It does not say the man “received” a soul. It says the whole living person is the nephesh. If we’re going to talk about what the Bible actually says, we have to start with the Hebrew word in the verse — nephesh — not Plato’s concept.
 
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
149
15
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟1,321.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Are souls a product of the person?
You are doing the same thing, so I will give you the same answer. You keep trying to drag Plato into a discussion that belongs in Genesis. I’m talking about the Bible, not Greek philosophy. Genesis 2:7 uses the Hebrew word nephesh, and nephesh does not mean a detachable, ghost‑like “soul” the way Plato described it. The text says the man became a living nephesh. It does not say the man “received” a soul. It says the whole living person is the nephesh. If we’re going to talk about what the Bible actually says, we have to start with the Hebrew word in the verse — nephesh — not Plato’s concept.
 
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
149
15
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟1,321.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
I don't see individuality as having anything to do with souls.
Same thing,same answer the discussion has NOTHING to do with Plato. 'we are talking about the Hebrew word used in this passage. We need to study HEBREW if we want to study our Bible.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
24,209
17,813
56
USA
✟459,281.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
You are doing the same thing, so I will give you the same answer.
I is? I asked you a few questions about "souls" to clarify what you meant
You keep trying to drag Plato into a discussion that belongs in Genesis.
That seems unlikely. I don't know Plato's philosophy, nor do I care about it.
I’m talking about the Bible, not Greek philosophy. Genesis 2:7 uses the Hebrew word nephesh, and nephesh does not mean a detachable, ghost‑like “soul” the way Plato described it. The text says the man became a living nephesh. It does not say the man “received” a soul. It says the whole living person is the nephesh. If we’re going to talk about what the Bible actually says, we have to start with the Hebrew word in the verse — nephesh — not Plato’s concept.

Since I don't read Hebrew, or remember what this reference to 2:7 might be, none of this has any meaning to me.

I think I may have asked my questions to the wrong post, let's try this one of yours (it likely inspired me to inquire):

The soul comes from God, and science can’t detect God, so of course science can’t detect the soul. Science stays agnostic because the soul isn’t something its tools are designed to measure.

Since you have made some claims about souls and science before we can discuss them I need a better understanding of your soul concept and how science may or may not be able to detect one let me ask these questions again. You can feel free to say "no, that is not what I mean", but references to Jewish theology and Greek philosophy won't help as I don't know them. (I have my own ideas about what a Christian soul concept is, but I doubt you would take my understanding of what the priests tried to teach me as definitive.)

Here are my questions:

Are souls a product of the person?

Do they exist outside bodies?

Do they survive death?

Do they interact with the flesh or are they part of it?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: NxNW
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
149
15
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟1,321.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
I asked you a few questions about "souls" to clarify what you meant
I’m trying to answer your question at the level you’re actually asking it. From the start, I was talking about the Hebrew term that shifts the story from mankind as a whole to the individual Adam. That shift matters, because it’s the same pattern we see in real life: a collective becomes a person. If you want the Sunday‑school cartoon version, that’s one conversation. If you want the real‑world version, that’s another. A good example is in To Kill a Mockingbird, where a hostile crowd breaks down into individuals once one person is addressed directly. I’m using examples like that because they show the exact dynamic you’re asking about.
 
Upvote 0

Firstlightdawn

Active Member
Jan 17, 2026
149
15
73
Cuyahoga Falls
✟1,321.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Since I don't read Hebrew, or remember what this reference to 2:7 might be, none of this has any meaning to me.
This is part of the oral tradition that runs alongside the written Bible. Groups like the Hasidic preserve this very carefully. When you study Hebrew, this is one of the first structural things you learn: the language itself marks the moment when “humanity” becomes “the individual Adam.” That shift isn’t a cartoon version of the story. It’s the real interpretive framework that has been handed down for centuries. I’m bringing this up because it directly answers what you asked. The written text gives the narrative, but the oral tradition explains how the narrative works, how the categories shift, and why the story moves from the collective to the person.

Please do not attack Judah. Every Holocaust survivor I’ve ever listened to warned against using language or attitudes that disrespect the people of Judah. That history is too serious to play with. I’m asking for basic respect, nothing more.
 
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
7,964
5,466
NW
✟289,437.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Everyone already knows we have a soul, so the real question is: what is a soul?
I don't think anyone has a soul. When our brain dies, it's all over.
 
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
7,964
5,466
NW
✟289,437.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The soul comes from God, and science can’t detect God, so of course science can’t detect the soul. Science stays agnostic because the soul isn’t something its tools are designed to measure.
What does the soul do that the brain does not?
 
Upvote 0