stevevw
inquisitive
- Nov 4, 2013
- 17,603
- 2,067
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
We don't need to because the shooter expressed his mind for everyone to see. Even his parents said he was radicalised to the Left.
Of course there is. All political movements end up having a radicalised ideology. Robinson was buying into this online to the point he hated Kirk so much he wanted him shut down for good.
Its the same radicalisation that happens under all civil rights isues like race, sex and gender. Some get radicalised over pushing their beliefs over others to the point of violence and murder.
Of course we have. It was all over the media at the time. Even his parents agreed.
Family and friends of the 22-year-old accused of fatally shooting conservative activist Charlie Kirk described his politics as veering left in recent years as he spent large amounts of time scrolling the “dark corners of the internet,”
Because it does not reflect the reality of what is happening on the ground. A piece of paper with a pie chart on it is not reality. The reality is attacks on churches and Christians in the US has doubled in just two years.
Thats a massive increase and sign of the hatred and violence out there. Add to this the rise in anti semetism and its not a pretty picture.
Well there you go a long outdated source. Today's reality paints a completely different picture.
This only shows a bias based on Leftsm. The organiser has now been charged with breaching the rights of religious worship.
This is typical of the radicalised thinking. That they can justify traumatising worshippers and their children who were visibly upset in the name of what they believe is right according to Christ.
When all along it was a callous act of depriving the right or Christians to worship in peace. The act forbids anyone coming in and disrupting, intimidating or using force to disrupt religious worship. Their act meets this legal definition. So they are guilty of commiting a federal crime.
One of the people taken into custody is a Dem rep and the other a rep from ANIFA who let everyone know what their real aim is. A Marxist revolution. As he declared "you can kill the revolutionary but you can't kill the revolution". This is their real aim. To bring down the current establishment and instill a new order and to their own IMAGE and not Gods.
Thats not to mention that the premise on which they invaded the church was false. That ICE are not allowed to come in and enact federal laws. That because a pastor was associated with ICE that this gives them the right to invade a church.
If anything it is these people who need to be cleansed from the Temple. They are dangerous and radical that they think they can just come into a church and tramatise people. Imagine the Right coming into a BLM meeting or building and doing that.
Radical political attacks on churches is wrong fullstop by either side. Not just wrong, its illegal under the Constitution.
I am interested in the comment "cleansing the Temple". Are you saying that Christians can enter another church and start disrupting and agitating them in the name of cleansing the Temple or Christs church. Because if so you are more or less advocating for what you link is mentioning.
One group believes in their mind they hold the truth and are justified to enter another church and attack their religion and beliefs ?
In fact its almost fringing on radical Islamist who believe they can kill non believers. If you start believing you can attack other churchs based on religious belief. Then sooner or later its going to turn nasty.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
