Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The ICE agent who shot Good may have been in the wrong, I can't say for sure from the video, but please stop with this "Good was just driving home. It's perfectly normal to park your car sideways in a lane of traffic "
I haven't written the words you've ascribed to me in quote marks. The road was not blocked as vehicles passed by in front of Good's vehicle shortly before she was shot. Do you deny that?
That's just invention on your part. You didn't answer my question yet you ask me a question.
They weren't enforcing traffic laws. What makes you think they were?
They had to go around her car. Which means she was blocking the lane of traffic. It was part of her Obstruction and Interferrance she was doing. Which allowed rhe agents to contact her and demand she get out of the car.
You have no idea what she had been involved with that day.
Police do that all the time. They totally do yell at people to get out of the car.
You aren't the one to determine that.
Not for you to decide.
You don't know that.
You have no idea if they were unlawful or not. Your statement is also a bit broad.
No, they were running an operation which was over.
Because they approached a vehicle that's only violation was blocking one lane of a one way street. They had no jurisdiction to approach her vehicle.
She wasn't obstructing anyone. She was over a hundred yards away from the ICE operation.
That hasn't been established by anyone. The Feds refuse to investigate and Minnesota is still investigating the incident.
I am only copying you lol.
So its been confirmed and is not fake news as you claim.
What, you are claiming some anonymous report where anonymous reports are just about always proven wrong. Because they are anonymous and cannot be verified.
Your making stuff up to make a case against Ross and Trump because of bias. Ideological bias.
What do you mean "ready"? They've been using tear gas all along, including when there was an injunction.
You haven't given any evidence of that. All videos show her only blocking one lane and waving any vehicles to pass by. The ICE operation affected traffic far more than Good's vehicle.
Most videos only show the worst police interactions instead of the norm. I have close relatives, close friends, and neighbors that are career police officers. I asked them what the proper way that a trained police officer would have handled themselves in this matter.
I have in videos but I've never seen one do that during a traffic stop. The videos that I've seen of bad stops usually show that that the officer has numerous violations on their record.
No. That usually means that something else had occurred that made police feel that the occupants were dangerous.
That is true but that doesn't mean they were correct. Evidence needs to be presented before a judge, who can make that decision.
That's fine. I won't take their word since they were caught lying.
Spoken like a very biased individual. Facts show two entirely different situations.
I've never denied that.
Because you did.
Maybe but no evidence has been presented that shows her obstructing ICE operations. Video does show her partially blocking the street, about a hundred yards away.
Because unlawful orders have no basis in law and civilians are only required to obey lawful orders.
Hopefully, the Federal government agrees to work with Minnesota officials to properly investigate this tragedy.
Yes we do. She had just dropped her kids off at school.
Do you even know any police officers? I know a bunch. They say that it doesn't.
They are not quotes. Its to seperate what I have summarised rather than the persons direct quote. You talk about me changing what was said. You literally just added words to what was said. No one said anything about Rebecca saying that the officers were going to come back and talk to them later.
Now you are reading stuff into this. I agree its a big "perhaps". But I don't think so. If the women abided and drove off they would not have been in trouble. There would be no reason to come and see them later.
Why, they had done nothing wrong at that stage. It seems the ICE officers were continually checking and noting protesters number plates. To monitor who was protesting.
So your saying this was their first time they had protested against ICE. Its early days so we will not know for sure. But it doesn't matter anyway.
For the same reason you wrote yours.
Thats right. Its early days.
But its not the fun making. But the reference to later encounters ie the plates are the same every moring. Why does it matter to ICE that their plates are the same every morning if they will never see them to check.
But they had not been arrested. You are not injecting unfounded assumptions into whats happening.
You literally just claimed that Rebecca said that the 'later; she used was about the officers coming aroiund to her house later. I am doing exactly the same as you. Summarising what I think they meant. Its not a lie but an honest interpretation of what they meant.
Ah everyone has made statements on the evidence at hand. Why would that mean no one can make further statements on new evidence at hand.
See, you are literally doing what you accused me of doing. I am not using the wifes statement but logic and a reasonable assumption. That people who joing activists groups are usually activists and don't just do it once. They get involved as an ongoing concern. Otherwise they are negating their own activism.
