That is not obvious. Is there any reports of any previous encounters?
Only in news reports. Its early days. But they belonged to a group who were organised to actively disrupt ICE. Do you think this was their only time.
Well, you liked his post.
View attachment 375566
Do you mean 'Like' his post. I can't remember if I said something. I know I agreed with him. But that was not related to my point with Hans. I was speaking about how Hans was claiming certain anonymous facts. Questioning why the report of internal bleeding had not come out officially.
I was saying other facts did not come out straight away either. Like the transcript of what Renee and her partner had said. But not just that. I used a couple of examples. It was not specifically about what Renees partner said. Until it was made about that and then I came in on that.
It seems a communication breakdown. I was coming in on someone elses post not fully realising what the discussion was previously about.
Ah because they belonged to a group whose mission it was to make it hard for ICE lol. Its there in the mission of the group. The groups works in a way that whenever ICE agents are identified in the area then group members are notified to then go out and help protect the community.
That would mean every time ICE are in the area group members come out to protest. More than once. Unless you think that a single protest would be enough. They would need to be going to every single case where ICE agents are in the area.
Because there are clips and reports of ICE changing plates. It is in relation to ICE is changing plates. And that Renee and her wife didn't, in contrast to ICE.
The director of Minnesota’s Driver and Vehicle Services told federal homeland security officials to stop license plate switching immediately. Gov. Tim Walz called tampering with plates “criminal activity.”
www.mprnews.org
The secretary of state sent a cease and desist letter to ICE head Todd Lyons, citing “multiple reports of federal ICE agents illegally swapping out the license plates displayed on vehicles.”
www.nbcnews.com
Hotline introduced to report on agents’ vehicles after one said plates were changed every day in video
www.theguardian.com
Ok so that is new info for me. Which shows I was not following the discussion earlier on this. I should have got up to date with it. Sorry about that.
Nevertheless I don't think this is relevant as to whether Rebecca was revealing that this encounter was not the first time or the last. It doesn't matter if she was referring to ICE agents swapping their number plates.
The important point is Rebecca was inferring that they were going to be out and about that afternoon doing the same. She says 'the plates' will be the same this afternoon when you check them'. Inferring they will meet again that afternoon.
That is not what she is saying, she says the plate will be the same when ICE comes and talk to them later. So "She is telling everyone that they are going to do the same that day." is straight up false. Why are you straight up twisting the what she said?
So what did Rebecca mean when she said 'later' ? Was that later regarding the same incident they were in at the time. Or later as in a seperate encounter later that day they may have. To remind them that each time they see them their plates will always be the same.
What did Rebecca mean when she said "we don't change our plates every morning" ? Why say every morning ?
Anyway all this is irrelevant. They belonged to an organised group whose aim was to be present to stop every ICE agent in their area. Considering that has happened many times. Do you honestly believe this was their only time they went out to protest.
This is your interpretation based on something she NOT did say.
Ok fair enough. Yes its an interpretation like all views are at the moment. There are bits and pieces of info and its hard to piece things together.
All I will say is based on probabilities someone who joins a specific activist group to stop ICE will be actively involved in protesting against ICE when they come into their area.
Quotation marks around a falsehood? Are you joking? That's not what she said again. What video are you watching?
It seems an interpretation others are coming to as well. I agree trying to work out what is going on by certain statements is not enough. There needs to be more evidence. More information. I am sure they would have info on whether there were other occassions.
No, when ICE comes and talk to them later them. Not "stop". There is no implication that they will keep doing it the same day.
But then theres no indication they won't or have not. Its too hard to tell.
So you think this was their first time ?
Based on saying that their plates will always be the same whenever they see them. Why say it otherwise.
Where? Not, in the video I linked. When ICE comes to talk to them later, implies when ICE seek them out, not the other way around.
What do you mean seek them out. At their homes or when they are protesting again.
Give me the video you working from then, because your commentary doesn't match the video I posted. Don't twist her words.
I have but evidently there is more than one interpretation. I was agreeing with the other poster on his interpretation. So its not as if this interpretation is a reasonable interpretation. Two independent people coming to the same interpretation.
But I reserve my judgement. I don't want to base the truth on a short quote. More evidence is needed.
But in the meantime I keep coming back to why its not a reasonable conclusion that activists belonging to a group that aims to stop ICE would not go out more than once. If ICE is often in their area. I think the idea is to keep protesting over and over again and not just once.