Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
All I am saying is that the odds of getting shot by a police officer are never zero, but it is considerably higher than zero if you go out of your way to mess with them.
Ok so police carrying out street judgments that could include execution? So that’s not normal, nor is it a sign of a healthy and effective policing of the general populace. A police force of Tackleberrys is not the goal.
Nothing about my statement was inaccurate and nothing you stated changed that fact. But if you want to increase your chances of becoming a martyr for your cause, who am I to stop you.
Delusion…? Fabrication…? An effort to cover his behind…? If I were to believe the officer (I don’t) or the government (I don’t), I know “internal bleeding” is a vague and meaningless descriptor. As an EMT, if I gave a patient report as “internal bleeding,” I’d be told that’s not a valid report and to be more specific. Since that’s what they told us as bottom feeder EMTs, I find it impossible to believe that is an actual doctor’s diagnosis after treatment. And the fact that he was treated and released tells me that any “internal bleeding” he had was superficial.
I actually pointed out all the inaccurate things. You disagree, but disagreement doesn’t mean I’m wrong.
You write this as if they are arresting people *because* the are murders and rapists. The data does not support this. Who are these "violent criminals" being arrested by ICE? People who have served their time or those awaiting trial. They aren't hunting down fugitives from justice or solving unsolved crimes. They are arresting people without valid immigration papers and some of them happen to be ex-cons and persons with pending charges. In one case justice has been served as to their crimes in the other they are *interrupting* the application of justice by deporting people (or preparing to) without being convicted for the crimes they have committed.
It's not just the "left", not even close, particularly in the twin cities. The opposition is widespread in political ideologies. Basically everyone except the "deport them all" crowd is participating at some level.
Blowing whistles, following ICE, honking horns, and videoing their operations are all protected First Amendment activities.
It is only a crime if they physically impede passage.
I've heard a couple reports of these, but that is all.
Now your talking about one incident that didn't even involve ICE. The people who broke in likely committed some misdemeanors (trespass or whatever), but that can be discussed on the active thread on that incident.
I do.
I don't care. You've had enough fun playing with the others on this line. I'm not interested.
You do know that inernal bleeding is simply a bruise? I've got 'internal bleeding' on my thigh because I bumped into the dining table yesterday. Luckily I wasn't armed. I might have started shooting people in the face.
Anytime there is a gun, the odds of getting shot is never zero, and if you go around looking for trouble with law enforcement, the odds of getting shot get much higher. That is a fact. Stupid games earn stupid prizes, and I highly discourage you from playing stupid games with ICE agents unless you want to increase your odds of getting shot.
As I previously stated, I do not think she was intentionally trying to run anyone over. Just that she was in such a state of panic that she did not care if anyone was ran over.
Which is indicative of a broken policing system. Shooting people for “causing trouble” is not a valid reason for an officer-led shooting. The only valid reason of an officer-led shooting is self-defense or defense of an onlooker from an active and imminent loss of life.
Just blindly accepting that as a fact is sad. Blindly accepting that as fact and thinking that’s fine is even sadder.
www.ms.now
I never said it was fine. It is just a fact. What i think is sad is how despite your thought about the policing system being broken, you still think it is a good idea to obstruct law enforcement.
Nothing I described is obstructing law enforcement. I’m not standing in their way. I’m not physically intimidating them. I’m not attacking them. I’m blowing a whistle, pulling an alarm on my person, and videoing them. None of that stops them from performing their duties, as we’ve seen. Might as well say a fire alarm that notifies everybody in the house of the presence of fire makes it too hard for fire fighters to put out fires so we should just warn people who have them they may get shot.
www.youtube.com
It is not. Obstruction is when you use illegal means to impair their ability to do their job. Relying on legal means to prioritize my rights that happens to make more work for them is not and, I might add, is the whole point of having rights in a free society.
MN Police Chiefs news conference today.....chief of Brooklyn Park (Minneaoplis suburb) notes both citizens and off-duty police officers of color have been stopped based on racial profiling.
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
www.youtube.com
Yes, it is. You are openly admitting that your intention is to delay a federal law enforcement. Which is obstruction in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1510. Now, you know I am black. I respectfully ask that you stop trying to be my female white knight trying to come to my rescue.
