• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Rights Of Convicted Non-citizens Whose Sentence Has Finished

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
21,000
5,140
✟1,068,142.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Based on the answer to the question below, I believe that we can have a bifurcated discussion on how Trump should proceed, given his policies toward undocumented immigrants and deportation. Personally, I think that the most straightforward way to limit Trump's ICE policy is for the federal government to have access to those jailed non-citizens convicted of certain crimes.

RIGHTS OF NON-CITIZEN CONVICTS WHOSE TERM HAS FINISHED

Should the federal government be given lists of non-citizens who are completing their prison terms and be allowed to interview them before release to assess whether individuals are qualified to remain in the US or perhaps should be subject to judicial review of their status? Who should make this decision?
====================
This is a matter a matter of balancing the rights of non-citizen criminals against the stated needs of the federal government.
===================
The actions of Trump on immigration and with regard to sending ICE and troops to Democratic cities may be related, but, for me, that should be a separate discussion.
===================
I think that there are very clear ramifications of the answer to this underlying question. For example, if states refuse, and if there are even a relatively small number of those who by law should be deported who are now being released into the community, then the federal government might decide that there is a reason to camp out around every prison and detain those who might be deportable.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,867
9,923
65
Martinez
✟1,230,654.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Should the federal government be given lists of non-citizens who are completing their prison terms and be allowed to interview them before release to assess whether individuals are qualified to remain in the US or perhaps should be subject to judicial review of their status? Who should make this decision?
The question above has no relevance to the HLS mandate and subsequently ICE. The administration has significantly expanded expedited removal, which allows immigration officers to deport certain individuals without a court hearing. Under the Laken Riley Act passed in 2025, the government also mandates the detention of non-citizens charged with or convicted of theft-related crimes.
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
21,000
5,140
✟1,068,142.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The question above has no relevance to the HLS mandate and subsequently ICE. The administration has significantly expanded expedited removal, which allows immigration officers to deport certain individuals without a court hearing. Under the Laken Riley Act passed in 2025, the government also mandates the detention of non-citizens charged with or convicted of theft-related crimes.
PART of the mandate is to remove those undocumented who have committed felonies or other violent crimes.
==========
Do you support the federal government having access to prison records so that they can interview non-citizens before they are released.
==========
Having this access would NOT stop all of Trump's excesses regarding immigration. That would take elections.

What it would do is address a serious issue where the majority of Americans probably agree.
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,867
9,923
65
Martinez
✟1,230,654.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
PART of the mandate is to remove those undocumented who have committed felonies or other violent crimes.
==========
Do you support the federal government having access to prison records so that they can interview non-citizens before they are released.
==========
Having this access would NOT stop all of Trump's excesses regarding immigration. That would take elections.

What it would do is address a serious issue where the majority of Americans probably agree.
The Trump administration is lawless. They don't care about due process. This is my point. Your post is rather moot because there is already a policy in place.
When someone is booked into jail or prison, their fingerprints are automatically shared with federal databases. If ICE identifies a person they believe is removable, they send a detainer request to the facility. This asks the prison to notify ICE of the person's release date or to hold them for up to 48 hours so agents can take them into custody directly inside the facility.
In "sanctuary" jurisdictions that do not honor these requests, ICE agents may wait in public areas outside a facility to make an arrest upon release.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: mark46
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
16,390
9,977
53
✟425,958.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
RIGHTS OF NON-CITIZEN CONVICTS WHOSE TERM HAS FINISHED
I like the bit where the Administration can revoke citizenship. That way you can degrade the rights of any American at any time.

Luckily it will always be the bad kind of American that will suffer and no face eating leopards will apply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: askesis
Upvote 0