I'm just now able to memorize Pittufik. I just have to think: "Pitiful." Maybe that's what it means in Inuit.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
When did Russia invade US, Canada, or Greenland?Well, I'd rather be proactive than reactive like most of NATO. Does Russia have to invade again to wake everyone up?
Could you please use the usual code for satire: [/satire].You know, I think if Trump does shoot 12000 people, that would be a good deterrent.
I think he used 'Donroe' sarcastically (but I was too afraid to check).Proof that you bought into the Trump rhetoric and excuses - hook, line, and sinker.
On this forum, it's the Poe's Law tags: [/Poe]Could you please use the usual code for satire: [/satire].
People might think you were being serious.
But I don't think the use of the word as it was typed was a Poe. Or sarcasm. I was kinda being sarcastic myself in suggesting it wasn't.On this forum, it's the Poe's Law tags: [/Poe]
Look up Poe's Law in Wikipedia.
Considering that Russia's Black Sea fleet is hiding in port, due to Ukraine - a country that doesn't even have a navy. And, given that their one aircraft carrier is a smoking piece of crap that has to be followed around by a tug boat, for when it breaks down. Again. It's unlikely they'll be able to mount and support an amphibious assault against Greenland, the US or Canada in the foreseeable future.Well, I'd rather be proactive than reactive like most of NATO. Does Russia have to invade again to wake everyone up?
No. But if they would do that, it would be an invasion.Wait, is that the definition of invasion?
They tried to do that, they just failed. Let's not kid ourselves into thinking the USA would fail in accomplishing this goal if it put its mind to it.So that means the Russians have not yet invaded Ukraine.
Considering that Russia's Black Sea fleet is hiding in port, due to Ukraine - a country that doesn't even have a navy. And, given that their one aircraft carrier is a smoking piece of crap that has to be followed around by a tug boat, for when it breaks down. Again. It's unlikely they'll be able to mount and support an amphibious assault against Greenland, the US or Canada in the foreseeable future.
No satire here, I was saying that if Trump did what the Ayatollah is doing, it would be a good deterrent.Could you please use the usual code for satire: [/satire].
People might think you were being serious.
I knew Ukraine would be trouble for us during the foreseeable future, since G Bush, and were we prepared? It's going to take time and money to build, that's why I think Europe is doing good to take Greenland away from Trump. I am watching the Chinese rapid build, and all this won't happen till China gets stronger, and it's happening fast. How long will it take Europe to build a navy that is capable like the USA fleets? Does the EU have money to give to Ukraine and make ships? It's even harder now because of the global economic slowdown.Again. It's unlikely they'll be able to mount and support an amphibious assault against Greenland, the US or Canada in the foreseeable future.
Not talking about the Black Sea, and yes, Russian and a host of other ships are getting blown up.Considering that Russia's Black Sea fleet is hiding in port, due to Ukraine - a country that doesn't even have a navy. And, given that their one aircraft carrier is a smoking piece of crap that has to be followed around by a tug boat, for when it breaks down.
Considering that Russia's Black Sea fleet is hiding in port, due to Ukraine - a country that doesn't even have a navy. And, given that their one aircraft carrier is a smoking piece of crap that has to be followed around by a tug boat, for when it breaks down. Again. It's unlikely they'll be able to mount and support an amphibious assault against Greenland, the US or Canada in the foreseeable future.
Why bring up amphibious again? Last PostI wouldn't do an amphibious assault because Greenland would be hard to hold, but I would knock anti-sub/ ship infrastructure.
You said: "It would depend what those troops are doing. If they march into the capital and install a new government, that would constitute an invasion. "No. But if they would do that, it would be an invasion.
Do I have to do all this logic math equation stuff at you where I say that just because a is b doesn't mean that b does not also include other elements?
They tried to do that, they just failed. Let's not kid ourselves into thinking the USA would fail in accomplishing this goal if it put its mind to it.
on a fun note, countries are building military forces in Greenland, and before anyone says again, "This is all part of trumps plans." if that was true he would have stopped the were coming for greenland nonsense, instead he keeps amping it up. In other news while trumps alienated the rest of the world and Canada, Canada has been meeting with China and it's leaders to do trade deals. Everything trump has done to supposedly make the world safter, just made the US weaker and a laughing stock.
jokes on you, trump can't remember the code, and no one trusts him to remind him of it.The jokes on them, we have the nuclear Trump card!
jokes on you, trump can't remember the code, and no one trusts him to remind him of it.
....how dumb of you to think he can count to 5.Ha, ha, ha!
The code is...
1...2...3...4...5.
The same as his luggage.
As would burning people at the stake for DUI. But who in their right mind would suggest that?No satire here, I was saying that if Trump did what the Ayatollah is doing, it would be a good deterrent.
I have read ( can't verify) that some Republicans in congress have said that if he actually goes through with invading Greenland they will vote to impeach him. Also there is a bill being drawn up in Congress to prevent any invasion of a NATO ally by the US. Sad that's where we are. But I can't believe he would actually want to go through with this, I would think he would see that it would cost Republicans the midterms(IMO) if he goes through with invading Greenland and the Repubs in Congress remain silent and the military acquiesces.In this instance, I do not believe the military will acquiesce.