• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

The latest “word salad” term concerning Christian baptism: Identification.

Ain't Zwinglian

Well-Known Member
Feb 23, 2020
1,319
853
Oregon
✟193,681.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Have you noticed over the last 20 or so years, a new term used by credobaptists to define what baptism is identification.
Some quotations I have gathered from the internet:
  • Your baptism is a sacred symbol of faith that identifies you with the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. Baptism also identifies you with other Christ followers.
  • Baptism illustrates a “believer’s identification with Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection.
  • Baptism by immersion, while it is the most biblical mode of identifying with Christ
  • The Apostle Paul explains that going into the water enables us to identify with the burial of Christ, and coming out of the water enables us to identify with the resurrection of Christ.
CRITIQUE
  • Identification, to identify, or identifying are not Biblical terms (not found in Scripture).
  • Identification, to identify, or identifying as used by are undefined terms, just words which adds confusion and do not add clarity into an already contentious debate.
  • It is impossible for any Christian to identify with Christ. Christians only have one nature, Jesus has two. How Jesus’ all atoning death be something a Christian can identify with is beyond logic. Jesus being the God-Man had to be man to be our substitute as man. Jesus being the God-Man, HAD TO BE GOD IN ORDER TAKE ALL THE SINS OF HUMANITY AND DESTROY THEM ON THE CROSS. This is something any Christian cannot identify with. Period.
  • In the Incarnation, Jesus identifies with believers deeper and more profound than we might believe as revealed in the mystical union passages of Scripture such as
    • II Peter 1:4 For by these He has granted to us His precious and magnificent promises, so that by them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world by lust.
    • John 15:4 Abide in Me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself unless it abides in the vine, so neither can you unless you abide in Me.
    • Gal. 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me;
    • II Cor 5:17 17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!
    • John 14:20 On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you.
    • Col. 1:27 To them God has chosen to make known among the Gentiles the glorious riches of this mystery, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory.
These passages of Scripture describe a formal union between God and the individual believer by justification by faith. Also can be seen as a union between Christ in the incarnation and the entire human race which makes objective justification possible. Additionally this union is the indwelling of the Triune God which effects sanctification.

Whatever the term “identification” means, it must be Christocentric and not man centered.
 

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,893
9,914
65
Martinez
✟1,232,289.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Have you noticed over the last 20 or so years, a new term used by credobaptists to define what baptism is identification.
Some quotations I have gathered from the internet:
  • Your baptism is a sacred symbol of faith that identifies you with the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. Baptism also identifies you with other Christ followers.
  • Baptism illustrates a “believer’s identification with Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection.
  • Baptism by immersion, while it is the most biblical mode of identifying with Christ
  • The Apostle Paul explains that going into the water enables us to identify with the burial of Christ, and coming out of the water enables us to identify with the resurrection of Christ.
CRITIQUE
  • Identification, to identify, or identifying are not Biblical terms (not found in Scripture).
  • Identification, to identify, or identifying as used by are undefined terms, just words which adds confusion and do not add clarity into an already contentious debate.
  • It is impossible for any Christian to identify with Christ. Christians only have one nature, Jesus has two. How Jesus’ all atoning death be something a Christian can identify with is beyond logic. Jesus being the God-Man had to be man to be our substitute as man. Jesus being the God-Man, HAD TO BE GOD IN ORDER TAKE ALL THE SINS OF HUMANITY AND DESTROY THEM ON THE CROSS. This is something any Christian cannot identify with. Period.
  • In the Incarnation, Jesus identifies with believers deeper and more profound than we might believe as revealed in the mystical union passages of Scripture such as
    • II Peter 1:4 For by these He has granted to us His precious and magnificent promises, so that by them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world by lust.
    • John 15:4 Abide in Me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself unless it abides in the vine, so neither can you unless you abide in Me.
    • Gal. 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me;
    • II Cor 5:17 17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!
    • John 14:20 On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you.
    • Col. 1:27 To them God has chosen to make known among the Gentiles the glorious riches of this mystery, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory.
These passages of Scripture describe a formal union between God and the individual believer by justification by faith. Also can be seen as a union between Christ in the incarnation and the entire human race which makes objective justification possible. Additionally this union is the indwelling of the Triune God which effects sanctification.

Whatever the term “identification” means, it must be Christocentric and not man centered.
It is a modern way to describe the the Christian condition of being " in Christ ".
Blessings
 
  • Like
Reactions: David Lamb
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,894
9,054
51
The Wild West
✟885,949.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
Have you noticed over the last 20 or so years, a new term used by credobaptists to define what baptism is identification.
Some quotations I have gathered from the internet:
  • Your baptism is a sacred symbol of faith that identifies you with the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. Baptism also identifies you with other Christ followers.
  • Baptism illustrates a “believer’s identification with Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection.
  • Baptism by immersion, while it is the most biblical mode of identifying with Christ
  • The Apostle Paul explains that going into the water enables us to identify with the burial of Christ, and coming out of the water enables us to identify with the resurrection of Christ.
CRITIQUE
  • Identification, to identify, or identifying are not Biblical terms (not found in Scripture).
  • Identification, to identify, or identifying as used by are undefined terms, just words which adds confusion and do not add clarity into an already contentious debate.
  • It is impossible for any Christian to identify with Christ. Christians only have one nature, Jesus has two. How Jesus’ all atoning death be something a Christian can identify with is beyond logic. Jesus being the God-Man had to be man to be our substitute as man. Jesus being the God-Man, HAD TO BE GOD IN ORDER TAKE ALL THE SINS OF HUMANITY AND DESTROY THEM ON THE CROSS. This is something any Christian cannot identify with. Period.
  • In the Incarnation, Jesus identifies with believers deeper and more profound than we might believe as revealed in the mystical union passages of Scripture such as
    • II Peter 1:4 For by these He has granted to us His precious and magnificent promises, so that by them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world by lust.
    • John 15:4 Abide in Me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself unless it abides in the vine, so neither can you unless you abide in Me.
    • Gal. 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me;
    • II Cor 5:17 17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!
    • John 14:20 On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you.
    • Col. 1:27 To them God has chosen to make known among the Gentiles the glorious riches of this mystery, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory.
These passages of Scripture describe a formal union between God and the individual believer by justification by faith. Also can be seen as a union between Christ in the incarnation and the entire human race which makes objective justification possible. Additionally this union is the indwelling of the Triune God which effects sanctification.

Whatever the term “identification” means, it must be Christocentric and not man centered.

Very elegant.

Yesterday was the feast of St. Basil the Great and of the Circumcision of Christ in the Orthodox churches on the Julian calendar, including all Orthodox Christians in Jerusalem, and the canonical Ukrainian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Belarussian, Serbian, Coptic, Ethiopian, Japanese, Georgian and Aleutian / Native Alaskan Orthodox, as well as many of the Polish, the Orthodox Church in America, and some Bulgarian Orthodox, and some of the Carpatho-Rusyns, and also most Russian Orthodox aside from a few dual-calendar parishes in the OCA.

From Byzantine Rite (Eastern Orthodox) Matins were elegant stichera praising St. Basil, as well as the Katavasia of the upcoming Feast of the Baptism of our Lord, Theophany, also known as Epiphany in the West, until the fourth century also the feast of the Nativity, until this was moved to nine months following the Annunciation on March 25th, except in the Armenian church - Hagiopolitan Armenians in the Patriarchate of Jerusalem and the Holy Land, particularly at the Greco-Armenian-Latin Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, will celebrate the Nativity on Monday the 19th together with the Baptism of our Lord.

Meanwhile from the liturgy today, I thought you might find these quotes interesting, which are presented for historical context only, and not as polemics:

Vespers begins with these hymns, known as Stichera, because of the way they are connected to each other and to Scripture, which reference the impending feast of the Baptism of our Lord and also St. Basil enduring persecution after confessing the true Christian faith to the Arian governor of Cappadocia, who like all Arians, denied the Incarnation and the Deity of Christ our God, note also the rich baptismal references:

Having caused Christ, the Well-spring of life, to dwell in thy soul by thy pure life, O divinely revealed Basil, thou didst pour forth rivers of the teachings of piety upon the whole world; and thereby watered the faithful people of the Church. The fruits of the confession of thy lips, offer grace unto Him Who hath glorified thy memory unto the ages of ages. (Twice)

O divinely revealed Basil, the myrrh of the grace which was poured forth upon thee anointed thee to be a priest of the Gospel of the kingdom of heaven, and with the sweet savor of Christ thou hast filled the world with the fragrance of the knowledge of Him. Wherefore, graciously accepting the pleas of thy servants, ask thou great mercy on behalf of us who honor thee.

The composition of Byzantius: Arrayed in the vesture of a hierarch, O Basil, thou champion of the Trinity, thou didst stand before the governor’s tribunal, accepting tribulation for the Faith; and like unto one with the prowess of an athlete, thou didst put to shame the wrath of the governor, who mightily raged with ungodliness, threatening thee with merciless dismemberment; but by zealously reasoning, and becoming a martyr by intent, thou didst receive a crown of victory from Christ, Who hath great mercy.

The baptismal references become the focus of the Canon of Matins:

Ode IV from the Canon of the Circumcision:

Canon of the Feast

Irmos: I have heard report of Thy dispensation, O Lord, and have glorified Thee Who alone lovest mankind.

Circumcision hath ceased since Christ was circumcised of His own will, saving a multitude of the nations by grace. // The eighth day, whereon the Master was circumcised in the flesh, is an image of the everlasting life of the age to come.

Ode IV from the Canon of the Hierarch St. Basil

Irmos
: I have heard report of Thy dispensation, O Lord, and have glorified Thee Who alone lovest mankind.

As the Church of Christ is adorned like a bride by His nativity, so is it also adorned by thy memorial, O most blessed one. * Doing battle for God, thou wast shown to be invincible, O Basil, making all subject to His precepts. * Thou hast been given to the Church by God as a firm rampart and bulwark, O most blessed Basil. * O father Basil, thou hast been shown to be a scythe cutting down the adversary, and a fire consuming falsehood.

Theotokion: We beseech thee, O pure one who didst conceive God without seed: Pray thou ever for thy servants.

Katavasia from Ode V:

Katavasia I:
Jesus, the Prince of Life, hath come to set loose from condemnation Adam the first-formed man; * and though as God He needeth no cleansing, * yet for the sake of fallen man He is cleansed in the Jordan. * In its streams He slew the enmity * and bestoweth the peace that passeth all understanding.

Katavasia II: Washed clean of the poison of the dark and defiled enemy * by the cleansing of the Spirit, * we have set out upon a new path * which leadeth to unapproachable joy, * to which only they whom God hath reconciled with himself * can draw near.

Sticheron in praise of St. Basil the Great:
“Having become a child of God through grace, by the regeneration of divine baptism, O venerable one, in essence and truth thou didst confess the preëternal Son and Word of God, as consubstantial and equally without beginning with the Father; and with the brilliance of thy words thou didst shut the gaping mouths of the heretics. Wherefore, thou hast made thine abode in the kingdom on high, reigning together with Christ, Who ruleth alone and naturally, and doth richly grant great mercy unto the world.”

+

Obviously these ancient Orthodox hymns strongly emphasize the doctrine of baptismal regeneration. Of course not all who advocate infant baptism believe in baptismal regeneration; notably John Wesley believed in infant baptism but not baptismal regeneration, an odd exception to his usually fairly crisp Patristic orthodoxy (or, perhaps he viewed the matter as adiaphora; he might well have believed in regeneration, but he sought to remove references to it from the version of the Book of Common Prayer he edited for use by the Methodists of North America, the Sunday Service Book; that would actually be more typically Wesleyan.

One thing I like about Martin Luther is that, like the Early Church Fathers, Luther was less willing to agree to disagree, to put it mildly. On the other hand, Wesley fortunately managed to get dogmatics right most of the time, due to having chanced upon heavily Eastern theological material, even going so far as to attempt to revive among Anglicans and Methodists the practice of fasting on Wednesdays, which had died off in the Western church (now, fasting on Fridays has all but died off except in Lent, and even in Lent its basically seen as an excuse to consume seafood more than an actual abstinence; to be fair, some Orthodox regard Lent as an opportunity to indulge in lobsters and caviar, which in some churches are permitted because the ancient fasting regulations were written before these became delicacies. Meanwhile, still others like myself suffer from health problems and have to fast in manners other than our diet, for we involuntarily fast much of the time.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,100
12,155
Georgia
✟1,171,162.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Rom 6:
What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin so that grace may increase? 2 May it never be! How shall we who died to sin still live in it? 3 Or do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus have been baptized into His death? 4 Therefore we have been buried with Him through baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life. 5 For if we have become united with Him in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall also be in the likeness of His resurrection, 6 knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, in order that our body of sin might be done away with, so that we would no longer be slaves to sin; 7 for he who has died is freed from sin.

8 Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him, 9 knowing that Christ, having been raised from the dead, is never to die again; death no longer is master over Him. 10 For the death that He died, He died to sin once for all; but the life that He lives, He lives to God. 11 Even so consider yourselves to be dead to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus.

12 Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its lusts, 13 and do not go on presenting the members of your body to sin as instruments of unrighteousness; but present yourselves to God as those alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God. 14 For sin shall not be master over you, for you are not under law but under grace.

Clearly
1. Infants don't view their baptism that way
2. Infants were not making such choices at baptism
3. The description has to do with someone knowing they are being buried with Christ at baptism

2 Cor 5 "if anyone is in Christ Jesus , he is a NEW CREATION", a new nature, the new birth

Acts 2 'believe on the Lord Jesus Chris and be baptized for the remission of sins" --- as we all agree.

The reason for infant baptism is not that the Bible teaches it, it is this concept that bad things would happen to an infant that dies without being baptized.

No infant has ever done that

===

you said "These passages of Scripture describe a formal union between God and the individual believer by justification by faith."

No infant has ever accepted justification or expressed faith in justification, or faith in Christ, or accepted the gospel . I think we all agree on that part.

1 John 2:2 says Christ is the atoning sacrifice for our sins and not for our sins only but for the sins of the whole world, that includes infants.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
16,894
9,054
51
The Wild West
✟885,949.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
1. Infants don't view their baptism that way
2. Infants were not making such choices at baptism
3. The description has to do with someone knowing they are being buried with Christ at baptism

So what?

If we accept your interpretation as correct (which I do not, neither did Martin Luther, who coined the phrase the “Sola Scriptura” and promoted the concept some denominations aggressively , but for a moment, let us assume your reading of those passages is the sole accepted one endorsed by all Church Fathers and denominations. Where does that take us vis a vis baptism?

Precisely where the liturgical churches are now. You see, none of what you’ve said has the effect of reducing the unlimited scope of Matthew 28:19, or the Longer Ending of Mark or other examples of the Great Commission, which do not feature exemptions spelled out for children, the mentally disabled, et cetera. Nor does the mention of the baptism of entire households in Acts include any qualifying statements that would exclude any class of individual from receiving Christ our God through Baptism.

And this is why the early church always baptized infants, a practice we know was de rigeur in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th centuries and which is implied to such an extent in the 1st century that only a minority of denominations, primarily those associated with either the Radical Reformation movement started by the Anabaptists in Germany, which Luther was correctly appalled by, or the Restorationist movement in the 19th century, which then fused with some extreme elements of the Wesleyan holiness movement to give us the Pentecostal and Charismatic churches, which also mostly reject infant baptism.

On the other hand, all of the traditional liturgical churches, along with the Presbyterians, most Congregationalists, most Methodists and indeed most Christians who identify with a denomination, indeed the vast majority of Christians overall (since not only do all of the three largest Protestant denominational groupings - the Anglicans, Lutherans, and Calvinists) engage in infant baptism, but this is also the practice of the Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox, and the Assyrian Church of the East.

Now, most Baptists are content to recognize our faith, and I have very good relations with many baptists on this site. Most do not object to my claim to have been born again as an infant, even if they strongly prefer credobaptism. Likewise i do not disown my family’s own legacy, for one of my ancestors was among the first Baptists in North America, and a leader of that community.

Rather my objection is to the insistence that the Bible says something which it doesn’t. This assertion, coupled with an ahistorical narrative about the history of the early church and the progression of churches therein, which we see in separate forms from Landmark Baptists on the one hand and some Adventists who adhere to a literal reading of The Great Controversy on the other, result in an isolation between members of these churches and their brethren elsewhere, a needless alienation from the fruits of ecumenical reconciliation, which is driven by constant criticism of the traditional churches.

As I have often said, none of us would deeply object to credobaptism or Adventism were it not for the incessant polemics directed at us, and also I would add, the constant attempts to imply such polemics represent the mainstream of Protestant thought (they do not, and never have, for Adventists and Landmark Baptists collectively represent only a small percentage of the overall credobaptist population, being greatly outnumbered by other Baptists such as members of the SBC and numerous other credobaptist denominations, the majority of which engage in various forms of ecumenical fellowship with other Christians, even the Roman Catholics, and some of whom, such as the Rev. Billy Graham, memory eternal, have had particularly close relations with the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox Church.

The other frustrating argument is of course that which seeks to present a denominationally-favored interpretation of scripture as the only logical or sensible interpretation of that verse, when in many cases not only is this not the case, but the interpretations in question are actually rather obscure and unusual (for example, the belief that John ch. 6 is not talking about Holy Communion, common among 19th century Sabbatarian Restorationists, but extremely rare outside of that context; there are of course many other examples of this). Where it becomes tiresome is when those who disagree with an interpretation are accused of disagreeing with Scripture, which historically happened far too often when discussing issues such as credobaptism.
 
Upvote 0