• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Moving Toward To A New US Foreign Policy Focus

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,933
5,132
✟1,056,970.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The US has been trying to move away from a Europe and Middle East focused foreign policy since the beginning of the century. This isn't new for Trump. And yes, there are those who strongly believe that US should wring out every last benefit from the post World War II economy that they created and that benefitted us so much.
==================
After 25 years more, it is truly time for the US to move on. We should have done so in 2003, a couple of months into the Iraq War BEFORE we headed to Baghdad wanting to change the government of yet another country and try to make them accept US style democracy. This is a failed policy. The US should be the shining light on the hill, but not the country forcing others to accept our system.

Trump wants out of being the one that runs the world. He wants the US in a greatly reduced role at the UN, NATO, and as a provider of foreign aid. He does eant to be a very rich man.
==========
TRUMP CAMPAIGNED ON NO MORE FOREVER WARS
1) He has so far failed to end the war in Ukraine.
2) He has succeeded in the Abraham Accords and in securing a cease fire, and in greatly reducing Middle East terrorism.
3) Through many threats, trump has helped to stop or shorten many conflicts.
4) He is doing what he can regarding China, no better or worse than most
5) and now, Trump is turning to focus on the Americas.
6) and of course making lots and lots of deals that benefit the US, his family and his friends
====================
WILL THE NEXT COUPLE OF PRESIDENTS MOVE BACK TO THE OLD SYSTEMS?
I suspect not. Europe is much more self-reliant as is the Middle East. We need to move on. After all, it's been over 100 years.

We will probably clean up a bit, reducing Russia's influence in the Americas even more. We will develop an immigration policy that makes sense. And, yes, we will develop CLOSER ties with Canada and Mexico.

Other than that, the focus for the next decade or so will be internal, dealing with our many crises and especially the job situation created by AI and greater automation.
 

MarcusGregor

New year, new you...
Oct 1, 2025
127
237
26
South
✟16,275.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The damage this administration has done and is continuing to do to our foreign relations will take decades to repair. That's assuming we actually make it through this as a country intact.
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,751
9,797
65
Martinez
✟1,215,465.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Trump wants out of being the one that runs the world. He wants the US in a greatly reduced role at the UN, NATO, and as a provider of foreign aid. He does want to be a very rich man.
I am wondering if you keep up with this administration’s agenda? One thing I agree with , he does want to be very rich. The sentiment " This is our hemisphere " and that he will personally be in control of oil revenues from Venezuela for sure tells us that. But you are missing the bigger picture here. Follow the money. Follow the power. His " parallel system " in our government has just taken hold.
Thanks for sharing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard T
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
30,487
30,308
Baltimore
✟877,752.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The US has been trying to move away from a Europe and Middle East focused foreign policy since the beginning of the century. This isn't new for Trump. And yes, there are those who strongly believe that US should wring out every last benefit from the post World War II economy that they created and that benefitted us so much.
==================
After 25 years more, it is truly time for the US to move on. We should have done so in 2003, a couple of months into the Iraq War BEFORE we headed to Baghdad wanting to change the government of yet another country and try to make them accept US style democracy. This is a failed policy. The US should be the shining light on the hill, but not the country forcing others to accept our system.

Trump wants out of being the one that runs the world. He wants the US in a greatly reduced role at the UN, NATO, and as a provider of foreign aid. He does eant to be a very rich man.
==========
TRUMP CAMPAIGNED ON NO MORE FOREVER WARS
1) He has so far failed to end the war in Ukraine.
2) He has succeeded in the Abraham Accords and in securing a cease fire, and in greatly reducing Middle East terrorism.
3) Through many threats, trump has helped to stop or shorten many conflicts.
4) He is doing what he can regarding China, no better or worse than most

Have you not been paying attention for the last six months?

Not only has he failed to end the war in Ukraine, he's starting a new one in Venezuela and threatening others.

The Abraham Accords were signed during his first term. His diplomatic successes have all been low-hanging fruit: low-grade tensions among small players who can be easily pushed around or bought off. Those are good things, but they're often oversold by his fans.

Trump may be "doing what he can regarding China," but that's only because his limited faculties prevent him from concieving of anything less hamfisted than tariffs and flattery. Obama had the TPP and Biden had the CHIPS act. Trump pulled out of the TPP (which was putting pressure on China) and slammed the CHIPS act in public, though I'm unclear on what substantive changes he's actually made to it.


5) and now, Trump is turning to focus on the Americas.

Sure, if you're including Central and South America.
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,933
5,132
✟1,056,970.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Why is Trump promising "very strong action" against Iran if he is only going to be focusing on the Americas?
The mullahs and their security forces in Iran remains an existential threat to our Sunni allies and to Israel.
==========
But let's be clear, Trump is NOT isolationist. He has militarily and diplomatically interfered all throughout the world, most recently in Nigeria, the most important country in Africa is so many ways.
 
Upvote 0

FAITH-IN-HIM

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2024
2,792
2,010
WI
✟78,963.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The US has been trying to move away from a Europe and Middle East focused foreign policy since the beginning of the century. This isn't new for Trump. And yes, there are those who strongly believe that US should wring out every last benefit from the post World War II economy that they created and that benefitted us so much.
==================
After 25 years more, it is truly time for the US to move on. We should have done so in 2003, a couple of months into the Iraq War BEFORE we headed to Baghdad wanting to change the government of yet another country and try to make them accept US style democracy. This is a failed policy. The US should be the shining light on the hill, but not the country forcing others to accept our system.

Trump wants out of being the one that runs the world. He wants the US in a greatly reduced role at the UN, NATO, and as a provider of foreign aid. He does eant to be a very rich man.
==========
TRUMP CAMPAIGNED ON NO MORE FOREVER WARS
1) He has so far failed to end the war in Ukraine.
2) He has succeeded in the Abraham Accords and in securing a cease fire, and in greatly reducing Middle East terrorism.
3) Through many threats, trump has helped to stop or shorten many conflicts.
4) He is doing what he can regarding China, no better or worse than most
5) and now, Trump is turning to focus on the Americas.
6) and of course making lots and lots of deals that benefit the US, his family and his friends
====================
WILL THE NEXT COUPLE OF PRESIDENTS MOVE BACK TO THE OLD SYSTEMS?
I suspect not. Europe is much more self-reliant as is the Middle East. We need to move on. After all, it's been over 100 years.

We will probably clean up a bit, reducing Russia's influence in the Americas even more. We will develop an immigration policy that makes sense. And, yes, we will develop CLOSER ties with Canada and Mexico.

Other than that, the focus for the next decade or so will be internal, dealing with our many crises and especially the job situation created by AI and greater automation.

As an old-school conservative who supports the US alliance with NATO and NATO Plus unconditionally, I wish we could restore our relationship with these organizations, but I doubt that will happen. Europe and NATO Plus members have finally realized that they cannot rely on the US, so they are seeking new alliances that exclude America. In particular, Europe is aiming to secure its national security independently of the United States.
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,933
5,132
✟1,056,970.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
As an old-school conservative who supports the US alliance with NATO and NATO Plus unconditionally, I wish we could restore our relationship with these organizations, but I doubt that will happen. Europe and NATO Plus members have finally realized that they cannot rely on the US, so they are seeking new alliances that exclude America. In particular, Europe is aiming to secure its national security independently of the United States.
Why is an independent Europe a bad thing?

Why is it good for Europe or us for Europe to be so dependent on the US and on US leadership?
========
I have supported the US approach for many, many decades. However, it is time to move on.
=========
We need to repair our relationship with Canada, and to continue to extend our 3-country trade agreement with Canada and Mexico.

And yes, reducing Russian influence in the Americas and the Arctic is a better focus for the US. We need to be a strong partner and leader to those in our own hemisphere.
========
ELSEWHERE
We can certainly help when we can and when we are asked, both diplomatically and militarily. That has happened a lot under Trump, most recently in Nigeria.
 
Upvote 0