it's nto a deal if one sides idea of a deal is, "you do it or else."Maybe they're putting up a front to get a better deal. That is how negotiations work.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
it's nto a deal if one sides idea of a deal is, "you do it or else."Maybe they're putting up a front to get a better deal. That is how negotiations work.
Yup. Just as some people go Judge shopping, some people go poll shopping.There's umpteen polls from umpteen sources out there, and one can probably find at least one to satisfy whatever bias confirmation they have.
When things are made up about a situation to make it sound much worse than it really is, that's usually a good indication that it's actually not a big deal. Who are you getting this stuff from?it's nto a deal if one sides idea of a deal is, "you do it or else."
Yeah but that’s hardly likely to endear Denmark to Trump. Helping his enemies is never a good way to go about currying favour with him.Fun fact, the only country to invoke NATO is the United States. And Denmark specifically, sacrificed more of it's citizens in Afghanistain (as a percentage of it's population) - for our protection - than any other member.
Why? What has Trump done that the anti Christ wouldn’t?I don't think it's Trump but I believe he's helping to set the stage.
There is nothing funny about breaching international law, invading an ally, ignoring sovereignty and demolishing a global system that, for all its failings, delivered.I can see the logic from a security point of view. At least have the US play a big part in its security. Its virtually an extension of the US territory and more strategically important to the US than some far away nations in Europe.
Even the EU admits that for security reasons the US should have a stake in Greenland.
But I like that such an option is put on the table. Only someone like Trump would dare raise such an idea. Its refreshing even if its crazy at times lol.
But exciting lol. Just like how they flew in and captured a dictator like a James Bond movie. Maybe they can do that on a larger scale with Greenland.
One minute its Greenland and overnight its suddenly the US lol. Its funny I reckon. How it stirs up the world. Its like "hey you can't do that". Trump says in his funny way "but I just did" lol.
Greenland isn't anywhere close to being an extention of US territory and is closer to the UK and Norway than the US.Its virtually an extension of the US territory and more strategically important to the US than some far away nations in Europe.
What "breaching international law, invading an ally, ignoring sovereignty and demolishing a global system". Has Trump done this lol. Thats the point. Trump has done no such thing and yet people are already claiming he is a dictator. They have been for 10 years now lol.There is nothing funny about breaching international law, invading an ally, ignoring sovereignty and demolishing a global system that, for all its failings, delivered.
Lol, sorry. It was a joke. I don't think everyone sees it the same way. Nothing has happened and people are going crazy over his words. Thats what he does lol. Always has done and its part of his persona I think.Your casual, even juvenile, approval of such behaviour is an offence to every European, every Greenlander, every right thinking person on the planet. Shame on you.
I don't think that would ever happen and its all political talking points. Trump seems to have so far made the world a little bit safer. I don't think its as much of a big bad dictator as people make out.At the height of the cold war the US had many thousands of personnel, in dozens of bases, stationed in Greenland. That same option is available today, without invasion. Only a power hungry fool would favour the aggressive option.
The 1951 treaty requires mutual agreement between the US and Denmark for troop strength changes. "Troop strength" is a matter of sizes and types of military units, not merely numbers of personnel.You should know that the US had 10 times as many troops as now at the Greenland air base during the Cold War. There is iunder the present agreement. While it might be problematic to have lots more, I certainly could see bring the numbers to COld War levels and to hire civilian contractors to search for minerals near the base.
You spelled "ice" wrong. During Arctic winter and much of spring, sea ice around the base is extensive and thick, effectively blocking normal vessel traffic. Vessels typically can navigate the waters only in late summer.===========
Also, the air base is on the water. The US can certainly move naval defenses to international waters near the base to better defend the base.
Sometimes I think you're being satirical.Since a lot of the world relies upon the US to keep them safe, why object to what would help the US in providing even more protection?
When the hyperbole is the breaking a treaty, it's gone too far. That's like a man telling his wife that he's leaving her for another woman as "negotiation" for her to cook steak instead of chicken.What "breaching international law, invading an ally, ignoring sovereignty and demolishing a global system". Has Trump done this lol. Thats the point. Trump has done no such thing and yet people are already claiming he is a dictator. They have been for 10 years now lol.
Lol, sorry. It was a joke. I don't think everyone sees it the same way. Nothing has happened and people are going crazy over his words. Thats what he does lol. Always has done and its part of his persona I think.
The art of deal making. Use hyperbole to bring the issue to attention. Then once that happens start negociations. Its worked a lot of the times and brought changes that I don't think would have happened otherwise.
I don't think that would ever happen and its all political talking points. Trump seems to have so far made the world a little bit safer. I don't think its as much of a big bad dictator as people make out.
Greenland is actually part of the North American continent. Its an extension of the same land mass. Whereas Norway is part of a completely seperate land mass.Greenland isn't anywhere close to being an extention of US territory and is closer to the UK and Norway than the US.
View attachment 375254
Where is the treaty that has been broken. What if the treaty is wrong.When the hyperbole is the breaking a treaty, it's gone too far. That's like a man telling his wife that he's leaving her for another woman as "negotiation" for her to cook steak instead of chicken.
For the US military, there is a hidden point in that.Fun fact, the only country to invoke NATO is the United States. And Denmark specifically, sacrificed more of it's citizens in Afghanistain (as a percentage of it's population) - for our protection - than any other member.
The US Constitution says clearly--it needs no judicial interpretation--that the treaties ratified by Congress are the supreme "law of the land."Where is the treaty that has been broken. What if the treaty is wrong.
If anything it's an extension of canadian territory.Greenland isn't anywhere close to being an extention of US territory and is closer to the UK and Norway than the US.
View attachment 375254
For the US military, there is a hidden point in that.
In my 26 years in the service, I never worked anywhere that NATO troops were not in my unit. US troops in Afghanistan had NATO troops around them. We've lived on their bases. We fought with them as allies. We exercised with them as allies. We created combat tactics with them, and share many of the same actual documents. Most full generals would have been members of NATO units during their careers (a box to check for advancement).
The US Constitution says clearly--it needs no judicial interpretation--that the treaties ratified by Congress are the supreme "law of the land."
The difference between Greenland and Venezuela for the military is that there was no standing law the prohibited us from attacking Venezuela, and Congress did not pass one. But there is standing law that prohibits us from attacking a NATO ally.
An illegal order is an order that breaks a standing law.