Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No. Why can't you back up your claims? Is it because you can't, and you're getting angry at imagined scenarios in your mind? Back up your claims, you said these folks said something, so quote them saying it.
The engine was running with a driver behind the wheel. Law enforcement officers are trained not to walk in front of a vehicle in that situation.
That was his mistake.
Every video shows that he was able to get out of the way without serious injury.
That has yet to be determined.
No, I'm just going off of what Noem and Vance said about it. It was clear enough, coming from a couple of self-proclaimed Christian nationalists who have sent ICE to sweep Blue cities as the Lord's work, and were denouncing Good as a vicious left-wing domestic terrorist before they knew much more about her than her name.
Cool then you can quote us them saying anything remotely of the sort. Let's see it.
Oh, so you made up a scenario in your mind and got angry about it? If not, let's see the quotes. Put up or shut up
It's already been determined, even CNN has stopped trying to deny that she hit him:
I don’t care. The vast majority of Christians are not Christian Nationalists. Your thoughts and ideas are twisted around your hatred of Christianity.
By whom?
There are all sorts of opinions by all sorts of denominations against other denominations. I don’t understand why you so thin skinned thst can’t take the opinion of a couple of people. Not only thin skinned but even affects your understanding of a whole religion system to the point of hating the whole thing. My suggestion to you, if you are a Christian as you profess, is to spend some time in meditation and prayer to remove the hatred from your heart.
Look, the constitution protects religion against the intrusion of the government. The American forefathers included this in the constitution because of the violence between Catholics and Protestants after the reformation. The Catholic Church has enough lawyers to defend itself and so does the rest of us. I’m not concerned with such nonsense. I’m more concerned about people like you spreading hate and untruths because someone in government called your denomination names. Sticks and stones……….
And he did not win did he? Is the AG going to make real headway in breaking the constitution to remove any religion protections from the 1st Ammendment? I doubt it. If you have to hate me then go for it I have pretty thick skin but the hate will eventually get the best of you. At your age you should know this.
The trouble is, you don't know the difference between hatred and contempt. But never mind, your champion, J. D. Vance, has announced that this vicious terrorist attack on an ICE officer will be revenged--he's going to start having ICE officers go house to house. It won't be long before some poor ICE officer gets a face full of goose load and then we'll really have some fun.
I agree. In this case i dont believe its an accurate statement for sure.
Yes she is a radical leftist and totally anti-ICE. That doesn't make her a terrorist alone. And I haven't seen anything to indicate that she or the organization she was involved with was involved either. She was an obstructionist criminal.
If that's the way you want to think of her, or that's the way you believe others will think of her then that's up to you. But I haven't seen any sympathy for her or her family or her kid in this thread. All I see are people posting pictures of bullet holes and screen shots with second by second timelines trying to support the administrations utterly contemptible comments. The fact that the man who is meant to be leading your country can lie about a tragedy like this so blatantly is completely ignored.
Irrelevant. There is no reason to believe the person behind the wheel is going to do what she did. I walk in front of running vehicles all the time. I don't assume the person is going to look at me, put it in drive and then hit me with it.
You are making assumptions which are completely irrelevant unless you can prove what he was thinking at minimum. Which you can't.
It is relevant because it is against the agent's training and DHS protocol to walk in front of a running vehicle with a driver behind the wheel. His failure to follow proper procedures can be used against him if this ever goes to court, whether it be a criminal or civil trial.
It is reasonable to assume the car may move given the situation. People “flee” when approached by LE all the time. Just look how guarded and aware they are during a traffic stop. Good training would be to expect anything.
It has, indeed, been determined by anyone with working eyes, which is why CNN has abandoned the pretense of claiming he wasn't hit, and turned instead to try to question whether he was hit before or after he shot, only for their expert to show that he was hit just before he fired the shots
It depends on the situation. There is no way you can show all law enforcement officers are taught that and that it is a standard for all and for all situations.
Sorry that is not what the protocol says.
He didnt fail to follow proper procedures becauae they arw very explicit. And no where to they say an officer cannot walk in front of a running vehicle with a driver behind the wheel.
At the time 4hwee was no reason to think she would flee. Her passenger was outside the vehicle having a conversation with the officer. When they commanded her to get out of the car he was already walking around the front of the car and was working his way to the left side.
Her intent is irrelevant to the case. Because the officer cannot know her intent. His response to the vehicle coming at him and hitting him and his perception of a threat and thought processes, position and reaction time etc is what really matters.
I do and your is hatred.
Can you point to where I even said anything about Vance? Are you continuing in your tirade and Strawman?
Lol your world is coming to an end. *screams* Maybe you should make an appointment so they don’t take you by surprise. What a bunch of nonsense.
I can't show that all law enforcement officers are taught this, but I would imagine almost all are. I'm certain this agent was since it's written in DHS publications. When I took BLET way back in the 90s, I was taught never to get in front of a vehicle that you stop or a vehicle where you are confronting someone inside. It's a pretty basic concept. @BPPLEE can probably confirm this as well since he once worked in law enforcement.
It is.
No that’s the way the left thinks of her.
Irrelevant.
Awwww you and your buddy trying to guilt others.
I haven’t posted a single picture. You live in Australia what do you care about the president of the US? Are we supposed to care.
I guess Australia can now come take over the US to make it successful.
Here we agree and you are not make it any better, mate.
We weren't taught that but there was a Supreme Court decision that basically said you cannot create jeopardy then claim self defense.
