- Mar 18, 2004
- 71,514
- 8,109
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
At least you are admitting that he hasn’t started the wars.Give him time--he's trying really hard.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
At least you are admitting that he hasn’t started the wars.Give him time--he's trying really hard.
I know that is the Republican spiel but he didn't 'open the border' and the number you state is unsupported.And Biden undid all of what Trump put in place and opened up the border to 20,000,000 illegal aliens to pour in. So what?
When both choices are an evil and a disgrace, what does it matter what I call it? At least the immoral disgrace on my team is able to get things done. The immoral disgrace on your team couldn’t even talk in coherent sentences. And didn’t get anything done she was assigned to take care of.I'm afraid it it. If someoneone points out his multiple failings then it would be a reasonable excuse for you to say 'Well, don't blame me - I didn't vote for him'. If someone asks who in heaven's name put a guy like this in charge, then you have to hold your hand up and accept responsibility. Saying that you didn't have a choice doesn't let you off the hook.
What I guess you could do is agree that he's an absolute disgrace from a moral point of view. Saying he's 'the lesser of two evils' doesn't really cover it.
Yes, he did open the border in that he invited those people to come here with the promise of free housing, free healthcare, free schools, etc. and then he got rid of the policies Trump had in place that were actually effective for decreasing border crossings.I know that is the Republican spiel but he didn't 'open the border' and the number you state is unsupported.
Trump is trying to start a war in Venezuela and the infiltration and taking the president could be seen as war-like. He is threatening Greenland/Denmark.At least you are admitting that he hasn’t started the wars.
No, the number did not match ICE's contact numbers at all.Yes, he did open the border in that he invited those people to come here with the promise of free housing, free healthcare, free schools, etc. and then he got rid of the policies Trump had in place that were actually effective for decreasing border crossings.
That number only reflects the ones that came in through the door. I’m sure there were millions more that came over with mules who completely bypassed the semi-legal route.
It does. Else it reflects on you. It would mean you are ignoring the man he is just because you think his policies are beneficial to you. Personally I don't understand it when people call him out and say they still voted for him. My attitude would be 'a pox on both your parties'. If I think a politician has the morals of an alley cat and has no honour then they'll never get my vote. It's as simple as that. It wouldn't matter in the slightest how beneficial it would be for me.When both choices are an evil and a disgrace, what does it matter what I call it?
I thought you had a doctor's diagnosis or something that might hold up in court.Just read the book that people ON YOUR SIDE put out.
Congressional hearings? LOL.Or go watch the congressional hearings where all this was discussed.
I'm still waiting for you to produce something that will hold up in court.But don’t claim to the purveyors of truth when you can’t be bothered keeping yourselves informed.
The democrats floated like $25B for The Wall, they wanted Trump to at least keep DACA mostly left alone.Not Trumps fault, Democrats were greedy and wanted more than just legal status for dreamers. Just like the “bipartisan” bill this time around (which only included the handful of Republicans-in-Name-Only), the democrats demanded that they control all the terms of the bill. It didn’t take a ”call from Trump” to vote it down. There was nothing remotely bipartisan about it.
What the Supreme Court struck down was Trump’s plan to end DACA.
I totally understand the anti-woke thing.Ah, the Great Replacement theory--blasphemy and sedition all rolled into one.
Look how quick your side stopped being evil. As I said, you will holler about one side and excuse the other. Your fruit is plain too see.The evil on my side is not even close to the evil the other side practices. Trump’s morality is not an evil of my side, it is a personal morality. I don’t call your side evil because Biden has dementia, I call your side evil because TPTB behind him hid it from the public because to get rid of Biden meant Kamala would have to assume power and, at the time, EVERYONE on the left could see who Kamala was and NOBODY wanted her. They were trying to figure out how to get rid of her without sounding the DEI bell. So instead, they formed a shadow government around Biden and used him as their puppet. THAT is what was evil. As well as the policies they implemented through that process.
That was through congress and every public buildings work organization that reviews those actions. In other words, the polar opposite of what Trump is doing.And what about Truman? Please explain that away with hoops and lines.
One thing I’ll give Trump credit, he’s been much more effective in implementing his agenda than any Democrat even could have been.I said in these forums before the election that both candidates were grave dangers to the Republic.
I just wasn't sure at the time which would ruin the Republic beyond recovery within four years.
I'm finding out now. I don't think Kamala would have been this decisive in her destruction of the Republic, nor her administration so effective in carrying it out.
I agree. But that does not make me a Democrat. We have got to stop with this tribalism. If we vote for a candidate we are not obliged to defend their every word and action. In fact our obligation is to hold them accountable as best we can because we were complicit in putting them in office.I said in these forums before the election that both candidates were grave dangers to the Republic.
I just wasn't sure at the time which would ruin the Republic beyond recovery within four years.
I'm finding out now. I don't think Kamala would have been this decisive in her destruction of the Republic, nor her administration so effective in carrying it out.
Plus House and Senate refusing any oversight responsibility.One thing I’ll give Trump credit, he’s been much more effective in implementing his agenda than any Democrat even could have been.
It’s amazing what you can get done when you have no regard towards the law, ethics or even public opinion.