• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Not Woke! Awakened! A Welcome Event

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
23,246
19,131
✟1,526,436.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
. He let No King’s Day happen despite acting in an incredibly childish manner.
Again, he doesn’t get to allow or disallow such gatherings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Red Team - Moderator
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
39,569
22,514
30
Nebraska
✟920,997.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
10,841
5,808
Louisiana
✟322,240.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
"Far more free"? Please share the list of freedoms that you have That I don't.
From Perplexity AI:

Key Differences in FreedomsFreedom of Speech: The U.S. First Amendment offers nearly absolute protection for free speech, including controversial or offensive expressions, whereas in Canada, freedom of expression is explicitly subject to “reasonable limits” defined by law. Canadian authorities may criminalize hate speech, impose restrictions on misinformation, and enforce broader controls over expression than would be possible in America���.Right to Self-Defense: Americans enjoy a constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms (Second Amendment), supporting a strong legal foundation for self-defense, including "castle doctrine" and "stand your ground" laws in many states. In Canada, firearm ownership is far more restricted, and self-defense rights are procedurally and legislatively limited, with such rights not being constitutionally enshrined and subject to government regulation�.Financial Autonomy: The U.S. Constitution provides stronger protections for financial privacy and property rights. Due process protections under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments make it much harder for authorities to freeze assets or seize property without judicial oversight. In Canada, recent high-profile events (e.g., freezing of bank accounts during the 2022 trucker protests) highlighted the government’s broader power to restrict financial access for political reasons�.Judicial and Evidentiary Protections: In the U.S., evidence obtained unlawfully is typically inadmissible in court (“fruit of the poisoned tree” doctrine), providing a stronger deterrent against illegal searches. Canada uses a more flexible test that balances fairness and the impact on the justice system's reputation, potentially allowing more leeway for the Crown to use contested evidence�.Structural and Philosophical DistinctionsRights Limitation: U.S. constitutional rights are considered “negative rights”—freedoms from government action—that cannot be overridden except in extraordinary cases. In contrast, the Canadian Charter allows for broad “reasonable limits” and the “notwithstanding clause,” granting governments the authority to override certain rights for legislative purposes���.Collective vs. Individual Rights: The Canadian system explicitly balances individual rights against collective interests and minority protections, whereas U.S. rights are fundamentally individualistic, with group rights typically not constitutionally prioritized��.In summary, Americans generally enjoy broader and more absolute protections for free expression, self-defense, and property than Canadians, reflecting foundational differences in constitutional philosophy and legal frameworks���.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vambram

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Red Team - Moderator
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
39,569
22,514
30
Nebraska
✟920,997.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
He let it happen? That suggests that you think he may have had a choice.
I have no further comment. I do have serious issues with him, but am relieved to know term limits happen. He won’t be around forever.
 
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
4,140
3,169
Midwest
✟392,466.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There's more than enough evidence to support the point of view as whom funded those protests. If you choose to ignore it, that is your choice to make.
Speaking of being funded. I don't think this ICE protester was supposed to say this out loud. Oops! :oops:

 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vambram

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
29,628
16,810
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟475,563.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
From Perplexity AI:

Key Differences in FreedomsFreedom of Speech: The U.S. First Amendment offers nearly absolute protection for free speech, including controversial or offensive expressions, whereas in Canada, freedom of expression is explicitly subject to “reasonable limits” defined by law. Canadian authorities may criminalize hate speech, impose restrictions on misinformation, and enforce broader controls over expression than would be possible in America���.Right to Self-Defense: Americans enjoy a constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms (Second Amendment), supporting a strong legal foundation for self-defense, including "castle doctrine" and "stand your ground" laws in many states. In Canada, firearm ownership is far more restricted, and self-defense rights are procedurally and legislatively limited, with such rights not being constitutionally enshrined and subject to government regulation�.Financial Autonomy: The U.S. Constitution provides stronger protections for financial privacy and property rights. Due process protections under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments make it much harder for authorities to freeze assets or seize property without judicial oversight. In Canada, recent high-profile events (e.g., freezing of bank accounts during the 2022 trucker protests) highlighted the government’s broader power to restrict financial access for political reasons�.Judicial and Evidentiary Protections: In the U.S., evidence obtained unlawfully is typically inadmissible in court (“fruit of the poisoned tree” doctrine), providing a stronger deterrent against illegal searches. Canada uses a more flexible test that balances fairness and the impact on the justice system's reputation, potentially allowing more leeway for the Crown to use contested evidence�.Structural and Philosophical DistinctionsRights Limitation: U.S. constitutional rights are considered “negative rights”—freedoms from government action—that cannot be overridden except in extraordinary cases. In contrast, the Canadian Charter allows for broad “reasonable limits” and the “notwithstanding clause,” granting governments the authority to override certain rights for legislative purposes���.Collective vs. Individual Rights: The Canadian system explicitly balances individual rights against collective interests and minority protections, whereas U.S. rights are fundamentally individualistic, with group rights typically not constitutionally prioritized��.In summary, Americans generally enjoy broader and more absolute protections for free expression, self-defense, and property than Canadians, reflecting foundational differences in constitutional philosophy and legal frameworks���.
What a sad little list where nothing really contributes to a quality of life.
It's like a list that allows people to do worse things.

Racist? You're cool.
Mentally unhinged? You can still get a gun. Don't sweat it.
Using money to break the law? Gharder for government to see it. No worries
 
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
10,841
5,808
Louisiana
✟322,240.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What a sad little list where nothing really contributes to a quality of life.
It's like a list that allows people to do worse things.

Racist? You're cool.
Mentally unhinged? You can still get a gun. Don't sweat it.
Using money to break the law? Gharder for government to see it. No worries
You think the bill of rights is a "sad little list." Got it. Why on earth did the founding fathers put such a pesky little list in the Constitution?
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
10,388
5,283
83
Goldsboro NC
✟295,412.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
You think the bill of rights is a "sad little list." Got it. Why on earth did the founding fathers put such a pesky little list in the Constitution?
They forsaw people like you coming along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bradskii
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
10,841
5,808
Louisiana
✟322,240.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
They forsaw people like you coming along.
That statement made no sense whatsoever. Care to explain, or is this just a cheap hit and run?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danthemailman
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
10,841
5,808
Louisiana
✟322,240.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Again, he doesn’t get to allow or disallow such gatherings.
It's funny how they shout "no kings" to protest tyrannical dictators, but complain when Trump arrests tyrannical dictators.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
10,388
5,283
83
Goldsboro NC
✟295,412.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
It's funny how they shout "no kings" to protest tyrannical dictators, but complain when Trump arrests tyrannical dictators.
And replaces them with their equally dictatorial second-in-command.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
29,628
16,810
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟475,563.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
It's funny how they shout "no kings" to protest tyrannical dictators, but complain when Trump arrests tyrannical dictators.
without congressional approval.

I remember when you advocated for a noninterventionist president.
 
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
10,841
5,808
Louisiana
✟322,240.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
without congressional approval.

I remember when you advocated for a noninterventionist president.
I advocated for "America First." Which means intervention should only be necessary when it serves the interest of the United States. But if I recall, I have explained that to you before, and I do not want to "play chess with pigeons." To clarify, I am not calling you a pigeon.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
29,628
16,810
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟475,563.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
I advocated for "America First." Which means intervention should only be necessary when it serves the interest of the United States. But if I recall, I have explained that to you before, and I do not want to "play chess with pigeons." To clarify, I am not calling you a pigeon.
Whatever it takes.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,350
14,397
Earth
✟273,378.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
I advocated for "America First." Which means intervention should only be necessary when it serves the interest of the United States. But if I recall, I have explained that to you before, and I do not want to "play chess with pigeons." To clarify, I am not calling you a pigeon.
This wasn’t an “intervention“, this was an arrest…the U.S. can’t grab a private Venezuelan for crimes they committed in the United States, while they are in Venezuela*; much less a de facto head-of-state.

Who’s going stop us?, has never been a viable political movement in a free-society.
Why’re we trying it (again)?

*This is what extradition-treaties is fer!
 
Upvote 0