Yes, in the context of a time sensitive situation where the police are outnumbered by a mob of people, and an SUV parks across the road to block them, and people are getting out of cars to be confrontational, that's an equal level of provocation.
No, it really isn't.
Noting, that same officer had been in that situation before, and ended up getting dragged 100 yards by a person pulling the "hit the gas" routine.
He busted out a window, tased the guy, and his arm got stuck. More poor judgment on his part. Sounds like he really just shouldn't be allowed around cars, TBH.
For the record, people have been whining and complaining when they use non-lethal force as well.
When mobs of people surround them and deploy tear gas, people pee and moan about that as well and claim it's assault.
So, what, because they complain about the use of non-lethal force they can't complain about
lethal force?
CBP and ICE both have extensive, documented issues with their use of force, both lethal and non-lethal, over the past year. There are undoubtedly situations in which it's appropriate to apply both, but the frequent use of excessive force in situations where it was
not warranted have, understandably, made a lot of people skeptical about any use of force
Not true.
You're conveniently drawing the line in the place (for this case specifically) where you want it to be in order to lay the blame solely at the feet of the people who are on the team you don't like.
Nope. If, for whatever reason, she had decided to run over the officer, I'd be blaming her for escalating to lethal force. But she didn't.
So when those protestors were out blocking roads, and some cars would occasionally do a slow roll and end up bumping into them until they'd eventually get out of the road, and then they'd scream bloody murder and people would say "that should be considered attempted murder, they have no right to bump a person with their car"
Those people claiming that the drivers of the cars should be charged are wrong then, correct? After all, the people could've just moved and gotten out of the way instead of standing in the road.
I've never said that she shouldn't have been charged with a crime if she did bump the officer. The "move out of the way" qualifier is part of the guidelines around use of lethal force, so unless you're arguing that protestors should be allowed to shoot drivers if they think they're in danger of being hit, I don't see the relevance.
Likewise, the woman in this situation had ample opportunity to say "my bad, I'll move my car and get out of here" and that likely would've been the end of it.
That is,
quite literally, what she was doing when she was shot. Her last words - to the officer who would go on to shoot her less than 30 seconds later - were "It's fine, I'm not mad at you."