Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
IIRC the officer was in a similar situation where someone try to run him over and dragged him causing some injuries. I agree with you that maybe he should not have been there if he had some form of ptsd.
The car wasnt moving forward when he was moving around front of it. Which is perfectly fine to do. He shouldn't be expecting the driver to put the car in drive and rhen accelerate toward him.
I don't believe it is. Witness confirmed that she was part of the group trying to block and interfere and prevent ICE from doing their job. She was trying block them. They had every right to detain her.
Of course there was a need to detain her. Its irrelevant completely, if she was not doing anything directly threatening up until that moment. SHE is the one that put rhem at risk when SHE elected to accelerate away from the officers who were attempting to detain her.
The responsibility to de-escalate does not include letting violators go or NOT commanding her to stop and get out of the car. De-escalation does not mean officers are not supposed to issue commands.
See above
She was. And according to the Terry Stop case LE is allowed to stop you when you are seen in circumstances which lead an officer to believe you have been, are or about to commit an offense.
It is if the officer has reason to believe he is in danger of serious bodily injury and death. Especially when he has a second to make that decision when a vehicle is accelerating toward them.
Federal agents doing their lawful duty to enforce democratically created laws are not harassing anyone.
Tug your forelock? lol Have not heard that in ages.
I’d like it if some investigative reporter would talk to the mall where he had been previously employed*, for background information.
No, they have to harass people to harass them. You don't want to go down that "democratically elected laws" rabbit hole. There are too many executive orders, edicts from Noem and Homan, and court rulings ignored in between.
Be sure and tug your forelock.
They certainly can be. And thats why we have investigations and case law to deal with them.
Yes I do think this kind of proclamation is not good. I don't believe she is a domestic terrorist. I think she was also agitator who was breaking the law. But a terrorist, no.
Yes they are.
Wrong. If these officers were trained in using better judgment these incidents wouldn’t happen. It’s not like this is an isolated case. Jumpy police shooting people who didn’t need to be killed has been an ongoing issue in this country and we know ICE have even less training than a regular police officer, especially now with their lowered hiring standards. All of this could have easily been prevented if we had some professionals doing the job.
Yes I do. They are being asked to enforce democratically created laws. The fact that some don't want them to is irrelevant.
More inflammatory rhetoric.Be sure and tug your forelock.
The disaster was caused by leaders who lied to the American public, claiming the border was safe, secure, and closed, while secretly even flying in more people. All to seize political control of the country. More than ten million during one administration. Human trafficking rose to a level not seen since here the Civil War. Rather than work through their elected representatives to change the law, entitled radicals are breaking the law and interfering with those who are trying to locate the missing children and arrest the violent criminals.
But blocking their vehicle, while your friend hops out to jaw at the other officer certainly an escalation, wouldn't you say?
www.cbsnews.com
I don't think AI is a factor in this one
www.cbsnews.com
