Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If that is the case why are they not putting forth their own group instead of following worldly man.1. they have the perfect standard for right vs wrong.
2. they have the Holy Spirit to guide them.
3. they have the body of Christ to help them in their discernment.
4. they have at least one gift of the Holy Spirit, which might include wisdom, knowledge, prophecy, discernment, etc
Maybe because other Christians keep telling them to not talk about politics.If that is the case why are they not putting forth their own group instead of following worldly man.
I presume you meant "talking heads."Many think Christian’s should not have a voice in the public square which is wrong. But when one is preaching, it should not turn into a temporal worldly rant about temporal thingsbut eternal things. That is what that helps Christians discern and navigate in a dark world. Not taking heads from the pulpit.![]()
Because not everyone knows when a candidate promotes murder, theft, adultery and disrespect to parents. But even if they do know, it is not a problem to point out sin, unless you reject John the baptist's and Jesus' messages about politicians.
Many think Christian’s should not have a voice in the public square which is wrong. But when one is preaching, it should not turn into a temporal worldly rant about temporal thingsbut eternal things. That is what that helps Christians discern and navigate in a dark world. Not taking heads from the pulpit.![]()
Maybe. Depends on what that candidate endorses. Murder, theft, adultery, homosexuality? Or kindness, diligence, patience, peace?It appears you are suggesting that a pastor should promote or endorse a political candidate. If your pastor were to endorse a Democrat politician for the 2028 presidential election, would you continue attending that church?
Which one endorsed kindness, diligence, patience, and peace?Maybe. Depends on what that candidate endorses. Murder, theft, adultery, homosexuality? Or kindness, diligence, patience, peace?
Why do you ask?
Maybe. Depends on what that candidate endorses. Murder, theft, adultery, homosexuality? Or kindness, diligence, patience, peace?
Why do you ask?
They will until they get elected. Then its back to self-interest. Mr Smith Goes to Washington caught on because people love fantasy to escape real life.Which one endorsed kindness, diligence, patience, and peace?
Even though God says to support His Kingdom over mankind's? I realize the Church failed Him, taking what Jesus refused in the desert, but that does not give individuals the right to follow suit.As long as the pastor teaches in the church from a biblical perspective—covering topics such as morality, sanctity of life or marriage, homosexuality, loving your neighbor, loving your enemies, caring for widows, and supporting orphans—you will be equipped to determine whom to support.
I can't recall either candidate endorsing "kindness, diligence, patience, and peace" even during the race.They will until they get elected. Then its back to self-interest. Mr Smith Goes to Washington caught on because people love fantasy to escape real life.
If I respect my pastor (hopefully we all will), then his opinion would be valuable in making my decision. As fallable men, pastors should not be wholly relied upon, as you stated correctly below.Ultimately, it is not the pastor’s endorsement that will influence your decision; rather, you will choose which candidate to support based on specific criteria.
Unnecessary? Were we talking about necessity of candidate endorsement? I thought the topic was about whether politics (governmental topics) should be spoken of in churches. Such goes way beyond mere political endorsements, as I hope you would realize.Therefore, it is unnecessary to be concerned with whether or not the pastor endorses a candidate or discusses politics.
I agree, but if he does, is it a problem if he also tells his congregants which candidate he feels most closely aligns to the principles he is teaching them?As long as the pastor teaches in the church from a biblical perspective—covering topics such as morality, sanctity of life or marriage, homosexuality, loving your neighbor, loving your enemies, caring for widows, and supporting orphans—you will be equipped to determine whom to support.
Are we talking about a particular office? Certainly the question goes well beyond a single office, don't you think?I can't recall either candidate endorsing "kindness, diligence, patience, and peace" even during the race.
Jimmy Carter may have.
The Church failed Him? What church are you speaking of?Even though God says to support His Kingdom over mankind's? I realize the Church failed Him, taking what Jesus refused in the desert, but that does not give individuals the right to follow suit.
Yes he was a good example of one who tried, as in Canada, we had a pastor named Tommy Douglas who brought about, while in Govt., equal access to healthcare for all. He was a true man of the people. But neither were able to change the beast in which they worked. It seems God is more interested in this life, that individuals will accomplish more within the whole than the whole itself. That is until his Kingdom comes and his Will will be done in earth.Jimmy Carter may have.
I have a problem with that, and I would not attend that church, if that's the kind of church you want, it's a free country—you can go there.I agree, but if he does, is it a problem if he also tells his congregants which candidate he feels most closely aligns to the principles he is teaching them?
The part I emphasized, for sure.Yes he was a good example of one who tried, as in Canada, we had a pastor named Tommy Douglas who brought about, while in Govt., equal access to healthcare for all. He was a true man of the people. But neither were able to change the beast in which they worked. It seems God is more interested in this life, that individuals will accomplish more within the whole than the whole itself. That is until his Kingdom comes and his Will will be done in earth.