Is Tithing even necessary?

timothyu said:

Meaning in Europe the government supports churches while in the US churches support the government?

Click to expand...

No. Meaning in Europe the government supports churches while in the US the government doesn't.

Well in Europa the Church created the earthly kingdoms

Larniavc said:

UK.

Click to expand...

Well, the UK does have an official state church.

The US does not.

Historically giving and providing for those in need by those with the means has been regarded as a Christian moral obligation. Not tithing, but giving. This has been the moral foundation for the historic Christian criticism against the hoarding of wealth. With the notable caveat that this criticism has not always been consistent, and the interplay between Church and politics has at times resulted in justifying power and wealth accumulation rather than how it ought to be. Though there has also been a long history of moral reformers who have rose up to remind the Church of her sacred obligation toward those in need.

"For if what you’ve claimed were true, that you have kept from your youth the commandment of love, and have given to each person as much as to yourself, how has it come to you, this abundance of money? For it takes wealth to care for the needy: a little paid out for the necessity of each person you take on, and all at once everything gets parceled out, and is spent upon them. Thus, the man who loves his neighbor as himself will have acquired no more than what his neighbor has; whereas you, visibly, have acquired a lot. Where has this come from? Or is it not clear, that it comes from making your private enjoyment more important than helping other people? Therefore, however much you exceed in wealth, so much so do you fall short in love: else long since you’d have taken care to be divorced from your money, if you had loved your neighbor. But now your money sticks to you closer than the limbs of your body, and he who would separate you from it grieves you more than someone who would cut off your vital parts. For if you had clothed the naked, if you had given your bread to the hungry, if you had opened your doors to every stranger, if you’d become a father to orphans, if you had suffered together with all the powerless, what possessions would now be causing you despondency? Why should you now be upset to put aside what’s left, when you’d long since have taken care to distribute these things to the needy?" - St. Basil the Great, Homily To the Rich

Why tithe to a church? That is not acting in servitude to each other.

NBB said:

Tithing is no where to be found in the NT, they donated even houses sometimes, but
the bible says that you give from the generosity of your heart and not for obligation.
I don't like some churches say you are going to be less blessed etc if you don't tithe.
However i met God by tithing, so i would think that he blesses giving.

Click to expand...

Agreed!
Examine the great examples given us:
2 Corinthians 8
2 Corinthians 9

Especially 2 Corinthians 8:11-12
and , 2 Corinthians 9:6-8

It’s quite clear it is a cheerful and generous heart God looks for us to have in our giving.
Paul quotes Jesus as saying, it is better to give than to receive.
Paul was told not to forget the poor in his ministry.
Paul ommands the rich to be generous and willing to share.
We can go on quoting such Scripture. However, we are not under compulsion to give. Therefore no OT tithe is in effect. Let God govern your heart in giving.

Some folks have knowledge of more needs to contribute to than others and may then break up their giving while others give a bunch in one area… if our giving is from the heart we can trust God will govern the good distribution and also make pockets of need made know to the giving body of Christ.

throughfierytrial said:

Agreed!
Examine the great examples given us:
2 Corinthians 8
2 Corinthians 9

Especially 2 Corinthians 8:11-12
and , 2 Corinthians 9:6-8

Click to expand...

People don't pay attention to 2 Corinthians 8: 13-15

For I do not mean that others should be eased and you burdened; but by an equality, that now at this time your abundance may supply their lack, that their abundance also may supply your lack—that there may be equality. As it is written, “He who gathered much had nothing left over, and he who gathered little had no lack.”

Click to expand...

Americans hate those two verses. I once listened to a pastor on the radio reading that chapter aloud, and he literally skipped over those two verses as though they weren't there. He knew what that word "equality" entailed, and he didn't want to say it.

Not only does Paul stipulate twice that the goal is economic (because for sure he's talking about money) equality among Christians, but he goes even further with the OT reference by mapping the economy of the Church to the economy of the Israelites in the wilderness.

The Israelites did not tithe in the wilderness; they began tithing only after they entered the Promised Land. In the wilderness, they were on the "manna economy." Likewise, the Body of Christ is not yet in our Promised Land. We are still in the wilderness--on the Manna Economy.

God had decreed that each person got only an omer of manna per day. However some collected "much." How much is "much?" More than an omer. Some collected "little." How much is "little?" Less than an omer.

But the scripture says that when all the manna among those who collected more and those who collected less was measured out, everyone had exactly an omer. Some people would say that God just miraculously made all the bowls come out equal. But if that had been the Jewish or Christian understanding at the time, Paul could not have used it as a reference to ask the churches to share. Someone would have logically said, "Let God fill their bowls miraculously." No, Paul understood that each of the Israelites got their omer because those who collected much redistributed their manna to those who collected little.

RDKirk said:

People don't pay attention to 2 Corinthians 8: 13-15



Americans hate those two verses. I once listened to a pastor on the radio reading that chapter aloud, and he literally skipped over those two verses as though they weren't there. He knew what that word "equality" entailed, and he didn't want to say it.

Not only does Paul stipulate twice that the goal is economic (because for sure he's talking about money) equality among Christians, but he goes even further with the OT reference by mapping the economy of the Church to the economy of the Israelites in the wilderness.

The Israelites did not tithe in the wilderness; they began tithing only after they entered the Promised Land. In the wilderness, they were on the "manna economy." Likewise, the Body of Christ is not yet in our Promised Land. We are still in the wilderness--on the Manna Economy.

God had decreed that each person got only an omer of manna per day. However some collected "much." How much is "much?" More than an omer. Some collected "little." How much is "little?" Less than an omer.

But the scripture says that when all the manna among those who collected more and those who collected less was measured out, everyone had exactly an omer. Some people would say that God just miraculously made all the bowls come out equal. But if that had been the Jewish or Christian understanding at the time, Paul could not have used it as a reference to ask the churches to share. Someone would have logically said, "Let God fill their bowls miraculously." No, Paul understood that each of the Israelites got their omer because those who collected much redistributed their manna to those who collected little.

Click to expand...

Hello and greetings!

I understand your concerns and thoughts; I believe so anyway.

However, reflect further ton he miraculous nature of God's provision of equity as many do, including myself. All went out gathering manna with good intentions of obeying God's command, yet some fell short of the required measure while others had surplus and yet all had what was required.

We know the Isrealites were to care for the poor among them...this was stipulated in various laws like not going over their fields twice, etc to leave it for the poor and widows and aliens and even the wild animals. Obedience to these types of laws provided an equity that does not equate with equal means for both parties. I am understanding your post to mean you interpret it as materially equal outcome. Only God can provide that, in my view. For instance God spreads His spiritual gifts out in differing proportions to different members of His body, yet, same outcome... they all inherit eternal life. On the order of the greatest is the least and the least is the greatest.

We know Paul speaks of giving and generosity, the rich and the poor. He speaks to those who are idlers warning them to work hard using their hands so they may earn their own bread and to have something to share. Jesus speaks of hoarders of wealth such as the parable of the rich man storing away in barns as a danger to his soul. We give with the goal of providing equity among the churches, I interpret. The necessary supply is in the perception of the giver, and this is a product of a Christian's wisdom as pertains to money and economy as well as his heart and soul...does he perceive himself, truly and honestly, to be giving generously and in keeping with his income and does he have true concern for the needs of his brothers. God only knows the heart. This is not to imply that there is no time or place to do some educating as well as warning against making this earth their home rather than building their treasures in heaven.

Scripture directly states that we are not under compulsion to give and we should be generous and cheerful givers. I believe this attribute grows with Christian maturity and I base this on passages like James 1:9-11 You see from these passages that the rich lose their "luster" once their view changes to build their treasures in heaven not in this world.

Are we thinking alike or not?