• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

House passes Republican health care bill

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
13,189
6,347
Minnesota
✟353,558.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
  • Optimistic
Reactions: GoldenBoy89

JosephZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2017
5,009
4,952
Davao City
Visit site
✟327,696.00
Country
Philippines
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Finally a bill that will actually cut costs for patients instead of making insurance companies wealthier.
Don't get excited; it's not going anywhere and will die in the Senate. Meanwhile, health insurance premiums are about to get a lot more expensive for millions of Americans since there wasn't a vote to extend ACA subsidies.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
13,189
6,347
Minnesota
✟353,558.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Don't get excited; it's not going anywhere and will die in the Senate. Meanwhile, health insurance premiums are about to get a lot more expensive for millions of Americans since there wasn't a vote to extend ACA subsidies.
I hope Democrats don't block more affordable insurance. We can all contact our senators and ask for a "yes" vote for the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act!
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
27,218
30,125
LA
✟674,502.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
  • Agree
Reactions: Desk trauma
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
23,483
17,414
55
USA
✟441,997.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat

Finally a bill that will actually cut costs for patients instead of making insurance companies wealthier.
How will it do that?

The first part was something about forming insurance groups for groups of employers, the second was some thing about pharmacy benefit managers that won't take effect until 30 months after passage.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
13,189
6,347
Minnesota
✟353,558.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
How will it do that?

The first part was something about forming insurance groups for groups of employers, the second was some thing about pharmacy benefit managers that won't take effect until 30 months after passage.
"the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act contains a strong initial set of policies that expand choice, particularly for small employers, enhance competition and transparency, and reduce ACA silver plan premiums by 12 percent while lowering federal spending by roughly $30 billion."
" . . .policymakers should consider expanding access to guarantee renewable short-term health-insurance plans, opening up ACA catastrophic plans, taking steps to expand access to HSAs, and site neutral payment reform in government programs."
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
23,483
17,414
55
USA
✟441,997.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
"the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act contains a strong initial set of policies that expand choice, particularly for small employers, enhance competition and transparency, and reduce ACA silver plan premiums by 12 percent while lowering federal spending by roughly $30 billion."
Mmmkay.
" . . .policymakers should consider expanding access to guarantee renewable short-term health-insurance plans, opening up ACA catastrophic plans, taking steps to expand access to HSAs, and site neutral payment reform in government programs."
It's hard to evaluate a plan with complex language that I'd never heard of before it was passed.
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,641
9,686
65
Martinez
✟1,203,510.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
After much research, the "Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act," will be disastrous as under its hood are missing parts! Here is the conclusion of my research:

AI Generated

The core superiority of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) structure over the expanded Association Health Plans (AHPs), as proposed in the House bill, lies in its guaranteed consumer protections and market stability. While the "Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act" aims to lower monthly premiums by formally expanding AHPs (which pool members to gain large-group status) and introducing Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) transparency, it achieves lower premiums partly by allowing AHPs to avoid key ACA mandates. This means that unlike ACA-compliant plans, expanded AHPs are generally not required to cover all ten Essential Health Benefits (such as maternity care and mental health services), potentially exposing enrollees to catastrophic out-of-pocket costs for excluded necessary care. Furthermore, critics contend that by drawing healthier workers into these less-regulated, cheaper plans, the AHP expansion could destabilize the comprehensive ACA individual and small-group markets, causing premiums to rise further for sicker individuals who rely on the ACA's robust coverage.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,641
9,686
65
Martinez
✟1,203,510.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Own research, AI generated, pick one.
Both. Took me about an hour to get all the information, then formulate it with the help of AI to clearly relate the findings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
15,788
9,631
53
✟414,914.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Upvote 0

Laodicean60

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2023
5,116
2,472
65
NM
✟107,873.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
extend ACA subsidies
Sounds like you're saying this bill removed all ACA subsidies. They are allowing the enhanced subsidies introduced under the Biden administration to expire, maybe COVID?
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
29,399
17,605
Here
✟1,552,892.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I don't know that this is actually "lowering healthcare costs for patients".

It may provide a lower monthly premium option that's less of a monthly expenditure for "policy holders", but then becomes wildly more expensive once a person goes from mere "policy holder" to "actual patient"

The monthly premium reduction by going from a more comprehensive policy to a high-deductible HSA or "catastrophic" plan would be easily offset by 10-fold the first time a person has any healthcare needs that go beyond a yearly physical or tele-doc visit for a sinus infection.


For example, switching from a comprehensive plan (with reasonable out of pocket limits, and deductibles) for $300/month to a high deductible HSA for $90/month.

Sure, you may be saving $2500/year on premium payments...

However, even something somewhat common like a broken ankle, needing to get an appendix taken out, tonsils out, etc...

When you have to meet a $7500 deductible followed by an 20/80 split for the remaining amount until a $15,000 max out of pocket is reached... A broken ankle can effectively wipe you out.


For some reason it reminds me of that Monty Python "Insurance Sketch"

"Well you see, you went with our never-pay policy, which is a great way to save money if you never file a claim"


Perhaps a more accurate way for them to have framed it is "More affordable, until something actually happens"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,909
20,647
Finger Lakes
✟335,194.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sounds like you're saying this bill removed all ACA subsidies. They are allowing the enhanced subsidies introduced under the Biden administration to expire, maybe COVID?
Not extending has the same result as removing, but the not extending was done by the Big Beautiful Bill.
 
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,270
6,570
Utah
✟888,009.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Finally a bill that will actually cut costs for patients instead of making insurance companies wealthier.
It will have to pass the senate ... I'm not confident it will
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0