Tim Walz Vows to Bring More Somalis to Minnesota, Despite Growing Fraud Scandal Reaching Into the Billions

Postvieww · 2025-12-17T09:38:16-0600

Pommer said:
The data are the data and confirms the Somalian immigrants tend to commit the ~~sin~~ crime of being poor.

Some found a way out by stealing government funds.

BCP1928 · 2025-12-17T09:53:29-0600

Postvieww said:
Some found a way out by stealing government funds.

So all of them are "garbage" and should be deported. Got it.

Postvieww · 2025-12-17T11:07:40-0600

BCP1928 said:
So all of them are "garbage" and should be deported. Got it.

Do you know the definition of the word “SOME”? You definitely did not get it,

BCP1928 · 2025-12-17T11:11:38-0600

Postvieww said:
Do you know the definition of the word “SOME”? You definitely did not get it,

Sure I do. It's a modifier Trump should have used.

civilwarbuff · 2025-12-17T11:12:37-0600

DaisyDay said:
Whereas the Rs prefer to do their own criming themselves?

Well, at least they would be honest about it!!!

civilwarbuff · 2025-12-17T11:15:17-0600

Dunno, what wa

wing2000 said:
Is that your answer to my question?

Dunno, what was your question?

civilwarbuff · 2025-12-17T11:27:59-0600

The

A2SG said:
Gee, remind me again, in the last election, which party ran a convicted felon

The convicted part remains to be seen (since it is still under appeal).

A2SG said:
which ran someone who prosecuted criminals?

The D's ran her for 2 reasons, and 2 reasons only: 1. She is female (unless she has declined to answer that question), and 2. She claims to be black (even though she is bi-racial). I guess the other 1/2 is not politically advantageous.

JosephZ · 2025-12-17T11:51:48-0600

civilwarbuff said:
The convicted part remains to be seen (since it is still under appeal).

As of today, December 17, 2025, Trump is a convicted felon. His appeal doesn't change that.

Aryeh Jay · 2025-12-17T12:10:46-0600

BCP1928 said:
So all of them are "garbage" and should be deported. Got it.

At least they aren't eating the pets. Yet.

BCP1928 · 2025-12-17T12:16:07-0600

Aryeh Jay said:
At least they aren't eating the pets. Yet.

They can't. Cat meat is Haram, forbidden by the Quran as the meat of "fanged beasts of prey." No dogs, either.

Aryeh Jay · 2025-12-17T12:20:00-0600

BCP1928 said:
They can't. Cat meat is Haram, forbidden by the Quran as the meat of "fanged beasts of prey." No dogs, either.

A pet friendly haven.

Vambram · 2025-12-17T16:36:05-0600

MN lawmaker says ‘unbelievable’ assisted-living fraud scheme includes indicted figure still getting state pay

Minnesota lawmakers said in a Wednesday hearing that they have found even more fraud in the state in addition to an indicted fraudster continuing to receive taxpayer funds.

www.foxnews.com

A2SG · 2025-12-17T22:43:43-0600

civilwarbuff said:
The

The convicted part remains to be seen (since it is still under appeal).

Nope. He was convicted, that's a fact. If that changes as a result of the appeal (as unlikely as that may be), then he'll simply be a former convicted felon.

civilwarbuff said:
The D's ran her for 2 reasons, and 2 reasons only: 1. She is female (unless she has declined to answer that question), and 2. She claims to be black (even though she is bi-racial). I guess the other 1/2 is not politically advantageous

Regardless of why she ran, the point was, if any party can be said to "partner up with criminals," it's more likely to be the one with the convicted felon as a candidate, not the one with a prosecutor.

civilwarbuff said:
(staff edit)

No, it still happened. A lot would necessarily depend on the reasons given for the reversal, if that happens. That Trump committed the acts he was proven guilty of seems pretty conclusively demonstrated by evidence, so I highly doubt he'll be found to not have falsified business documents. Let's not forget, appeals courts don't reexamine the evidence, appeals are based on legal issues, not matters of fact. So, even if the conviction is overturned somehow on some legal technicality, he will simply be yet another rich guy who committed fraud and got away with it.

-- A2SG, no shortage of those out there....

Vambram · 2025-12-17T22:46:54-0600

A2SG said:
Nope. He was convicted, that's a fact. If that changes as a result of the appeal (as unlikely as that may be), then he'll simply be a former convicted felon.

Regardless of why she ran, the point was, if any party can be said to "partner up with criminals," it's more likely to be the one with the convicted felon as a candidate, not the one with a prosecutor.

No, it still happened. A lot would necessarily depend on the reasons given for the reversal, if that happens. That Trump committed the acts he was proven guilty of seems pretty conclusively demonstrated by evidence, so I highly doubt he'll be found to not have falsified business documents. Let's not forget, appeals courts don't reexamine the evidence, appeals are based on legal issues, not matters of fact. So, even if the conviction is overturned somehow on some legal technicality, he will simply be yet another rich guy who committed fraud and got away with it.

-- A2SG, no shortage of those guys out there....

Only liberals really believe President Trump has committed fraud. The rest of the nation denounced that belief in November 2024.

A2SG · 2025-12-17T22:51:12-0600

Vambram said:
Only liberals really believe President Trump has committed fraud.

Well, them...and all 12 members of the jury who saw the evidence and were convinced, beyond the shadow of a doubt, of his guilt.

Vambram said:
The rest of the nation denounced that belief in November 2024.

People can often believe any number of untrue things.

-- A2SG, not exactly a shortage of them either....

Hans Blaster · 2025-12-18T00:34:25-0600

Vambram said:
Only liberals really believe President Trump has committed fraud. The rest of the nation denounced that belief in November 2024.

That's not how trials work.

Postvieww · 2025-12-18T07:33:12-0600

A2SG said:
Nope. He was convicted, that's a fact. If that changes as a result of the appeal (as unlikely as that may be), then he'll simply be a former convicted felon.

Yes he was convicted in a kangaroo court by a rogue judge and procecutor in a blue state . With multiple reasons for appeal. It was a sham of a trial that many liberals still salivate over as a trophy conviction.

A2SG said:
Regardless of why she ran, the point was, if any party can be said to "partner up with criminals," it's more likely to be the one with the convicted felon as a candidate, not the one with a prosecutor.

It remains to be seen if she will be convicted, but the deranged prosecutor who ran on “getting Trump” actually according to public records committed the same type of fraud she drummed up against Trump. As for Harris she was a weak incompetent candidate who had no business even running. Do you forget she did not win the nomination she was installed by a cabal with no regard for the voters and real supporters of the Democrat party.

A2SG said:
No, it still happened. A lot would necessarily depend on the reasons given for the reversal, if that happens. That Trump committed the acts he was proven guilty of seems pretty conclusively demonstrated by evidence, so I highly doubt he'll be found to not have falsified business documents. Let's not forget, appeals courts don't reexamine the evidence, appeals are based on legal issues, not matters of fact. So, even if the conviction is overturned somehow on some legal technicality, he will simply be yet another rich guy who committed fraud and got away with it.

-- A2SG, no shortage of those out there....

Don’t be so sure of yourself. In your zeal to besmirch Trump you could wind up with a reversal. If someone was falsely convicted with shoddy court proceedings it was a false and unwarranted conviction. But I do realize the “I hate Trump crowd “ will always claim victory even though it was ill gotten gain.

Postvieww · 2025-12-18T07:44:11-0600

Hans Blaster said:
That's not how trials work.

You incorrectly assume all trials are constitutionally upstanding and run by competent judges and prosecutors. It is a provable fact that we unfortunately have some rogue judges and prosecutors some of which are currently in legal hot water themselves. That is how the justice system actually works . Just because Trump was convicted in a kangaroo court by liberal activists does not show justice was actually served. The final chapter is still being written. Stay tuned.

comana · 2025-12-18T07:54:16-0600

Postvieww said:
You incorrectly assume all trials are constitutionally upstanding and run by competent judges and prosecutors. It is a provable fact that we unfortunately have some rogue judges and prosecutors some of which are currently in legal hot water themselves. That is how the justice system actually works . Just because Trump was convicted in a kangaroo court by liberal activists does not show justice was actually served. The final chapter is still being written. Stay tuned.

Why wasn’t his defense able to persuade the 12 jurors? You are leaving half the story out.

Postvieww · 2025-12-18T08:06:38-0600

comana said:
Why wasn’t his defense able to persuade the 12 jurors? You are leaving half the story out.

Do you forget where this trial was held? It is actually sometimes hard to get and impartial jury. That why venues are sometimes changed. I know it is more advantageous to the liberal narrative to claim all was above board and the Trump conviction was actually blind justice but nothing could be further from the truth. We shall see how all if the appeals come out. This was liberal lawfare plain and simple.

Tim Walz Vows to Bring More Somalis to Minnesota, Despite Growing Fraud Scandal Reaching Into the Billions

Believer

Well-Known Member

Believer

Well-Known Member

Constitutionalist

Constitutionalist

Constitutionalist

Well-Known Member

Stuck on a ship.

Well-Known Member

Stuck on a ship.

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative

Gumby

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative

Gumby

Area Meathead

Believer

Believer

Senior Veteran

Believer

Similar threads