• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Trump Says US Will Permanently Pause Migration From 'Third World Countries'

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,935
22,248
30
Nebraska
✟896,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
What about it? The US has less than 1% inbreeding rate. Compare that to EVERY MUSLIM COUNTRY. Then look at non-muslim countries and see what their Muslim population is. You will quickly discover that the higher the Muslim population, the higher the inbreeding. The higher the inbreeding means a lower average IQ.
Considering the daughter of Muhammad married her close relative, that doesn’t surprise me. I think it’s common among some Hindu Indians as well.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,935
22,248
30
Nebraska
✟896,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I won't bother to bring up the numerous Christian settlements and groups around the US who do this very thing.
It’s rather rare here. Incredibly rare, actually.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,935
22,248
30
Nebraska
✟896,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Show me the science on that.
Without going off topic, first cousin marriage used to be pretty common and the norm up until the civil war in the United States. Queen Victoria was married to her first cousin (the late Queen Elizabeth II and her husband Prince Philip were third cousins and great-great grandchildren of Queen Victoria).

It’s mostly taboo in the West. (Although legal in some states)
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,935
22,248
30
Nebraska
✟896,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
  • Like
Reactions: rambot
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
10,588
5,697
Louisiana
✟316,364.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
10,588
5,697
Louisiana
✟316,364.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Without going off topic, first cousin marriage used to be pretty common and the norm up until the civil war in the United States. Queen Victoria was married to her first cousin (the late Queen Elizabeth II and her husband Prince Philip were third cousins and great-great grandchildren of Queen Victoria).

It’s mostly taboo in the West. (Although legal in some states)
Even where first cousin marriage is legal, it is very rare in Christian societies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
29,547
16,749
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟470,756.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Like Islamic culture groups?
cultural groups within a country. I'm not sure why this is hard to understand...

Are you trying to talk about sects of Islam?
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,935
22,248
30
Nebraska
✟896,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
cultural groups within a country. I'm not sure why this is hard to understand...

Are you trying to talk about sects of Islam?
Amish for example since they don’t marry outside their religion and (generally) don’t accept converts? Or other groups such as old order Mennonites or Hutterites that live the same lifestyle as the Amish and come from the same Anabaptist family?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aryeh Jay
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,935
22,248
30
Nebraska
✟896,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,935
22,248
30
Nebraska
✟896,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican

Here you go.
From a very basic scientific understanding, that doesn’t surprise me, sadly. Genetic diversity is a must when it comes to reproduction- BUT we are starting to get off topic.
 
Upvote 0

seeking.IAM

A View From The Pew
Site Supporter
Feb 29, 2004
5,020
5,811
Indiana
✟1,185,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Here you go.
Thank you for providing the source. The only thing that interested me in my quick read was that the article was published in 2014 and their measure was the WISC which was replaced in 1974 by the WISC-R. I think the results are relative (no pun intended) and would not have been changed by using the current version of the test, but I wonder why they did that. I doubt it is a textual error given the thoroughness of the article.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0