• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Kim Davis ask SCOTUS to overturn her jury verdict and, while they're at it, the Obergefell decision

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
44,071
47,086
Los Angeles Area
✟1,051,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed for six days in 2015 after refusing to issue marriage licenses to a gay couple on religious grounds, is appealing a $100,000 jury verdict for emotional damages plus $260,000 for attorneys fees.

In a petition for writ of certiorari filed last month, Davis argues First Amendment protection for free exercise of religion immunizes her from personal liability for the denial of marriage licenses.

More fundamentally, she claims the high court's decision in Obergefell v Hodges -- extending marriage rights for same-sex couples under the 14th Amendment's due process protections -- was "egregiously wrong."

A federal appeals court panel concluded earlier this year that the former clerk "cannot raise the First Amendment as a defense because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect."
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay

CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN

My dad died 1/12/2023. I'm still devastated.
Jul 1, 2007
18,097
5,624
Native Land
✟402,634.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I wouldn't be surprised if SCOTUS did over turn jury verdict. It seems like the United States is going very backwards.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,140
14,272
Earth
✟257,777.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
What power does she have? None really.
Asking SCOTUS to make her own personal-views the law-of-the-land, is quaint.
Won’t get cert.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,347
22,041
30
Nebraska
✟878,610.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Asking SCOTUS to make her own personal-views the law-of-the-land, is quaint.
Won’t get cert.
She’s irrelevant now. She just needs to move on.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
44,071
47,086
Los Angeles Area
✟1,051,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

Supreme Court rejects long-shot effort to overturn same-sex marriage ruling

The court turned away an appeal filed by Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky who was sued after refusing to issue a marriage license to a gay couple.

Without comment, the justices rejected an appeal brought by Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky who was sued in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses because of her opposition to same-sex marriage based on her religious beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
44,071
47,086
Los Angeles Area
✟1,051,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
On to the next test case.
IANAL, but it was my understanding that Davis, being one of the few people 'harmed' by Obergefell, was probably the conservatives' best bet to overturn it. Just saying "I don't like this." does not get you standing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
5,376
6,420
New Jersey
✟418,304.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
IANAL, but it was my understanding that Davis, being one of the few people 'harmed' by Obergefell, was probably the conservatives' best bet to overturn it. Just saying "I don't like this." does not get you standing.

Ah, I hadn't thought of that aspect of it.

On the religious liberty issue, I can see that there might be a point in Davis' favor, that she should receive some kind of workplace accommodation (similar to Sikhs getting to wear their turban in the workplace, or Jews getting to take Yom Kippur as a day off work). It looks like Kentucky already took care of this, by issuing marriage licenses without the clerk's signature. Good, done.

On Obergefell itself, I'm relieved. I can't imagine what overturning Obergefell would look like. Thousands of marriages suddenly being declared invalid? Marriage on a state-by-state basis, so that your marriage in Vermont isn't recognized if you drive into Kentucky? Yeesh.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
44,071
47,086
Los Angeles Area
✟1,051,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
On Obergefell itself, I'm relieved. I can't imagine what overturning Obergefell would look like. Thousands of marriages suddenly being declared invalid? Marriage on a state-by-state basis, so that your marriage in Vermont isn't recognized if you drive into Kentucky? Yeesh.
It was indeed a mess for many couples in California when Prop 8 halted SSM in California in November of 2008 after the state Supreme Court declared it legal that June. Just filing taxes became a Kafka novel.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: PloverWing
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
22,974
18,881
✟1,497,753.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
On Obergefell itself, I'm relieved. I can't imagine what overturning Obergefell would look like.
Unless it was a Dread Scott level no rights for LGBT at all level ruling that somehow did away with the respect for marriage act as well it would be a non event.
 
Upvote 0

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
5,376
6,420
New Jersey
✟418,304.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Unless it was a Dread Scott level no rights for LGBT at all level ruling that somehow did away with the respect for marriage act as well it would be a non event.

I'm picturing the Loving v Virginia situation, where the Lovings were legally married in DC but not in Virginia. I suppose it doesn't get nightmarish unless they also reverse Lawrence v Texas, but still, married couples aren't supposed to have to worry about which rights they lose when they cross state lines.
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
22,974
18,881
✟1,497,753.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
… married couples aren't supposed to have to worry about which rights they lose when they cross state lines.
And they don’t have to unless the respect for marriage act gets repealed/overturned.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
38,347
22,041
30
Nebraska
✟878,610.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican

Supreme Court rejects long-shot effort to overturn same-sex marriage ruling

The court turned away an appeal filed by Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky who was sued after refusing to issue a marriage license to a gay couple.

Without comment, the justices rejected an appeal brought by Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky who was sued in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses because of her opposition to same-sex marriage based on her religious beliefs.
Not surprising. It’s not like Davis had any power to do anything to begin with. Her 15 minutes of fame are long gone.
 
Upvote 0