- Jan 29, 2010
- 20,810
- 5,101
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
The end of the filibuster would mean that Trump could pass ANY laws that he wants for the next 2+ years.
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The other thing is that the same could apply to the democrats later.The end of the filibuster would mean that Trump could pass ANY laws that he wants for the next 2+ years.
Link - quote - any validation?The end of the filibuster would mean that Trump could pass ANY laws that he wants for the next 2+ years.
to what the claim that Trump wants to do it or the claimed result?Link - quote - any validation?
but I do not think they really want that because they ( both sides) only want it when it is THEIR side that would benefit.Prominent Supporters of Ending the Filibuster
Looks like there should be wide bipartisan support.
- Elizabeth Warren (Senator, MA) A vocal advocate for ending the filibuster to pass progressive legislation like voting rights and climate action.
- Bernie Sanders (Senator, VT) Has repeatedly called for abolishing the filibuster to advance economic and social reforms.
- Cory Booker (Senator, NJ) Supports filibuster reform to ensure passage of civil rights and justice legislation.
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Representative, NY) Criticized the filibuster as a tool of obstruction and has urged Senate Democrats to eliminate it.
- Dick Durbin (Senator, IL) As Senate Majority Whip during Biden’s presidency, Durbin backed filibuster reform to pass voting rights and gun control laws.
- Sheldon Whitehouse (Senator, RI) Advocated for ending the filibuster to address climate change and judicial reform.
- Ed Markey (Senator, MA) Called the filibuster a relic of Jim Crow and pushed for its removal to pass progressive legislation.
- Tammy Baldwin (Senator, WI) Supported filibuster reform to protect democracy and expand healthcare access.
- Mazie Hirono (Senator, HI) Has consistently supported eliminating the filibuster to advance Democratic priorities.
QFT - it is a power play.but I do not think they really want that because they ( both sides) only want it when it is THEIR side that would benefit.
I wonder if Trump would have the same take if it were the democrats that controlled the senate?Trump pushes 'nuclear option' to end government shutdown
President Donald Trump, in a lengthy social media post on Thursday night, called on Senate Republicans to eliminate the filibuster to pass the Republican funding bill and reopen the government. "It is now time for the Republicans to play their 'TRUMP CARD,' and go for what is called the Nuclear Option -- Get rid of the Filibuster, and get rid of it, NOW!" Trump posted.
He did not when they tried in his first term.I wonder if Trump would have the same take if it were the democrats that controlled the senate?
but I do not think they really want that because they ( both sides) only want it when it is THEIR side that would benefit.
thank you Mike Johnson maybe what they should do is say OK fine but there will be no more filibuster. This way the republicans will know the risk that runs up front.
- The government shutdown that began on October 1, 2025, has dragged on for over a month, with 13 failed Senate votes to pass temporary funding.
- President Donald Trump has urged Senate Republicans to invoke the nuclear option to push through a funding bill without needing Democratic support.
- Trump argued that Democrats would do the same if they had the majority, and that Republicans should “play their TRUMP CARD” to reopen the government.
- Supporters say it’s necessary to end gridlock and restore government services, especially with SNAP benefits for 40 million Americans at risk.
- Opponents, including some Republican senators, warn it would undermine Senate norms and make future bipartisan cooperation harder.
- House Speaker Mike Johnson emphasized that the filibuster is a “very important safeguard” and that changing it could backfire if power shifts.
so then it sounds like Trump only does not want the filbiuster when HIS side is control. I am a republican, but you need to be careful what you wish for. Maybe since mid-terms have not happened yet ( which means that Trump COULD be facing the democrats getting the majority while he is still in office maybe they should agree to it, but ONLY IF Trump is willing to assume the risk of fair play the second half of his term.He did not when they tried in his first term.
yup it is not like they need 80% or anything if they have 60 they can push it through. I am sure there have been at least 2 years in this country's 200+ year history where one party has had 60 people in the senate.I don't think anything should change - the filibuster is there for a reason.
If htis is just an AI post, pleast indicate
- The government shutdown that began on October 1, 2025, has dragged on for over a month, with 13 failed Senate votes to pass temporary funding.
- President Donald Trump has urged Senate Republicans to invoke the nuclear option to push through a funding bill without needing Democratic support.
- Trump argued that Democrats would do the same if they had the majority, and that Republicans should “play their TRUMP CARD” to reopen the government.
- Supporters say it’s necessary to end gridlock and restore government services, especially with SNAP benefits for 40 million Americans at risk.
- Opponents, including some Republican senators, warn it would undermine Senate norms and make future bipartisan cooperation harder.
- House Speaker Mike Johnson emphasized that the filibuster is a “very important safeguard” and that changing it could backfire if power shifts.
except that it is not even mid-terms yet so he may not be gone when the other party takes control.I don't know why anyone thinks that Trump is concerned about how the legislature will act after he is gone.
One year from now the GOP will lose at least one chamber of Congress.The end of the filibuster would mean that Trump could pass ANY laws that he wants for the next 2+ years.